Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

LIBYA (Merged) Use this thread ONLY

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

LIBYA (Merged) Use this thread ONLY

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Mar 2011, 01:21
  #421 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MOD PRESS STATEMENT

The Chief of Defence Staff’s Strategic Communications Officer Major General John Lorimer said:

“British Armed Forces, as authorised by the UN Security Council Resolution 1973, have participated in a co-ordinated strike against Libyan Air Defence systems. In addition to the Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles (TLAM) launched from a Trafalgar Class submarine, I can now confirm that the RAF has also launched Stormshadow missiles from a number of Tornado GR4 fast jets, which flew direct from RAF Marham as part of a coordinated coalition plan to enforce the resolution.”

Defence Secretary Dr Liam Fox said:

“We made clear that if Gaddafi did not comply with the UN Security Council Resolution 1973, it would be enforced through military action. Our Armed Forces have therefore participated in a co-ordinated international coalition strike against key military installations.

“We have launched Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles from a Trafalgar Class submarine and Stormshadow missiles from Tornado GR4s. The fast jets flew 3,000 miles from RAF Marham and back making this the longest range bombing mission conducted by the RAF since the Falklands conflict. This operation was supported by VC10 and Tristar air-to-air refuelling aircraft as well as E3D Sentry and Sentinel surveillance aircraft.

“HMS Westminster is off the coast of Libya and HMS Cumberland is in the region ready to support operations. Typhoon aircraft are also standing by to provide support.

“Our capable and adaptable Armed Forces are once again displaying their courage and professionalism. This action has provided a strong signal - the International community will not stand by while the Libyan people suffer under the Gaddafi regime.”

TJ
TEEEJ is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2011, 01:46
  #422 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,792
Received 78 Likes on 35 Posts
Well done to all at Marham - which now joins Bruggen in the list of MOBs to have directly hosted offensive operations in recent years. And well done also to the AAR crews; I guess we have a new power projection case study to sit alongside the Black Buck and Kosovo raids!
Easy Street is online now  
Old 20th Mar 2011, 01:48
  #423 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Exit stage right.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
100+ Tomahawks 24 hours after a UN resolution? There's a signal there somewhere.

Although I'm uncertain regarding the long term political objectives.
Avid reader of the Wikileaks website here and appears Libya has been renegotiating Oil leases downwards over last couple of years making lots of oil companies pay lots more for less share.

Sarkozy facing relection and wanting to prove how tough he is but bet Libya will start showing how much cash he has gotten over the years.
racedo is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2011, 02:04
  #424 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Having staged my Tornado through Sigonella during a war on a Sunday, I know why the boys & girls crossed their legs and flew back to Marham!
The longest unit of time, after the eon, is the "Italian bowser driver's lunch"
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2011, 02:31
  #425 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 516 Likes on 215 Posts
3000 mile long shuttle....now that is unrelenting pressure!

Seems a bit shorter than what the USAF had to do years ago as the French were hard headed about our using their Airspace for a raid by F-111's on Libya.

Good on the folks involved in the operation.....the Lib's are now engaged with first class forces!
SASless is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2011, 02:44
  #426 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hong Kong SAR
Age: 80
Posts: 321
Received 26 Likes on 9 Posts
On a slightly more light-hearted note:

The MOD have removed Libya from the list of Countries who can file an on-line complaint regarding military low-flying.

Ministry of Defence | Contact us | Low Flying Complaints

Must be someone's job to keep this up to date....

_____________________

Now the die is cast - good luck to our guys and gals.
CISTRS is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2011, 05:23
  #427 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Muscat, Oman
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When this is over, can we get back on with scrapping the aircraft and ships that we don't need?
Ali Barber is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2011, 06:42
  #428 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Capt P U G Wash,

"FB11, you are clearly from the school of the Tripwire Strategy - escalation and de-escalation obviously not part of your game plan."

and of course:

"FB, I guess the UN believed my argument more!"

Maybe you should talk to the UN and let them know they've made a mistake? You can send them a copy of the FIH at the same time and explain it would have been much better to demonstrate intent by wing-waggling.

Unless taking down the IADS isn't a tripwire strategy?
FB11 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2011, 06:49
  #429 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: US
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now that the UK, US and France have reacted to Gaddaffi people will begin asking why we did not respond to Mugabe or even the riots in Egypt that have argueably sparked the current turmoil.
Oh brother, here we go again!

They say ignorance is bliss but please prunes .. do 5 mins research before posting!

Let me say this loud and clear as someone with 15 years in US government service with .. how shall I put this .. let's just say 'priviledged access to certain information':

The regimes in Morocco, Tunisia, Egypt, Yemen, Bahrain and Saudi cannot be compared with that of Gadaffi, to understand this read: http://www.pprune.org/military-aircr...l-gadaffi.html

HM
Hell Man is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2011, 07:06
  #430 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: korat thailand
Age: 83
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^^Quote When this is over, can we get back on with scrapping the aircraft and ships that we don't need?


“Hang on! It’s the Prime Minister. Can we put it all back together again?”

Last edited by crippen; 20th Mar 2011 at 07:34.
crippen is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2011, 07:23
  #431 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bristol
Age: 56
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Surely you understand the difference between the Libya situation and the revolution in Egypt? In Libya there has been wholesale employment of the apparatus of the state against its own people. In Egypt, the Army effectively ended up protecting the protesters, who in turn were (broadly) peaceful. So there is no comparison whatsoever between the two."

Oddly, that looks just like a comparison to me......So perhaps you can

Next on the list:
I well remember one particular PPRUNER who was aghast at seeing a Noraid collection while at a USAF function!

Now to the real purpose of my post.

God bless the French for starting this off, due to at least having enough aircraft to take part. Keep safe to the French and Other forces taking part in this action, not least the RAF who are using old aircraft sourced from stupidly overstretched resources. That the RAF can mount this action, while still (only just) covering other theatres is bordering on miraculous IMHO.

This is not 'can do', but 'can do, and then a bit more with one hand behind your back'.
barnstormer1968 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2011, 07:27
  #432 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So the UK forces are having to fly 3000 mile round trips to attack Libya.

A week after it is scrapped our one and only aircraft carrier is now really needed. Nice one David
LTNman is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2011, 08:00
  #433 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: YES
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder If the US had pushed "OP Eldarado Canyon" would we be in this position?

The Americans always had a Green spectled view of the "Old" country I wonder how they would have reacted to cross border raids into the Irish Republic and tactics they have been using in Afghanistan & Iraq if we'd applied them in Ireland.

why is no one talking about HMS Illustrious? the Invincible class was 3 carriers!
NURSE is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2011, 08:01
  #434 (permalink)  
AR1
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Age: 63
Posts: 710
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
I said destination unknown, could be destination an Italian or Greek airbase!
But just in case, you could calculate a TOT.

our one and only aircraft carrier is now really needed
I dont think that is proven at all. Yes nice to have. But really needed would mean we couldn't get aircraft over the target.
AR1 is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2011, 08:13
  #435 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: South Wales
Age: 63
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hell Man,

There are not many people here who don’t agree with the fact Gadhafi is an evil man and needs to be toppled.

But let me put a couple of simple questions to you:

Are we doing this in the name of democracy and to allow people freedom or are we doing it to topple Gadhafi, because he is a bad man?

Is it acceptable to allow the leaders of Bahrain, Saudi or wherever to cause civilian deaths because the people of those countries demonstrating also want democracy and freedom?
SRENNAPS is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2011, 08:16
  #436 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Midlands
Age: 84
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We still have a carrier SFAIK - it is in re-fit at the moment. Even if we did have one available what would we be flying from it to enforce a NFZ?
A2QFI is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2011, 08:19
  #437 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So the UK forces are having to fly 3000 mile round trips to attack Libya.

A week after it is scrapped our one and only aircraft carrier is now really needed. Nice one David
I don't think it is all his fault. He has obviously been convinced (by blinkered, jack tts) to cut flexible and effective assets (but thats another post).

Surely an Aircraft Carrier in the Med would be more 'cost effective' (than 4 Tornados having to be refuelled to fly 3000 miles to drop a few bombs - maybe not as ridiculous as the Vulcan raids during the Falklands) and more importantly more flexible to react to circumstances on the ground i.e. quicker to respond?
BritAir is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2011, 08:20
  #438 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So the UK forces are having to fly 3000 mile round trips to attack Libya.

A week after it is scrapped our one and only aircraft carrier is now really needed.
It depends on level of effort.

Operating GR4s from a secure rear area with established logistics chain using stand off weapons is a good way to go at this stage. If the sortie rate ramps up or sortie durations (say CAP) increase then a FOB might be a better idea.

Until the Libyan OCA forces are degraded a tad more sitting a carrier within range might not be smart. I'm afraid this op with plenty of potential NATO FOBs surrounding the AOR is not a good justification for the carriers.
Geehovah is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2011, 08:21
  #439 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: UK
Age: 52
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What's wrong with all these blinkered fools who keep whingeing about the RN's loss of the carriers? This had no bearing on this op whatsoever! The fact is that the RAF are able to conduct 3000nm bombing ops; it's one of the reasons why they are around rather than relying solely on comparitively short-range embarked aircraft. Did they need to mount the op from 1500nm away? Clearly 'their airships' decided that on this occasion they did for whatever reason, but there are other options for basing in the region one would have thought that you would imagine would be explored for sustained ops.

So rather than constantly bemoaning loss of one capability, why not say well done to the crews that are displaying a different one. Well done fellas, fly safe.
Pol Potty mouth is offline  
Old 20th Mar 2011, 08:25
  #440 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,048
Received 2,920 Likes on 1,249 Posts
From guardian.co.uk:

12.21am: A message on Libyan state television says the Libyan government had decided to end efforts to stop illegal immigration into Europe, citing a security source. ...

Gadaffi thinks he's let loose his ultimate weapon, but he's wrong, 'cuz all enlightened Europeans welcome more diversity. It's pervasive!
No longer a problem as those that want to leave are using Egypt or Tunisia as their Countries of choice, the fact does not appear to have sank in that they were probably fleeing Libya in the first place to get away from him.........
NutLoose is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.