Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Tornado GR4 - Given a hard time?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Tornado GR4 - Given a hard time?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th May 2011, 19:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Up North
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tornado GR4 - Given a hard time?

Guys/Girls

I shall start with the fact that this is not a troll!!!

Having worked for a good few years on the GR4 and F3 and lost many a day to their foibles!!! I still have a great soft spot for the pair of them, with the recent demise of the F3 and the general kicking it has received . It has got me thinking, is the GR4 going to get the same treatment despite the fact that it has plodded away over the years and achieved pretty much all that has been asked of it and its air/ground crews. I don't want to this to turn into a 'Harrier was better and cheaper thread' just a bit a poll as the thoughts on the GR4?
sturb199 is offline  
Old 13th May 2011, 19:50
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,780
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Harrier was better and cheaper.

That's the thread finished then
Trim Stab is offline  
Old 13th May 2011, 20:06
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Up North
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice one num nuts!!!!
sturb199 is offline  
Old 13th May 2011, 20:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Uranus
Posts: 958
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
I'll rise to your challenge Trim Stab - how many Harrier and Tornado hours do you have? Where did you get your figures from (please don't say from that muppet Tourist and his vitriolic drivel)?

Obviously the Harrier is not cheaper or better (unless you're talking about going backwards at Airshows that is a particularly useful tactic for operations!). STOVL is about the only area that Harrier has the advantage - whoopy do, only really ever used in the Falklands, all recent conflicts have been conventional take offs.

Sturb199 - in answer to you're question, the venerable "Fin" did/does great work in Iraq (1st time and 2nd time), Kosovo, Afghanistan and now Libya. It's pretty hard to knock now that the crews have stopped trying to fly it like a Vulcan (once that mafia had left by the late 90s).

The B Word
The B Word is offline  
Old 13th May 2011, 20:50
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Up North
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's pretty hard to knock now that the crews have stopped trying to fly it like a Vulcan (once that mafia had left by the late 90s).
Thanks for the reply, do tell more about this issues, it's something before my time?
sturb199 is offline  
Old 13th May 2011, 21:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Longton, Lancs, UK
Age: 80
Posts: 1,527
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
sturb

Expect a rash of inane replies from young numpties (and not so young) that infect these sort of threads. A remark for which I'll be flamed. Others will be more helpful.
jindabyne is offline  
Old 13th May 2011, 23:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: scotland
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To be honest (and this is from an Engineer's point of view) have always found the GR4 to be a loveable rogue, whoever designed certained aspects quite clearly thought about the maintenance aspects, easy access panels, quick rectification though LRUs etc. However the ECS system for example is an utter dog's dinner and less said about the engines the better (disabled by a Navigator's map........typically on a Friday afternoon).
Still, excluding BAe's attempt to charge the earth for every nut and bolt not a bad wee thing.

ps. Harriers were better.
light_my_spey is offline  
Old 14th May 2011, 04:57
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: YORKS
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I bet the Harriers didn't fire flares at each other whilst trying to take photos and then try and claim they were shot...........!!!???
3 bladed beast is offline  
Old 14th May 2011, 05:53
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Harriers were better - at what?? Hovering and crashing in the circuit - that's it!
navibrator is offline  
Old 14th May 2011, 06:35
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chippenham, Wilts
Age: 75
Posts: 297
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The B word

"It's pretty hard to knock now that the crews have stopped trying to fly it like a Vulcan (once that mafia had left by the late 90s)."

Yes, I would also like an explanation please

3P



threeputt is offline  
Old 14th May 2011, 06:46
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Hampshire physically; Perthshire and Pembrokeshire mentally.
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's pretty hard to knock now that the crews have stopped trying to fly it like a Vulcan (once that mafia had left by the late 90s)."
Some of us here were doing our damndest to prevent them looking on it purely as a Vulcan replacement in the first place. I remember one particular "nav" in the bar at Cottesmore in '83 saying something along the lines of "I don't like punchy types" to an assembled company of ex-Bucc/F4/Jag/Lightning and Harrier pilots. He didn't last long.
Wingswinger is offline  
Old 14th May 2011, 06:50
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Great Britain
Age: 51
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
I'm pretty sure I know what he's hinting at. When the Vulcan chaps came to the Tonka they flew similar tactics to how they'd been doing previously - low level "on time and track" somewhat inflexible attacks. Once they started flying more flexibly using multi-axis, multi-level and flexible attacks they fared far better on Cope Thunder and Red Flag against the newer Air Defence tactics - a tactic that became a blurring between CAS, BAI and Strike.

Not a dig at the Vulcan force, just a statement that things moved on (for the better IMHO).

Cpl Clott
Corporal Clott is offline  
Old 14th May 2011, 07:36
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Uranus
Posts: 958
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Clott et al

Exactly! It was the same for the F3 with some of the Lightning and Phantom mates (Jehovah!) introducing things that didn't make the best of what the newer jet could deliver. As you say, not a dig at the legacy aircraft type and I guess the Typhoon force had/has the same problem with ex-Tornado (both types), Jaguar and Harrier mates with "when I was on...we used to do...".

That said, some read accross of tactics can be a good thing as well as long it is not a mafia. I also remember that the ex-Bucaneer mates made the transition to Tornado far better than the Vulcan mates (which given their experience isn't that surprising).

The B Word
The B Word is offline  
Old 14th May 2011, 08:01
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NOTTINGHAM
Posts: 758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having grown up with the Bucc, I don't think it's fair to lambaste the Tornado Force alone about its V-Force incomers! At one point, HQ1Gp which had governed the V-Force and was now running the Bucc Force amongst others, decided that it would be a good idea to retrofit a sextant in the Bucc's rear cockpit!! Needless to say that never happened! I recall also, as a Bucc OCU Nav instructor, sitting behind an ex-V-Force pilot who opened the cockpit conversation with 'Captain to Navigator' - he didn't ever do it again!!!!! He was the original VFW!

However, it is true to say that there was a large V-Force intake to the early GR1 sqns and many found it difficult to adapt from the 'strategic' Vulcan to the 'tactical' Tornado. I was in Germany, late 80s, on the GR1 with a number of them who attempted to drive the Tornado just like they had the V-Bomber. Those pilots flew it straight and level and some ex-V-Force navs never looked out the window but followed the green writing as if it was their God! However, many, like 3-Putt, were not in that category and were as tactically aware as those who had come off FJs previously. The others lolled about in the doldrums of the squadron and didn't advance much beyond 2-ship lead!

Foldie

Last edited by foldingwings; 14th May 2011 at 09:08. Reason: Spelling police have PM'd me!!!!!!!
foldingwings is offline  
Old 14th May 2011, 08:10
  #15 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Remember too that the GR1 took part in the Giant Voice Strategic bombing competitions. Someone clearly thought it was a strategic bomber, bit like an FB111 Lite. Did rather well too even at high level bombing on 6 hour missions.

Did rather too well IIRC and was not invited a second time.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 14th May 2011, 10:26
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Hampshire physically; Perthshire and Pembrokeshire mentally.
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Indeed. I may speak as one of the 617 Sqn winners in '84.
Wingswinger is offline  
Old 14th May 2011, 13:30
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Harriers were better - at what?? Hovering and crashing in the circuit - that's it!
Better at not having navs?
Sashathehungry is offline  
Old 14th May 2011, 13:38
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: wales
Posts: 462
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At the end of the day its all down to cost , not long ago we had tonka/jaguar/harrier all doing different jobs with some overlap and as mentioned before once we'd lost the vulcan the tonka took on that role. Also look at cost history when you look at running costs in the tonka/harrier debate. Its only in the last few years that things changed to get a more cost effective maint system going that got the harrier costs down and availability up.
bvcu is offline  
Old 14th May 2011, 14:56
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,021
Received 2,902 Likes on 1,243 Posts
Didn't they melt down a F3 Tonka to make a bell? that wouldn't ring true either...... rather apt to end as a bell that's ring isn't quite right.....

NutLoose is offline  
Old 14th May 2011, 17:35
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: England
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was a GR4 over Spadeadam on Thursday 14.15 very low level. So impressive it was that my off roader left the A69 as i watched, and entered its natural habitat of the open countryside at just under 60mph. Into the garage tomorrow for a £500 repair bill!
tonker is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.