Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Morale

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Aug 2012, 10:06
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
When somone mentioned to a 2* the other day that fulfilling his requests might take a little time due to lack of people and too short a deadline, he apparently pointed out that there were "24 hours in a day" and people should "dry their eyes."
Your 2* sounds like a complete cock! At least at my place the 2 and 1*s will turn off taskings and then go in to bat on our behalf. As any good leader and manager should. Unless of course, they are more interested in promotions and knighthoods than unit effectiveness. Doesn't change the fact that morale at our unit is, overall, pretty low and the MO we have on Staff said of the results of a staff survey that if the unit was his patient he would be considering prescribing anti-depressants all round.

Edited to add that despite having grown up leadership in place, it's still all pretty ropey.

Last edited by Melchett01; 19th Aug 2012 at 17:01.
Melchett01 is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2012, 15:21
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Scotland
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Morale on my Sqn is non-existant. I loved my job and the service but i had no alternative but to send off that letter in January - ( 8 months out of 15 OOA and a lucrative alternative job in civvy st forced my hand. I was successful. I now only have four nightshifts left in the RAF. To those who remain, Per Ardua.
enginesuck is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2012, 20:40
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,792
Received 78 Likes on 35 Posts
Re the "24 hours in a day" comment - it's a reflection on the terrible working practices of 2* / 3* officers. How do they think they are in a fit state to make important decisions at 8pm having been at work since 6:30am?

Anyone who thinks they are important enough that they need to be in the office for 14 hours a day, plus a solo Sunday afternoon email session, either has too big an area of responsibility or is appalling at delegation.

Edited to add: Or they are afraid of making big decisions, so they spend far too long looking at trivia.

Last edited by Easy Street; 18th Aug 2012 at 21:59.
Easy Street is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2012, 21:10
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hotel Gypsy
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I chose to jump ship a few years back not long after a particular Stn Cdrs conference at Coningsby. The massed crowds were discussing a variety of issues when OC Cottesmore commented that there was no 'fun' anymore. At that, AOC 1Gp, brown nosing to CinC STC, responded by asking said stn cdr whether he had ordered him not to have fun. Knob.

I understand the chap is now a faceless 3-star in Europe somewhere. Probably still a knob.

Last edited by Cows getting bigger; 18th Aug 2012 at 21:10.
Cows getting bigger is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2012, 06:48
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In the Ether
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
When somone mentioned to a 2* the other day that fulfilling his requests might take a little time due to lack of people and too short a deadline, he apparently pointed out that there were "24 hours in a day"....
...and perhaps the response should have been "yes, Sir, but if there are 24 hours in this day, then there are no more than 8 hrs tomorrow..."

Seniority's short term mindset in a nutshell.
Uncle Ginsters is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2012, 14:32
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its probably appropriate to point out the MOD/Senior Officers/Civil Servants legislative policy statement at the moment. "We have never forgotten that you have no choice". And before some wag says yes you have, you can leave I would like to point out that at times I have enjoyed keeping my pile of piece in one ****. where's Bob Crow when you need him.
Scotch Bonnet is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2012, 20:43
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,452
Received 72 Likes on 33 Posts
Nice to see in this day and age of "health and safety", "human factors", "quality improvement", and supposedly more enlightened times that a 2*'s approach is that of a Victorian mill owner who simply works his employees to death..... (see post 20)



Hopefully he'll be one of the 25% to be cut!!

http://www.pprune.org/military-aircr...-posts-go.html

Last edited by Biggus; 19th Aug 2012 at 20:46.
Biggus is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2012, 21:10
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,452
Received 72 Likes on 33 Posts
"Who did it?"



Deny everything Baldrick!!
Biggus is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2012, 21:53
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Biggus. You forgot:


Last edited by GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU; 19th Aug 2012 at 21:54.
GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2012, 01:48
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,452
Received 72 Likes on 33 Posts
GBZ,

I didn't, we don't do IIP any more.....
Biggus is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2012, 05:58
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,225
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
But in the case of the Gov't, I know that Labour, and Gordon 'the traitor' Brown (who should be hanged as the traitorous scumbag he is) are DIRECTLY responsible and culpable for the mess the whole country is in. But, I want to know which of the UK's Air Officers has allowed the RAF to fall into the desperate straits in which it now find itself. They should be sacked at best, prosecuted most likely. Why should they be allowed to escape their incompetence?
While I agree with the sentiments expressed, it is a simple fact that Labour were not in power when the policy was formulated (June 1987) and issued (Jan 1988) by AMSO to knowingly waste money on a scale that would make your eyes water. This deliberate waste was formally reported to PUS (Chief Accounting Officer) in Jan 1988 and June 1996 by MoD's own auditors.

Successive regimes, including Labour, have supported both the policy and those who actively and enthusiastically implemented it. The last five Ministers for the Armed Forces (Labour and Coalition) have been happy to condone these actions, in writing.

As for Gordon Brown, for all his faults he is the one senior politician to have condemned MoD, calling it a "citadel of waste". What puzzled me was his apparent refusal to do anything about it when he had the opportunity.

The Public Accounts Committee, by convention, is chaired by an Opposition MP; currently Margaret Hodge. (Which is why there is always shared blame in such matters, but it is also a self-healing arrangement). Again, successive versions have been vocal about waste, but as soon as the underlying cause and culprits are revealed to them, they mysteriously back off. This has happened again very recently. Why? It can only be to protect the guilty who, as you say, should be rotting in gaol.

Why gaol? Because by perpetrating this waste they MUST have breached the legal obligations they were under and made false written declarations - which is fraud.

But the same successive regimes have ruled that committing this fraud is NOT an offence in MoD. The facts are not denied by MoD. I have the letters with the signatures of all these decision makers, so the answer to "Who did it" (as well as "Who encouraged and protected them?") is well known.

Last edited by tucumseh; 20th Aug 2012 at 06:01.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2012, 07:30
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: preston
Age: 76
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New regulations (according to the Telegraph), mean all Military Personnel now have to travel Economy Class (Most Circumstances) . Have similar changes been made for the Civil Service? A friend of mine, who ranks lowest of the low (in Civil Service terms), always goes First Class by rail because her Boss (a Sqn Ldr equivalent), travels with her.
dalek is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2012, 07:43
  #33 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
dalek, yes, they travel 2nd class too.

We stopped IiP because we couldn't afford it. I know one money waster was Brian Burridge's dirctive for everyone to get the ECDL. Complete waste of time and money. Instead of teaching people how to write it would have been better teaching those that wanted to how to type.

Interesting to comparecivil service courses and military ones. CS ones generally last a day, employ a couple of facilitators who have probably never met before and are usually a waste of money.

RAF ones generally lsast one week or two, start on a Monday thus requiring travel on Saturday or Sundayand you usually learn something.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2012, 07:47
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Scopwick
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Strange that; my fiancee is 'Wing Commander equivalent' in the Civil Service and she went standard class to 'shabby wood' the other week.
Prop Fwd is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2012, 12:03
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,225
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
travels with her
The cost of attending meetings double handed far exceeds the difference between 1st and 2nd class travel! A technical Project Manager in what was MoD(PE) was required to be able to carry out every job in the team, so there was seldom justification for anyone else to travel, the exception being if he had a trainee with him.

When IPTs were formed (2nd time round, not the late 80s model) IPTLs were given the authority to drive a bus through the regulations. It was "their" budget and they could spend it as they liked. So you'd get the indirect labour (invariably the senior grades/ranks with no responsibility or accountability) swanning off on 1st class jollies and drinking the hotel bar dry on the IPT account (literally, on one notorious occasion) and direct labour (usually the lower ranks, but those with the signature) refused permission to attend the likes of design and safety meetings they were meant to be chairing. That would explain the situation Dalek describes.

This also serves to highlight the basic problem I've come across in many IPTs . The "pyramid" is inverted, with the most senior staffs surplus to requirements as they contribute little. And yes, before you ask, I've been an IPTL, but 23 years ago when IPTs were not bloated with untrained staffs each doing a fraction of a job!

Last edited by tucumseh; 20th Aug 2012 at 12:04.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2012, 12:44
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The MOD is not the military, the military is in places like Afghanistan suffering from the incompetence and self serving policies of the MOD. There may be members of the military in the MOD, some of whom have been promoted to the level of their own incompetence, some of whom additionally may be following their own self serving policies. That does not mean that the MOD is the military. It is not.
Well said Chuggley.
Al R is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2012, 13:01
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Sussex
Age: 82
Posts: 4,764
Received 228 Likes on 71 Posts
tuc:
While I agree with the sentiments expressed, it is a simple fact that Labour were not in power when the policy was formulated (June 1987) and issued (Jan 1988) by AMSO to knowingly waste money on a scale that would make your eyes water.
So the rot set in under PM Margaret Thatcher and her SOS for Defence, Michael Heseltine. Organised and deliberate gross waste that was recouped (or at least that was the plan) by a direct attack within the MOD upon Air Safety, and in particular the budget for the provision of UK Military Airworthiness. Those responsible are known and evidence has been submitted to two judicial reviews, the civil police and the RAF Provost Marshal. Nothing has been done, not even an interview, as they are evidently "honourable men". Evil happens when good men do nothing!
There have been 62 deaths alone in Airworthiness related military air accidents reviewed in this forum, broken careers, and most devastating of all, a system that remains broken and will continue to be so until the MAAIB and the MAA are made independent of the MOD and of each other.
Chugalug2 is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2012, 15:02
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Morale

Sad that 2* in post 20 believes his own spin. My experience at HQ Castle Grey Skulls is of very supportive grown ups and we do say no - especially to Centre. Moreover, my team are encouraged to question where value is dubious and to seek explanations of new words/jargon. Not surprisingly, less bull, higher productivity and more time for meaningful tasks.
4fitter is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2012, 17:26
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,047
Received 2,920 Likes on 1,249 Posts
I always thought the simple cure for low Morale was in the word itself..

Mor Ale






.

Last edited by NutLoose; 20th Aug 2012 at 21:15.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2012, 20:21
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: norfolk, uk
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 3 Posts
Whaddawewant?

On a miserable day on 85 Squadron at West Raynham in the early 1970s we used to shout "More beer, longer runways, bigger women". That seemed to cheer people up, albeit briefly.
mike rondot is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.