Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

best machine the RAF never had

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

best machine the RAF never had

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Apr 2012, 12:07
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SU-30MKI

Bear
Big Bear is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2012, 12:41
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: virginia, USA
Age: 56
Posts: 1,062
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
F-117, RAF had several exchange pilots, but never bought them- would have been a good fit in the early 1990's for first days of war operations.
sandiego89 is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2012, 12:51
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F-111K

........
rjtjrt is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2012, 12:58
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If we'd bought the SR A/1 and then continued the technology we wouldn't need the carriers, just a mothership / tanker

Milo Minderbinder is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2012, 13:18
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: England
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old-Duffer:

A couple of years ago, I saw one of a pair of Mi17s which were in this country to train crews for an 'allied air force'. It looked like an overgrown Whirlwind but was said to be reliable, very functional (agricultural was also used to describe it) good to operate, carried shed loads of kit over a good distance and relatively easy to maintain. Perhaps, therefore, Mi17s instead of - dare I say - Wessex?
Flown in as SLF...very agricultural...SHF would be right at home.



Chuffing impressive payload and hot/high performance if I recall...
El_Presidente is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2012, 13:36
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: uk
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
MB5

Martin Baker - Martin-Baker MB5
deltahotel is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2012, 17:34
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Best Machine.....

The PVR Button on JPA
L J R is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2012, 18:12
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: BFG
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FA-18E/F Although it may not be too late.
recce_FAC is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2012, 18:40
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: London UK
Posts: 531
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Can we extend the scope to include aircraft the FAA should have had?
Dr Jekyll is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2012, 19:14
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Northamptonshire
Posts: 1,457
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
Yeh, let's do Fleet Air Arm - I'm always up for a laugh.

It was the RN that turned down the Belvedere because it kept dumping a gallon of AVPIN on the deck when it started up - great bunch of jessicas!!!

O-D
Old-Duffer is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2012, 20:11
  #31 (permalink)  
6f1
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 39
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
6F1

Old-Duffer if you knew anything about carrier aviation you would not be making these inane comments so do us all a favour and go back into your CRAB shell.

Last edited by 6f1; 24th Apr 2012 at 20:33.
6f1 is online now  
Old 24th Apr 2012, 20:23
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: England
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TSR2(no Tornado), F14(even less Tornados), Aurora
tonker is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2012, 20:29
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 45
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FAA, CVA01. Not an aircraft but was defiantly needed.

Hat coat....
dat581 is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2012, 20:31
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm going left field with this...

Mi28N Havoc?

Mi 24 Hind?
Digitised of course and alot cheaper than the Agusta Westland efforts.

However if not,
US Marine 412, IR/EO camera plus crew served or pilot operated door mounted weapons and rocket pods. The COIN dream.

As for those plank wing ladies of leisure...

I second the F15E, multi role capable about 20 yrs ago which I believe the Typhoon still can't do.

But if the Typhoon were ready how about..

Navalised Typhoon for the Fleet Air Arm?
Ricorigs is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2012, 20:35
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry got another 2 left fielders..

A10? Perhaps one of the most perfect role constructed aircraft ever made.

Or ditch the tactical strike fighters and just buy B1 bombers instead.

You can put just about everything on those things. Slap in a radar or just a data link from an awacs and you could do BVR engagement for air to air nonsense.

Alternatively to win the war (assume we are with the Americans everywhere we go) you can pick and mix the bombs you drop.

Plus the pilots would get multi crew, multi engine, jet time on their logbook.

Everyone is happy!
Ricorigs is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2012, 20:53
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
The U-2.

Which we were offered when we first discussed getting rid of the PR9 many years ago, but in our infinite wisdom turned down and then ended up buying a derivative of the cameras anyway
Melchett01 is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2012, 21:59
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about...the Rotodyne...?

would that have been effective in military use?
Milo Minderbinder is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2012, 22:33
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bristol
Age: 56
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A mixed force of Strike Eagles and the latest Hornet.
Surely a lot more flexible an potent than Typhoon and Tornado?

Of course there are possibly more obvious contenders.
The extra C17's needed to have a flexible and maintainable force.
Helicopters (who cares what) that are not falling apart and forty years old (think the replacement for the replacement for the Puma )
MPA aircraft, bearing in mind we are an island nation.
Proper recce aircraft
Brand new aircraft owned by the RAF and used as AT, and not second hand fleets with their own mini fleets.
Spares and engineers so we can use the aircraft we already have....But don't have because they need spares.
Anything sent to Marshalls, that seems to just stay there for ever.
barnstormer1968 is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2012, 06:42
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Taif-Saudi Arabia
Age: 64
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Space Shuttle
AGS Man is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2012, 07:12
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Age: 54
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Rafale, apparently.
Tashengurt is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.