Fake User ID Problem. New Info 1950 11 March.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fake User ID Problem. New Info 1950 11 March.
This is directed at the member on the Military forum that is sending PM (Private Messages) under names that he has registered that very close to names of others in the Military forum. It is NOT directed at anyone else. You know who you are.
MY MESSAGE TO YOU IS:-
If you to not have the balls to have a man to man discussion or debate, heated or otherwise ON THE FORUM and need to resort to sending PM's imitating others to try to stir up trouble with people I know, then I pity you and I think most others would as well. The military ethos that I thought was picked up serving in the military has obviously been lost on you and you are no better than the many Walt's that turn up on Remembrance Day.
Examples of what has occured:-
ie I use 500N, they registered 5OON. I know of one other confirmed case (MILO xxxxx) and it was he who PM'd me with my "pseudo" message that I had sent him.
It is also ironic that Krueger Flap (now banned) was a slight change from another member Kreuger Flap. In my opinion, Krueger Flap (now banned) came back as Innocent man (banned as of today). Because it was KF who was always trying to "out" James Device and COCL2, I can only assume that the same person is connected to all this.
PPRuNe Pop has been notified by the other confirmed member
so we will wait to see what happens.
MY MESSAGE TO YOU IS:-
If you to not have the balls to have a man to man discussion or debate, heated or otherwise ON THE FORUM and need to resort to sending PM's imitating others to try to stir up trouble with people I know, then I pity you and I think most others would as well. The military ethos that I thought was picked up serving in the military has obviously been lost on you and you are no better than the many Walt's that turn up on Remembrance Day.
Examples of what has occured:-
ie I use 500N, they registered 5OON. I know of one other confirmed case (MILO xxxxx) and it was he who PM'd me with my "pseudo" message that I had sent him.
Originally Posted by 5OON
Yes, we are quite strong in PPRuNe and we know that you are the banned James Device and COCL2.
Yes, we are quite strong in PPRuNe and we know that you are the banned James Device and COCL2.
PPRuNe Pop has been notified by the other confirmed member
so we will wait to see what happens.
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Put quite simply, yesterday I received a number of mails from different user IDs accusing me of whatever, and basically of a threatening manner.
I can live with that, but whats annoying is that some of these mails have come from user IDs which clearly attempt to impersonate other users
For instance, the one referred to by 500N - which was sent from an account called 5OON.
Another sent from an account named "Milo minderbnider" - notice the similarity to my own account - which simply said "We are watching you COCL2. We are everywhere.
"
There was another, but I deleted ti before realising what was happening
These mails were in response to a reply I made on the James Blunt thread in respsnse to an asinine post by "Innocent man" - a post I removed within minutes after his posts were deleted and he was banned. The comments made made it clear that "Innocent man" and whoever PM'd me were one and the same
What really niggles is the way in which someone has deliberately attempted to contrive an argument between 500N and myself and also attempted to impersonate both him and myself. I can live with personal abuse - thees an "ignore" facility which will take care of that, but I don't care for misrepresentation by people posting apparently in my name (or others). The fake "Milo minderbnider" has already made posts in my name
This is very similar to the habit of the now banned mis-spelling "Kreuger flap" - who appears to have been attempting to impersonate the user "Krueger flap" - or maybe the other user "Kruegerflap",,,
I can live with that, but whats annoying is that some of these mails have come from user IDs which clearly attempt to impersonate other users
For instance, the one referred to by 500N - which was sent from an account called 5OON.
Another sent from an account named "Milo minderbnider" - notice the similarity to my own account - which simply said "We are watching you COCL2. We are everywhere.
"There was another, but I deleted ti before realising what was happening
These mails were in response to a reply I made on the James Blunt thread in respsnse to an asinine post by "Innocent man" - a post I removed within minutes after his posts were deleted and he was banned. The comments made made it clear that "Innocent man" and whoever PM'd me were one and the same
What really niggles is the way in which someone has deliberately attempted to contrive an argument between 500N and myself and also attempted to impersonate both him and myself. I can live with personal abuse - thees an "ignore" facility which will take care of that, but I don't care for misrepresentation by people posting apparently in my name (or others). The fake "Milo minderbnider" has already made posts in my name
This is very similar to the habit of the now banned mis-spelling "Kreuger flap" - who appears to have been attempting to impersonate the user "Krueger flap" - or maybe the other user "Kruegerflap",,,
How would anyone know, Hval? The mods may well be able to tell from the IP address. If the idea is to upset people and, thereby, give a little thrill to a sad individual, he can forget it. It makes no difference to me or my enjoyment of PPRuNe. I can only assume this is some spotty teenager with nothing better to do and who is not clever enough to write viruses; it's the same mentality.
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have no way of knowing
The wording used each time would suggest just one, but you can see what was said in the last PM to me: "we currently have...."
I suspect that its a case of useage of the "royal we" but only the sender knows for sure
The wording used each time would suggest just one, but you can see what was said in the last PM to me: "we currently have...."
I suspect that its a case of useage of the "royal we" but only the sender knows for sure
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Sunny (or Rainy) Somerset, England
Posts: 2,026
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It seems to be just one person, but the problem is that IP addresses are such a broad weapon and could well have a detrimental effect on others. There are at the moment 5 IPs that he is using.
I'll keep working on it but your best bet is not to respond in any way whatsoever (including starting threads like this) and just report any more idiotic posts or PMs to me. We had someone like this a year or so ago (it may even be the same person) and after he had no responses for a few months he gave up.
He is obviously very sad and child-like and craves attention, so - like any stupidly pathetic wayward child - the best treatment is to remove his stimulus by ignoring him.
I am retired and so have no problem with just sitting here and banning each new name he introduces.
I'll keep working on it but your best bet is not to respond in any way whatsoever (including starting threads like this) and just report any more idiotic posts or PMs to me. We had someone like this a year or so ago (it may even be the same person) and after he had no responses for a few months he gave up.
He is obviously very sad and child-like and craves attention, so - like any stupidly pathetic wayward child - the best treatment is to remove his stimulus by ignoring him.
I am retired and so have no problem with just sitting here and banning each new name he introduces.
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Sunny (or Rainy) Somerset, England
Posts: 2,026
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As one of the child's PMs indicates that he would love to see getting a huge number of fake IDs listed as banned, I shall not be notifying any banned names and have deleted the information previously given.
If you report the sad git's posts or PMs, then I shall let you know personally that whoever you report has been banned. He will not get the satisfaction of seeing an increasing number on his "I'm so very important" list.
Most especially ......... do NOT respond to any posts or PMs.
If you report the sad git's posts or PMs, then I shall let you know personally that whoever you report has been banned. He will not get the satisfaction of seeing an increasing number on his "I'm so very important" list.
Most especially ......... do NOT respond to any posts or PMs.
