Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

best machine the RAF never had

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

best machine the RAF never had

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Feb 2020, 12:11
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 494
Received 37 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Bagheera S
Concorde - It was briefly offered as a strategy reconnaissance platform. A squadron would have doubled the production run.


Blue Steel anyone?
WB627 is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2020, 18:09
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
A million years ago in a galaxy far, far away, when Phoon was still "Eurofighter 2000" and in trouble at many levels, there was a plot to gap-fill A2A with recently modded and lightly used F-16A ADFs - to be followed by co-development of the delta-wing F-16 variant with the diverterless inlet and LO nozzle. It had gas for days and carried all weapons conformally or semi-conformally. BAE Systems were not happy bunnies, the USAF wanted to be all-stealth (how''s that working out for ya?), and the upper Pentagon levels saw it as a threat to the nascent JAST, later JSF. The avionics ended up in the Block 60.


LowObservable is offline  
Old 1st Mar 2020, 21:24
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Most of military aviation history would have been rewritten if the Avro Arrow had continued. Its potential was greater than Lightning, better than the Phantom, and a competitor for TSR2.

Given the basic aircraft, its developments and offshoots could easily have been 'the' aircraft which the RAF didn't have, nor many other airforces, but all wished that they did have the Arrow or its descendants.
safetypee is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 00:53
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by safetypee
Most of military aviation history would have been rewritten if the Avro Arrow had continued. Its potential was greater than Lightning, better than the Phantom, and a competitor for TSR2.

Given the basic aircraft, its developments and offshoots could easily have been 'the' aircraft which the RAF didn't have, nor many other airforces, but all wished that they did have the Arrow or its descendants.
While the Arrow had a lot of potential, it really needed a more economical engine, better fire control and better armament to achieve the scope posited.
As developed, afaik it was roughly a MiG-25 equivalent, with a 400nm operating radius.
etudiant is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 08:10
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Rural England, thank God.
Posts: 720
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
Bucc with upgraded avionics, & ergonomic cockpit.
skua is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 10:53
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Just outside Newbury
Age: 55
Posts: 289
Received 29 Likes on 5 Posts
Always with the TSR2...... Am I alone in thinking that the TSR2 looked pretty awful?! Life without the Bucc and the F4 and the Jag and the Fin would have been pretty dull; albeit I'd have opted for F14D over the F3.
Maxibon is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 11:38
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 667
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Maxibon
Always with the TSR2...... Am I alone in thinking that the TSR2 looked pretty awful?! Life without the Bucc and the F4 and the Jag and the Fin would have been pretty dull; albeit I'd have opted for F14D over the F3.
No but i think we are in the minority with the TSR2.
Treble one is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 12:25
  #128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,276
Received 37 Likes on 28 Posts
F-111K....awesome piece of kit
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 13:28
  #129 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,394
Received 1,586 Likes on 723 Posts
TSR2 awful? We just never got to see it warpaint.....



ORAC is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 13:49
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somerset
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have signed copy of that in my den wall

The best ever 'what if'. DM
dangermouse is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 13:54
  #131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Just outside Newbury
Age: 55
Posts: 289
Received 29 Likes on 5 Posts
I standby what I said! It's like a 'nearly-ran' for Gerry and Sylvia Anderson's Thunderbirds contenders. In all fairness, it's a post-modernist-end-of-the-V-Force styled machine that looks unvelievably dated and square (Jag/Fin dynamics accepted).
Maxibon is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 14:06
  #132 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,394
Received 1,586 Likes on 723 Posts
I had a signed copy, it now hangs on my sister’s lounge wall.

She was a teacher and has no interest in aircraft. But my father was an aircraft electrical design engineer and worked on the generator system.

He gave a sigh of relief when it was cancelled. They were pushing the technology of the time to provide enough power fir all the electronics; and very week the avionics engineers were coming back and asking for more...
ORAC is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 15:44
  #133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 240
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by typerated
In a similar vein to : If you could reintroduce into service an upgraded new build of a proven design.

My vote would go for 'best machine the RAF never had' goes to the Viggen.

In the early 70s we could have been buying Viggens in the place of:
Harriers, Jaguars, and perhaps some F4s, while replacing Lightnings.

Looks good in RAF markings I think





Every Jaguar, Lightning and F-4 should've been replaced by F/A-18s more than a generation ago.

Minnie Burner is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 15:51
  #134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Eastern Cape, South Africa
Posts: 138
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
...But a TSR2 Mk2 with next generation avionics could have been something!

a bit like the Jaguar after NAVWASS...
ATSA1 is online now  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 15:53
  #135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Eastern Cape, South Africa
Posts: 138
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
...and yes the JA37 Viggen was gorgeous too!
ATSA1 is online now  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 16:18
  #136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,892
Received 2,832 Likes on 1,210 Posts



Must have had severe trim issues when he launched that..
NutLoose is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 18:11
  #137 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,394
Received 1,586 Likes on 723 Posts
And raise you......

ORAC is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 18:27
  #138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Scotland
Age: 54
Posts: 279
Received 82 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
TSR2 awful? We just never got to see it warpaint.....


As mythical as the other green beast below the water (or the camo B-58)!
Thrust Augmentation is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 18:43
  #139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: England
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oscar EW-58 Phallus, surely....
Capt Pit Bull is offline  
Old 2nd Mar 2020, 20:51
  #140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Stockport MAN/EGCC
Age: 70
Posts: 991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Saunders Roe SR-177
Hawker P-1154
Hawker P-1216
BAC TSR-2
MiL Mi-24 Hind
Tupolev TU-95 Bear ASW & MR
F-14 Tomcat
AVRO 730
AVRO CANADA ARROW
EA-6 Prowler
Though not necessarily in that order, please
David

Last edited by The AvgasDinosaur; 2nd Mar 2020 at 21:29.
The AvgasDinosaur is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.