Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Morale

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Aug 2012, 19:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Secret airbase in Cranwell
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Morale

According to the MoD the fact that forces morale is at its lowest ebb is ok because at least the books now balance!! So no additional cuts for ABC13 and a pay rise next year then.


Armed Forces morale at its lowest ebb since 2008, Mirror study reveals - Mirror Online
Startrek3 is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2012, 20:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by The Mirror
An MOD spokesman said: “We have made tough decisions to get the defence budget back into balance.”
Aah. Poor them having to make the tough decisions. But it was the serving personnel that had to live with your tough decision.

[CYNIC]

In my opinion, those attitude serveys always, somehow, managed to paint a much rosier picture of the way people felt than was evident at the front line. Always looked bit like the outcome of a BoI; "Don't bore me with the facts and evidence gathered by the Board, I've decided to reach my own conclusions that suit my own adgenda."

[/CYNIC]

Last edited by Courtney Mil; 16th Aug 2012 at 20:31.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2012, 00:07
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,225
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
The "tough" decision would be to name and shame those who wasted the money in the first place.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2012, 08:14
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: London
Age: 44
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
"Aah. Poor them having to make the tough decisions. But it was the serving personnel that had to live with your tough decision."

Another classic example of the military mindset that somehow boxes up 'the MOD' and decides that it is a separate organisation to the armed forces and therefore can be blamed ad naueseum.

In reality those decision were taken by serving personnel, who will be living with them. The MOD is the military - whether the military like it or not!
Jimlad1 is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2012, 08:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
I anticipated that response.

I was going to explain about ivory towers, ministerial decisions, top brass, etc, but it's all too difficult.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2012, 09:42
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: God's Country
Posts: 139
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sadly after 32 years I am seeing the Service that I joined as a personal commitment change to something I am not familiar. I, as a young recruit, was told that integrity, moral courage and selfless Service was paramount. Being responsible for my decisions would decide my own future. It seems that the RAF is now a ‘job’ and is treated as such. This has turned some elements into a social experiment. I was under the impression that you joined up knowing that you would abide by laws and regulations. Not enlist then want to change them to suit your own personal circumstances.
It would be unfair to blame the RAF alone. Our own politicians don’t seem to be responsible for the decisions they make. It seems personal gain is more important than ‘Serving your country’.
Are things worse? No, just different for a different generation.
The Nip is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2012, 09:55
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,225
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
In reality those decision were taken by serving personnel,

What decisions?

To cut personnel/equipment programmes to compensate for wasted money?

Or to waste the money in the first place?


If you don't or can't think beyond the first, then you're part of the problem.

If you can't name those responsible for the second, you haven't been paying attention.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2012, 10:37
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
It seems that the RAF is now a ‘job’

I think every profession or Service is now a 'job'. Teaching has gone this way too. I treat colleagues with the same qualities of tolerance, loyalty etc that I always did in the RAF, but HR and senior management I treat with the contempt they deserve. They started it, and I believe the only route to change is to hit them where it hurts - in the pocket and hassle-factor.

Question: Who would now recommend to teenagers a career in the Services?

(Job, maybe, for what you can get out of it, but not a career)
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2012, 10:52
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South of Old Warden
Age: 87
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Shurely, if morale is low, then beatings should continue until it bluddy well improves!
goudie is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2012, 11:23
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,340
Received 62 Likes on 45 Posts
Foxy, I have to challenge you on the teaching bit- something we both clearly have strong views about. In my school, the staff really walk in ignorance of the Teachers' Pay and Conditions 'blue book'. Why, because I ensure they get their due and more. They in turn, don't play the 'not my job' card, and go the extra mile. Eg, funerals of non close family (not entitled to go)- I never refuse because it's important to them. Dentals and doctors the same. In return, I expect deadlines to be met, planning to be done and all the rest. Within my oft stated assertion that, "This is not a democracy", morale is high, as are standards.

Regards

CG

Sorry for drift, everyone.

Last edited by charliegolf; 17th Aug 2012 at 11:24.
charliegolf is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2012, 12:22
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: UK
Age: 24
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CG, My wife and many of our friends are teachers. Anecdotal evidence is that you are defiantly in the minority, and if there is ignorance of pay and conditions it is out of loyalty and obligation to the children, not to the management or local government.

Back on thread, I will only support (not encourage) my kids to join up if they do so with a short term aim to gain experience and training, not as a career. Since leaving I've discovered there are many opportunities that reward your effort and endeavours, not rely on them to keep a broken system working for the benefit of others.

Last edited by Mike Rosewhich; 17th Aug 2012 at 12:24.
Mike Rosewhich is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2012, 16:28
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Shurely, if morale is low, then beatings should continue until it bluddy well improves!"

Not quite the Imperial Japaneses Submarine Service yet...............
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2012, 17:15
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Sussex
Age: 82
Posts: 4,764
Received 228 Likes on 71 Posts
Jimlad1:
The MOD is the military - whether the military like it or not!
The MOD is not the military, the military is in places like Afghanistan suffering from the incompetence and self serving policies of the MOD. There may be members of the military in the MOD, some of whom have been promoted to the level of their own incompetence, some of whom additionally may be following their own self serving policies. That does not mean that the MOD is the military. It is not. On the contrary the MOD as a whole constitutes are far more deadly adversary than the military is ever likely to be called upon to confront in the field. Another of Mountbatten's "good ideas" that has cost far too much life and treasure.

Last edited by Chugalug2; 17th Aug 2012 at 17:17.
Chugalug2 is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2012, 17:51
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Can't argue with that.

Last edited by Courtney Mil; 17th Aug 2012 at 20:07.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2012, 17:56
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Horsham, England, UK. ---o--O--o---
Posts: 1,185
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Hopefully the MOD have the same low morale; to match their low performance!

They and the Government should be hanging their heads in shame.

Last edited by Out Of Trim; 17th Aug 2012 at 17:57.
Out Of Trim is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2012, 17:57
  #16 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
A few years ago, at a PR/media seminar, the point was made from the top that MOD = Bad, RAF = Good. Now would I be a cynic to suspect that there is actually a plan for the bad news to remain at the centre and the good news to go to the Service?
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 17th Aug 2012, 17:58
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Up North (for now)
Age: 62
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some definite Nail and Head action there Chug.

Military types that work in MOD soon realise they have to become 'Political Animals' to survive and potentially get anything achieved.

The trouble is, the moment they turn into said Political Animals they are then totally unable to properly look out for the interests of the Military.
zedder is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2012, 05:03
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 270
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From the Mirror article...
Morale among our Armed Forces heroes has slumped under the Coalition.


Job cuts, botched defence reviews and pay caps last year put the military at its lowest ebb since 2008.
So, in other words if it is at its lowest SINCE 2008 surely in 2008, under the previous New Liarbour Government, morale must have been lower than it is now? Therefore morale must have picked up (not sure I remember when that was!) before falling again, but is still not as low as it was under the previous bunch of political idiots
MFC_Fly is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2012, 07:53
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I reckon if the survey was done now, morale would be even lower. The Olympics security debacle has driven most people to the depths of despair.

My unit is broken. 20% downgraded or sick, largely due to the 3 times a week beastings from the PTIs, and of the rest, 15% are OOA, 15% are on reserve for OOA, 30% are on Olympic Duties. It leaves 20% remaining, many of whom are either posted shortly with no replacement, discharged with no replacement, on guard (still have to do that!), or untrained and therefore not able to be utilised.

My management have tried to refuse taskings that come in, but the upper echalons only hear white noise. The end result being that people cannot get their OOA prep done because they are constantly doing another task, meaning those OOA are having to stag on for longer.....

Morale is rock bottom at my place.
muttywhitedog is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2012, 09:23
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: wherever will have me
Posts: 748
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When somone mentioned to a 2* the other day that fulfilling his requests might take a little time due to lack of people and too short a deadline, he apparently pointed out that there were "24 hours in a day" and people should "dry their eyes." Well done Sir, inspiring!
whowhenwhy is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.