Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Lossie saved, Leuchars to the Army

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Lossie saved, Leuchars to the Army

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th May 2011, 05:41
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 45 yards from a tropical beach
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, makin' mock o' uniforms that guard you while you sleep
Is cheaper than them uniforms, an' they're starvation cheap;
An' hustlin' drunken soldiers when they're goin' large a bit
Is five times better business than paradin' in full kit.
Then it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Tommy, 'ow's yer soul?"
But it's "Thin red line of 'eroes" when the drums begin to roll,
The drums begin to roll, my boys, the drums begin to roll,
O it's "Thin red line of 'eroes" when the drums begin to roll.
Not a lot has changed since Kipling's day.
Neptunus Rex is offline  
Old 12th May 2011, 06:53
  #62 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Finningley Boy
by nature of the kind of service environment and culture they are brought up in, means at the very least, local perceptions aside, there will be an increased likelihood of larger groups of young men with "attitude" shall we say, looking for a good time on Friday and Saturday night.
You mean like Doncaster and Rotherham. In fact in the former probably since Roman times.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 12th May 2011, 10:13
  #63 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,091
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Finningley Boy - Where were you based in the UK and were so embarrassed by your Army colleagues?
parabellum is offline  
Old 12th May 2011, 13:49
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,854
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
Finningley Boy - Where were you based in the UK and were so embarrassed by your Army colleagues?
My greater experience of the Army was in Germany and Belize, and no I wasn't embarrassed by them personally. Indeed, the ones from the Royal Signals and R.A.O.C. for the most part, whom I worked with and lived alongside down at Birkenfeld in Germany were a fantastic bunch. I was at one point thinking of transferring over. But when out in Belize and in Wes Berlin, as I've pointed out earlier, the behaviour of the Infantry, shall we say, and for the reasons given, young lads embued with a tribal mentality, may well make a noticeable difference to the atmosphere in certain parts of the country, you've read the story about the Black Watch. That said, they had a particular reputation, even among Scottish Regiments.

I used to get plenty of stories from the army chums at Birkenfeld, who like us from the R.A.F. regarded Birkenfeld as a holiday away from it all. We were all under the U.K. Support Unit at Ramstein AB, billeted at Neubrucke and later at Birkenfeld and the actual place of work was the Comcen and various EACs and Ops Cells at the NATO Central Region Static War Headquarters. It was without a shadow of a doubt, the best tour I ever had and none the less so for the Army being there. But I learnt something from them and at first hand about the line units shall we say. Not that it worried me in particular but regarding Leuchars, to be perfectly honest, there probably are only subjective arguments for it remaining an R.A.F. Station. That said the arguments for moving everything up to Lossiemouth and moving the Army in there are not built around any clear military thinking, or I imagine this would have been part and parcel of the SDSR or arranged many years ago. The question about moving the R.A.F. from Leuchars surfaced only last October, and then only because of the reaction of the Lossiemouth community that they could experience a double economic blow from the additional closure of Lossiemouth as well as Kinloss. If the Army are moving back from Germany in the future, then what is the argument against them moving into Lossiemouth and Kinloss, considering the greater availability of infrastructure and being on the doorstep of a more realistic training ground. Also, the economic argument is solved. But now the problem has grown tentacles and people have gotten tunnel visioned thinking that the R.A.F. must remain at Lossiemouth at all costs, hence Leuchars is unnecessarily dragged into the debate.

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 12th May 2011, 22:27
  #65 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,091
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Finningly Boy, very understandable that the RAF wouldn't want to lose Leuchars. If the Army have to move north what would be so wrong with them going to either Lossie or Kinloss, I agree, but as for working out the logic, that, as our American friends would say, is way above my pay grade!

Our family regiment is the Black Watch! The bit in blue under my ID is their motto from the cap badge! They can be a bit high spirited at times
parabellum is offline  
Old 13th May 2011, 13:40
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Oswestry
Age: 77
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A "hanger" is for clothes, a "hangar" is for aeroplanes.
Steve Bond is offline  
Old 14th May 2011, 06:05
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was hoping we would pull out of Scotland completely. It's miles away and the Scots hate us. So why do we stay?
navibrator is offline  
Old 14th May 2011, 11:01
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Welwyn Garden City
Age: 63
Posts: 1,854
Received 77 Likes on 43 Posts
As a Jockshireman who lives in Ingurland all I can say is three cheers for the act of Union!

FB
Finningley Boy is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 06:52
  #69 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,405
Received 1,591 Likes on 728 Posts
Torygraph: Defence shake-up means our smallest Army since the Boer War

The reorganisation will see the Army shrink to its smallest size since the Boer War, while Britain’s reserve forces will benefit from a £1.5 billion investment programme........

In a separate development it is understood that RAF Leuchars is to close, leaving only one RAF airbase in Scotland. The site will become an Army barracks.

The Sunday Telegraph understands that the Ministry of Defence has secured extra funding from the Treasury in the next spending round, after 2013, of £1.5 billion to pay for the overhaul of the reserve forces as well as more funding for the equipment programme. The extra cash will pay for 14 Chinooks, which are due to come into service after 2014, three new Rivet surveillance aircraft and upgrades to the Army fleet of ageing Warrior armoured vehicles.........

The closure of RAF Leuchars will leave Scotland with just one functioning RAF base at Lossiemouth, currently home to a Tornado GR4 Squadron. The new barracks at the Leuchars site will house thousands of soldiers due to be withdrawn from Germany in the next few years. The decision to transfer the two typhoon squadrons currently based at Leuchars to RAF Lossiemouth was only finalised last Friday, although rumours of the move had been circulating for months.

It will also be announced that RAF Marham in Norfolk — another Tornado base — will remain open, primarily because it is the only Tornado servicing facility.
ORAC is online now  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 08:53
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fife
Age: 87
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAF Leuchars is to close....................The site will become an Army barracks.
Ah well, there goes the neighbourhood.....
NutherA2 is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 09:14
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Luberon
Age: 72
Posts: 953
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Quote:
RAF Leuchars is to close....................The site will become an Army barracks.

Originally Posted by NutherA2
Ah well, there goes the neighbourhood.....
A good friend of mine, who is a lawyer specialising in court martial work, is based in Tayside and gets a fair number of "clients" from the RAF at Leuchars. The prospect of the army taking over has him rubbing his hands with glee.
sitigeltfel is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 09:17
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Racedo blows goats
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"£1.5 billion to pay for the overhaul of the reserve forces as well as more funding for the equipment programme. The extra cash will pay for 14 Chinooks, which are due to come into service after 2014, three new Rivet surveillance aircraft and upgrades to the Army fleet of ageing Warrior armoured vehicles"

Must be a car boot sale somewhere, that is a lot of kit for that money.
engineer(retard) is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 10:25
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: East Anglia
Age: 74
Posts: 789
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
A simple question; can anyone explain why we are buying aircraft to survey Rivets?
1.3VStall is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 11:07
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 270
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A simple question; can anyone explain why we are buying aircraft to survey Rivets?
Because you can survey them quicker (and therefore more of them in the same time) than if you had to walk
MFC_Fly is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 13:48
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: London UK
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So are we getting cuts post-2015 or increases? Mike Smith in the Sunday Times today says Osborne has refused to a 2% increase in resources after 2015. But then he goes on to say that the Cabinet has said we can have a 2% increase in the equipment budget but not in anything else. As ever my brain is clearly not large enough to comprehend how you can increase the number of platforms you buy but not the air and ground crew you need to fly them.
elderlypart-timer is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 13:54
  #76 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E P-T,

As ever my brain is clearly not large enough to comprehend how you can increase the number of platforms you buy but not the air and ground crew you need to fly them.
I think that the answer is that the equipment programme is so far short of balance that a 2% increase can be absorbed easily [and will still fail to provide the] kit for a smaller force.

S41
Squirrel 41 is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 14:37
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Age: 54
Posts: 503
Received 40 Likes on 10 Posts
but not the air and ground crew you need to fly them
The answer could also be in the Torygraph article through the proposed use of cheaper reserve forces to do some of the other "stuff" that our manpower do. Thus you will now have the manpower to do the core air power business of flying aircraft.

iRaven
iRaven is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 19:13
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As ever my brain is clearly not large enough to comprehend how you can increase the number of platforms you buy but not the air and ground crew you need to fly them.
Sadly George hasn't comprehended it either! I suppose a pay rise will be out of the question?
ghostnav is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2011, 07:17
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: the far south
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 13 Posts
Leuchars loses fight to be RAF's home in Scotland - Scotsman.com Heritage & Culture

Surely all the GR4s can not be squeezed into Marham, even if 1/2 the force is away on ops?

Will some stay at Lossie or will more GR4 Sqns get the chop?

TR
typerated is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2011, 09:11
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chilling out on the water if it's warm enough
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely all the GR4s can not be squeezed into Marham, even if 1/2 the force is away on ops?

Will some stay at Lossie or will more GR4 Sqns get the chop?
I know which I would guess at post 'Stan & Libya
Chainkicker is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.