Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Will Puma Survive?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Will Puma Survive?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th April 2012 | 20:03
  #321 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: England formerly Great Britain
All fair comment. although my opinion is that at BSN it is more down to professional aircrew (& GC) focused on a common objective to fully support the guys on the ground whilst staying alive themselves then a cohesion imposed/enforced by a HQ in Andover. In N.I. pre-Afg when the AAC, CHF & RAF were required to work together, they did. All other times it was a banter rich zone but that did not mean that mutual respect was absent. Many a time a blue guardian angel watched over the real workers after dark. JHC was a good idea but it is also based upon unrealistic idealism; and a cynic would say a back door attempt to get SH into a brown uniform without a mass exodus. In that aspect it is an ongoing failure and SDSR has been more divisive then any other event in recent military history. Jointery only works when individual identity is retained and respected and this is a big failing in JHC units.
Not that this has anything to do with the survival of Puma.
Admin_Guru is offline  
Reply
Old 9th April 2012 | 20:13
  #322 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
From: United Kingdom
How many Puma II are online now?

Not banter-bait, asking because I do not know.
Tiger_mate is offline  
Reply
Old 9th April 2012 | 20:28
  #323 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: God's own county
Admin,

Surely AAC, CHF/RN and RAF SH assets working together to stay alive and get the job done for the guys on the ground is the essence of the aim of JHC?!!!
Alexander.Yakovlev is offline  
Reply
Old 10th April 2012 | 16:55
  #324 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: in a state of flux
upsdaisy

Imaginary friend? Denigrating somebody you don't know. You are a bully, clearly. The very lowest excuse for a human. Your insult is obviously the desperate rambling of a lost soul without purpose. If you were not a bully, I would pity you.
As for your thread idea - do i- I'm in. It's staying where it is.

Last edited by chopabeefer; 10th April 2012 at 20:42.
chopabeefer is offline  
Reply
Old 9th May 2012 | 09:16
  #325 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Borderline England
You'll get the keys when you pass the OCF.

Good luck with that.
Unchecked is offline  
Reply
Old 9th May 2012 | 17:16
  #326 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,046
Likes: 28
From: Zummerset
Would that literally be "chopping for job security"??
Evalu8ter is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 11:56
  #327 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: U.K.
North Sea 225 ditching

Out of interest do the UK mil puma 1 or 2 have the same gearbox that has now led to the grounding of much of the civvy super puma fleet?
Spanish Waltzer is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2012 | 16:31
  #328 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,174
Likes: 7
From: UK
Depends on the hours. As far as I know the fleet leader among the RAF Pumas is about 12,500 hrs. I think the gearbox is lifed at 3,200 hrs which would mean that the last gearbox change was ten years ago which was way before this dodgy shaft came into existance.

IIRC the oil pump is mounted on the back of the gearbox with the hydraulics and alternators so it does not have the same oil pump system as the 332 and 225.

Last edited by Fareastdriver; 26th October 2012 at 16:50.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2012 | 08:12
  #329 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 632
Likes: 3
From: UK
So when do both Sqns stop flying Puma1?
Could be the last? is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2012 | 10:05
  #330 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,174
Likes: 7
From: UK
31st December 2012.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2012 | 11:45
  #331 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 1
From: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Originally Posted by Spanish Waltzer
Out of interest do the UK mil puma 1 or 2 have the same gearbox that has now led to the grounding of much of the civvy super puma fleet?
No, different box (/shaft). Same for the KAI Surion.

I/C
Ian Corrigible is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.