Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Voyager: AT Aircraft Only??

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Voyager: AT Aircraft Only??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Apr 2012, 10:33
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Erehwon
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah, so APART from no wing pods and no centre HDU (or whatever name they're calling it now), it's the RAF's canine's gonads when it comes to Tanking.

Makes you proud doesn't it?

MOD(PE) lives!
Dengue_Dude is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2012, 10:36
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London/Oxford/New York
Posts: 2,924
Received 139 Likes on 64 Posts
Dengue_Dude,


It also has an AT role, arguably more important and relevant at the moment.
pr00ne is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2012, 10:43
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Far far away
Age: 53
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice landing, can't have been Potter then!
D-IFF_ident is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2012, 10:45
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: AKT no more
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your plane?
Pretty plane.
FlapJackMuncher is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2012, 11:16
  #85 (permalink)  

Champagne anyone...?
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: EGDL
Age: 54
Posts: 1,420
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
D-IFF he probably got one of the grown ups to do it for him I imagine
StopStart is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2012, 11:19
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Erehwon
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dengue_Dude,


It also has an AT role, arguably more important and relevant at the moment.
You know, I could have sworn that I'd jump seated on an A330 back from Florida about 10 years ago.

They don't seem to be in a hurry to use it in the AT role thus relieve the pressure on the venerable (now) Trimotor.

I realise that's probably naive, but we are SO good at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.
Dengue_Dude is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2012, 11:31
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Moes Tavern, Springfield
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
quote / she fly's with no wing refueling pods

Airbus A330 MRTT Voyager ZZ330 8th April 2012 - YouTube / unquote



Why would she fly with wing pods if she's not doing an AR mission? pods are taken off / added as per the mission

I understand that the current AT charters (Monarch etc) will need some sort of cancellation period before Voyager can get going with any real AT work... just seen her blast off from Brize heading North, another crew training sortie i'd guess
opsjockey is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2012, 12:21
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Base Crew Training

Shouldnt need much of that to enter service in the Transport role. In the civil world modern Level D simulators allow crews to progress from Sim to Line Training with no Base flying required. (Applies to pilots previously qaulified on jets, as presumably the initial Voyager crews are experienced ex Tri/VC10 etc.)
cessnapete is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2012, 14:53
  #89 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bourton-on-the-Water
Posts: 1,017
Received 16 Likes on 7 Posts
To add to cyrilranch's vid (thanks for that), here's Airbus' official photo



And here's what Airbus says about it
The Airbus Military A330 Multi Role Tanker Transport has made its maiden flight in service with the UK Royal Air Force yesterday April 8th.
Known as the Voyager in RAF service, the aircraft took off from RAF Brize Norton for a training sortie around the United Kingdom to allow the AirTanker crew to familiarise themselves with the aircraft and achieve the first part of the Voyager crew training schedule.
The Voyager aircraft was delivered by Airbus Military to AirTanker, the company formed to operate and support the Voyager for the UK Ministry of Defence under the Future Strategic Transport Aircraft programme, at the end of last year.
The Voyager aircraft represents a new standard in tanker/transport technology and will provide the RAF with the world ́s most advanced air-to-air refueling, passenger transport and aeromedical capability. As a modern and efficient aircraft, the Voyager is quieter and more fuel-efficient than any other aircraft currently based at RAF Brize Norton – the RAF ́s primary transport/tanker base.
Airbus Military has to deliver 14 converted aircraft to AirTanker, of which two have already been converted from the basic A330-200 in Getafe and another two are in conversion at Cobham facilities in the UK. The Voyager has military and civil certification and the service will operate aircraft on both the military and civilian registers.
Antonio Caramazana, Programme Director Airbus Military Derivatives, said: “It is a proud day for everyone involved with the A330 MRTT programme to see the Voyager in service with the RAF. We look forward to many years of successful operation of the aircraft by AirTanker.”
Phil Blundell, Chief Executive of AirTanker said: “The aircraft is a magnificent airframe which combines efficiency, effective tasking capability and reliability. The programme brings together the best of the civilian aviation industry with military operational expertise and will offer an innovative and multi-functional capability to meet the demands of the 21st Century.”

About the A330 MRTT
The Airbus Military A330 MRTT is the only new generation strategic tanker/transport aircraft flying and available today. The large 111 tonnes/ 245,000 lb basic fuel capacity of the successful A330- 200 airliner, from which it is derived, enables the A330 MRTT to excel in Air-to-Air Refuelling missions without the need for any additional fuel tank. The A330 MRTT is offered with a choice of proven air-to-air refuelling systems including an advanced Airbus Military Aerial Refuelling Boom System, and/or a pair of under-wing hose and drogue pods, and/or a Fuselage Refuelling Unit.
Thanks to its true wide-body fuselage, the A330 MRTT can also be used as a pure transport aircraft able to carry 300 troops, or a payload of up to 45 tonnes/99,000 lb. It can also easily be converted to accommodate up to 130 stretchers for Medical Evacuation (MEDEVAC). To-date, a total of 28 A330 MRTTs have been ordered by four customers (Australia, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom), with one (Saudi Arabia) having already placed a repeat order.
Offered without comment.
airsound
airsound is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2012, 15:04
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
I noticed that it was using its G-reg callsign.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2012, 16:31
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: at the end of the bar
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Am I a cynic for thinking that this first flight in service takes place after the start of the financial year?
XV277 is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2012, 16:42
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Moes Tavern, Springfield
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fareast driver.. the aircraft was using an Ascot callsign (92 something) and the reg is zz330. dont believe all you see on planeplotter / sbs-1
opsjockey is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2012, 18:39
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Near the Thames
Age: 79
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
XV 277

Good point - but why on Easter Sunday or any other Sunday come to that? The new FY started on Friday anyway. I know - it was to prove to the inmates of Cartoon town how quiet it is. Not that they'd notice over the drone of another 6 hour Herc engine run!

1106

Last edited by Type1106; 9th Apr 2012 at 18:42. Reason: New thought
Type1106 is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2012, 18:40
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Erehwon
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Matter of interest, if the pods can be shucked when not needed, is there a software fix for the outer ailerons or some other way of achieving the same wing relief as with pods?

Or is it the other way around, WITH pods the flight controls software is tweaked?

Must change all the performance data too, LRC with pods would be quite significantly different without, I'd suspect etc etc

Oh my head is so full of Ess aitch eye tee . . .
Dengue_Dude is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2012, 19:26
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stab in the dark here dengue, but on modern FMS there is usually a drag index/additive value which can be modified. Baseline jet with no extras (aerials, panels removed, no pods) will be 0, with additives for each variation from standard.
VinRouge is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2012, 19:31
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Erehwon
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Danke Herr Kokinelli,

I appreciate the input, just raises questions in my head.

Erroneously, it appears, I assumed the 'fit' would remain the same whatever role it was being used in.

In my extreme ignorance, I'm wondering where all my taxes are going . . .
Dengue_Dude is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2012, 21:46
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: warwickshire
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why would she fly with wing pods if she's not doing an AR mission? pods are taken off / added as per the mission
What's the time penalty to add/ remove the pods? I fully appreciate the fuel/ performance aspects, though assumed it was a difficult job?
giblets is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2012, 23:16
  #98 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: uk
Age: 72
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it can be re-roled for freight and stretchers why no Freight door? After all, we spent a lot of money fitting them to the Tristar.
dragon166 is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2012, 19:06
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Anglia
Posts: 2,076
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Normally, "Freight" on an airliner goes into the "Hold" - normally under the floor through a large cargo door, or two, each big enough to accept normal freight pallets.

Freight does not normally get onto the Passenger Deck.

Normal Cargo Doors are normally mounted on the Left (Port) side for normal airline loading/unloading operations.

Tristars were only normal to begin with but were modified to not being normal by being capable of outsized freight movement - and C17's can do that now.

I would imagine that the big doors and the passenger decks were only used as a normal routine because they were there and someone had paid for the equipment to lift things up and put things through the door.

Most the "Freight" I saw carried on Tristar Decks could have fitted into baggage holds but the equipment to load them effectively didnt appear to be available at all stops?
Rigga is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2012, 20:09
  #100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1. AAR Pods don't work = Pods removed = no use in AAR role

2. DAS not fitted = no use in theatre AT role

1 + 2 = no use at all except on 'charter' type tasks = £10.7 bn toy

Annual charter bill approx £100m so (£10.7bn / £100m) gives 107 years before we make our money back

wtf...
wheezykid is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.