Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Was it really fright(e)ning?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Was it really fright(e)ning?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Aug 2012, 19:42
  #141 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: earth
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightning mate mentions ramming - that was prescribed when I did the OCU in 1964. The OC Ops welcomed us to Royal Air Force Fighter Command (a bit rich since most of us had arrived from Chivenor) and told us that with our Lightning we would be able to despatch 4 enemy aircraft - one with each of the two missiles, one with the guns and the fourth one we would ram. I tittered 'cause I thought he had made a funny - first of many career-limiting incidents.

'If you came here to laugh young man, you can leave now' said OC Ops. No sense of humour I decided and was proved right several times through the course.
soddim is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2012, 19:56
  #142 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wilts
Age: 78
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Chiglet
Maybe the thing I saw was for an exercise? (possible)
Or perhaps it's a figment of my rapidly failing memory (more likely)
EngAl is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2012, 20:32
  #143 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 571
Received 15 Likes on 7 Posts
What was also frightening sadly was the rate of Lightning losses. For the three years 1970 to 1971 there were 23 lost - 11 attributed to fires.

This compares with 12 Harrier losses, and 11 each for the Buccaneer, Hunter and Jet Provost during the same period.
Brewster Buffalo is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2012, 20:52
  #144 (permalink)  

Dog Tired
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
For the three years 1970 to 1971 there were 23 lost - 11 attributed to fires.
It was about '70 my bro-in-law, Stu Tulloch left this one on fire.


Last edited by fantom; 1st Aug 2012 at 21:16.
fantom is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2012, 22:46
  #145 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 473
Received 143 Likes on 63 Posts
What was also frightening sadly was the rate of Lightning losses. For the three years 1970 to 1971 there were 23 lost - 11 attributed to fires.

This compares with 12 Harrier losses, and 11 each for the Buccaneer, Hunter and Jet Provost during the same period.
Unless my maths are letting me down that's 68 airframes lost in 3 years. Almost 2 per month, that's frightening beyond belief.....

Last edited by Avionker; 1st Aug 2012 at 22:47.
Avionker is online now  
Old 1st Aug 2012, 22:48
  #146 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: The Sunny Side
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm worried about my math's too. How does 3 years fit into 1970 to 1971?
For the three years 1970 to 1971
S-D
salad-dodger is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2012, 01:12
  #147 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 473
Received 143 Likes on 63 Posts
Doohhh!!!!! Who feels silly now?

Last edited by Avionker; 2nd Aug 2012 at 01:12.
Avionker is online now  
Old 2nd Aug 2012, 11:37
  #148 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Missile Cooling...

IIRC part of the issue in putting anything other than Firestreak/Redtop on the beast was the missile cooling (ammonia?).
The Firestreak used ammonia for cooling, the Redtop used 12,000 psi pure air. Cooling was only for the IR seeker heads, the electronics used (IIRC) Arklone or Trike. The reason for all those 40-gallon drums of water on the flight line was in case a liney copped for a face-full of liquid ammonia - your mates were supposed to dump you head first into a water barrel. Obviously, in some cases all you had to do was give a liney a funny look and you'd end up in a barrel...

I can't think of a reason why Sidewinders couldn't have been fitted - all that gubbins in the missile pack could have been replaced with ballast, the Sidewinder doesn't need much support from the airframe, unlike Firestreak/Redtop. Given the respective weights of Redtop vs Sidewinder you could have got 2 Sidewinder on each pylon. I was on 5 Sqn at the time of the Falklands war and there was talk of underwing hardpoints for Sidewinder carriage, though nothing came of that. Might have got away with overwing Sidewinders a la Jaguar, though.

Liquid ammonia, liquid oxygen, AVPIN, intake checks, it's a wonder any of us groundcrew survived!
endevol is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2012, 11:48
  #149 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,807
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Obviously, in some cases all you had to do was give a liney a funny look and you'd end up in a barrel...
From what one hears, doesn't something similar often happen in the navy....
BEagle is online now  
Old 2nd Aug 2012, 14:05
  #150 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Luberon
Age: 72
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by soddim
told us that with our Lightning we would be able to despatch 4 enemy aircraft - one with each of the two missiles, one with the guns and the fourth one we would ram.
Makes a fatalistic sort of sense.........would there have been any intact bases to return to and do a turn-around?
sitigeltfel is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2012, 15:13
  #151 (permalink)  

Dog Tired
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,688
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
...would there have been any intact bases to return to and do a turn-around?
I wondered that same thing doing the ex-launch nuke-cleaning drills at Bruggen. Waste of time.
fantom is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2012, 17:16
  #152 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,921
Received 2,841 Likes on 1,213 Posts
Quote:
...would there have been any intact bases to return to and do a turn-around?
I wondered that same thing doing the ex-launch nuke-cleaning drills at Bruggen. Waste of time.

Ahh dressed in a see through plastic suit over the top of a NBC suit in summer sweating your nuts off trying to wash a Jag down with a bucket of soapy water and a brush... Thinking if it ever comes to this we are f**ked.
That and the Blue Peter designed decontam centre as you entered the site Hards, built from black plastic sheeting, bodge tape, broom handles and some surreal faith that it would be alright on the night..

Did you ever see the film of the trials of the first HAS's where they stuck some old aircraft and some sheep inside, nailed the door shut and detonated a simulated near miss from I think a 1000 pounder, opening the doors the narrator was wittering on about how the aircraft was damaged it could be brought back into service in days........ We were looking at all the dead sheep, as we would be living in the said HAS's.... Often wondered what pillock thought that would boost our confidence in the concrete coffins.

.

Last edited by NutLoose; 2nd Aug 2012 at 17:22.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2012, 17:21
  #153 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
In '67 or '68, on the Malta Adex the Lightnings demonstrated the QTR is less than 10 minutes including a missile pack drop. On one sortie a colonial was spoofed by the inbound bomber and sent to Recovery. Recovery didn't realise he had been spoofed on to the freq so vectored him back to Luqa. He did a supersonic RTB, QTR, scramble, and engaged the same bomber pre-bomb release.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2012, 18:22
  #154 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,807
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Nope, I've read it several times and still don't understand WTF you're on about, PN......
BEagle is online now  
Old 2nd Aug 2012, 19:18
  #155 (permalink)  
Bro
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A frightening aircraft, no; exhilarating and exciting, definitely.

I think it helped that we had mostly trained on that great Lightning trainer the Gnat, although one chap on my OCU course was heard to complain that the only previous swept-wing aircraft he had flown was the Tiger Moth. First problem was trying to get your wheels up after take-off without exceeding the limiting speed of 250kt, the acceleration was amazing. I never thought that it had any bad flying habits; it normally gave plenty of warning of a spin for example, and would recover, eventually. Incidentally, years after my only Lightning tour I was converting to the Tornado. The 67° swept wing approach was considered to be quite a handful; I thought it was just like a Lightning approach.
Bro is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2012, 20:07
  #156 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NutLoose,

I was glad I was well out of the way at the bottom of a ruddy deep trench and under 3 or 4 feet of well thumped down overhead protection. Al R at front, after the fleet at Wildenrath had called it a day (1985?).


Last edited by Al R; 2nd Aug 2012 at 20:08. Reason: added year
Al R is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2012, 21:09
  #157 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Near Stalyvegas
Age: 78
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On a lighter note......
At a "Summer Camp" at Binbrook, I was chatting to a Chiefy. He said that "If you take the wing top fairimgs off, and bolt on a coupje of rails, then using the Nav Light circutry, you cold pop on a couple of Sidewinders"
As a member of IPMS, at that years Nationals, I exhibited a Lightning Mk6B, Two RedTops and Two Sidewinders in Dark Gre[a]y Camo. It was only when the Aviation "Experts" were told about the 'Winders, they sussed it. They ALL thought it was the colour scheme....
chiglet is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2012, 21:23
  #158 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Nearly...
Got a trip in a T-bird on a UAS attachment one week after soloing the Bulldog. Allowed to fly most of the sortie - different planet! I want one!!
Even took the radar books home to memorise.

Some years later, top the TWU course and... bastards cancelled the last LTF course.

Bloody holds in flying training

Got the shiny new AD jet, but wanted the old one.

I doubt I was alone....most fun I've had clothes on or off


..

Last edited by Fox3WheresMyBanana; 2nd Aug 2012 at 21:29.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2012, 21:23
  #159 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nope, I've read it several times and still don't understand WTF you're on about, PN.....
- a real Lightning pilot does
BOAC is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2012, 22:23
  #160 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Surrey
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And so will the QTR crews, for whom every cough 35 years later has strange AVPIN overtones...
D120A is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.