RAF Rivet Joint
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
From: UK East Anglia
FZ, The sign was last seen in C Flt Crew room at Wyton. As I understand things it is no longer relevant as the average age of the formation eating team is significantly lower these days.
When's the party? Lots of folks getting their Zimmer frames polished up ready.
When's the party? Lots of folks getting their Zimmer frames polished up ready.
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Croydon
I've just come across a detailed account of the Offurt fire: USAF RC-135V Rivet Joint Oxygen Fire

Do the RAF use L3 for maintenance?
A US Air Force (USAF) accident investigation has paradoxically determined that a fire that caused of damage in April 2015 was due to a maintenance error but that no human factors were involved.

During investigation it was found that some B-nuts in the oxygen system were finger tight. The USAF report states:
The board president found by preponderance of the evidence that the cause of the mishap was a leak in the high-pressure oxygen system due to poor assembly of the system tubing at depot maintenance. Failure by L3 Communications depot maintenance personnel to tighten a retaining nut connecting a metal oxygen tube to a junction fitting above the galley properly caused an oxygen leak. This leak created a highly flammable oxygen-rich environment that ignited. The resulting fire melted the retaining nut causing the tubing to become detached from the junction fitting, feeding more oxygen to the fire, increasing its size, and causing severe damage to the airframe, galley, and mission equipment onboard the aircraft.
However, very oddly the report also says:AFI 91-204, Safety Investigations and Reports, 24 September 2008, Attachment 5, contains the Department of Defense Human Factors Analysis and Classification System [HFACS], which lists potential human factors that can play a role in any mishap. Human factors consider how people’s tools, tasks and working environment systematically influence human performance. There is no evidence that human factors contributed to this mishap. [Emphasis Added]

Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 361
Likes: 8
From: Canada
Now here is me thinking that oxygen is not flammable, it just supports whatever is burning and makes things burn hotter and faster when there is lots of it. So if I am correct, there must have been an ignition source (root cause) and/or a fire, which rapidly accelerated in the oxygen rich environment. Wonder what that was? I think therefore the oxygen leak was not the cause of the fire but was the accelerant.
Standing by to be corrected.
Standing by to be corrected.

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,109
Likes: 290
From: Nevada, USA
Squib66,
All Rivet Joint airframe and mission systems modifications are overseen by L-3 Communications (previously Raytheon) under the oversight of USAF Materiel Command.
Conversion of the former KC-135Rs to RC-135W standard for the RAF was of course done there.
RC-135V/W Rivet Joint > U.S. Air Force > Fact Sheet Display
http://www.raf.mod.uk/equipment/rc135wrivetjoint.cfm
All Rivet Joint airframe and mission systems modifications are overseen by L-3 Communications (previously Raytheon) under the oversight of USAF Materiel Command.
Conversion of the former KC-135Rs to RC-135W standard for the RAF was of course done there.
RC-135V/W Rivet Joint > U.S. Air Force > Fact Sheet Display
http://www.raf.mod.uk/equipment/rc135wrivetjoint.cfm
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Croydon
RAFEngO74to09
At least the USAF think L3 are maintenance error proof!
USAF RC-135V Rivet Joint Oxygen Fire
Avtur
I think you are right. Perhaps the fire was so devastating where ever the short came from was probably burnt beyond recognition.
At least the USAF think L3 are maintenance error proof!
USAF RC-135V Rivet Joint Oxygen Fire
Avtur
I think you are right. Perhaps the fire was so devastating where ever the short came from was probably burnt beyond recognition.

Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,092
Likes: 47
Third RJ arrival in UK
I see the third RAF Rivet Joint has arrived in the UK on time -
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/uk-t...5-rivet-joint/
IIRC this was the one that was involved in unspecified testing in the US.
Presumably the second ship has by now returned from it's unspecified repairs in the US.
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/uk-t...5-rivet-joint/
IIRC this was the one that was involved in unspecified testing in the US.
Presumably the second ship has by now returned from it's unspecified repairs in the US.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Deepest darkest London
All three were present after 666 landed.
As for the picture on that article, the second a/c was delivered in 2015 direct to Mildenhall. So can't be the one in that pic, (i'm guessing its 664 at the last Waddo airshow) as Waddington runway certainly wasn't in anything like one piece then. Not that the report is much good having relied on an irritating twitterfeeder
I noticed they removed the old V-bomber dispersals from the end of the runway.
V1
As for the picture on that article, the second a/c was delivered in 2015 direct to Mildenhall. So can't be the one in that pic, (i'm guessing its 664 at the last Waddo airshow) as Waddington runway certainly wasn't in anything like one piece then. Not that the report is much good having relied on an irritating twitterfeeder
I noticed they removed the old V-bomber dispersals from the end of the runway.
V1
Thread Starter
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...

Joined: Jul 2000
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 24,645
Likes: 7,343
From: Peripatetic






