AOC 1 Gp breaks ranks
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Gamekeeper has turned Poacher:
Obviously the Lord of the Manor is not treating his staff sufficiently well to maintain absolute loyalty. Whilst others remain in search of higher esteem to the detriment of all they serve. Clearly one is a politician and the other a Leader of men.
Obviously the Lord of the Manor is not treating his staff sufficiently well to maintain absolute loyalty. Whilst others remain in search of higher esteem to the detriment of all they serve. Clearly one is a politician and the other a Leader of men.
I seem to remember some time ago predicting that the RN would end up with Rafales. Interesting now that Bagwell is talking about the same possibility.
There would have to be a trade the other way, so the French will probably end up leasing some of our FSTAs.
I wonder even whether they might be persuaded to take some of our Typhoons in air defence role. That way Dassault could concentrate development on the strike versions of Rafale, and Typhoon could be left in a dedicated air-defence role.
There would have to be a trade the other way, so the French will probably end up leasing some of our FSTAs.
I wonder even whether they might be persuaded to take some of our Typhoons in air defence role. That way Dassault could concentrate development on the strike versions of Rafale, and Typhoon could be left in a dedicated air-defence role.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: the earth
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does all read quite well until the last paragraph. The best thing the AOC can do now is stand by his remarks. Who cares if CAS doesn't agree? I haven't found many Service people who agreed with the Chiefs (all 3) letter supporting the SDR.
The disconnect between what your average Service person (commisioned amd non-commisioned) is thinking at what the hierarchy is telling them is staggering. Finally a serving Air Officer is saying what everyone in the crewrooms has been saying for months. Good for you and stick by your guns...all be it it's not the fastest way to getting 3*, but at least its leadership not politics.
The disconnect between what your average Service person (commisioned amd non-commisioned) is thinking at what the hierarchy is telling them is staggering. Finally a serving Air Officer is saying what everyone in the crewrooms has been saying for months. Good for you and stick by your guns...all be it it's not the fastest way to getting 3*, but at least its leadership not politics.
Guest
Posts: n/a
I accept that in this day and age working with allies is the name of the game. OK, so we might have some of our boys and girls flying Rafale - twinning 3 Sqn with a Rafale Sqn - (and maybe they get a go on our Typhoons?) But why do we not have a much closer relationship with the Luftwaffe? We do fly the same cabs, after all? Yes, Germany doesn't have any carriers but you can't land a Tiffie on a deck either.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes
on
16 Posts
Trim Stab - He doesn't mention the RN having Rafaels, just the possibility of 'British officers' flying them.
That could mean on exchange.
That could mean on exchange.
And yet, when he took over from Torpy, Dalton is on record as having said:
Kudos to AOC 1 Gp, but how is it, Dalton, that some of the RAF's 'operational commitments' (which I've highlighted in bold above) suddenly aren't needed anymore?
Out of interest, how much of her annual budget does Belgium fritter away on overseas aid to wealthier countries, or on state handouts to economic migrants?
"I am very conscious of the enormous privilege and responsibility that I have been given as the Chief of the Air Staff to lead the Royal Air Force over the next few years. I recognise that I take on this honour at a time when the RAF is continuing to make the vital and highly effective contribution to the UK Armed Forces' enduring military operations in Afghanistan.
"Combining these with the RAF's other operational commitments - 24/7 protection of United Kingdom airspace, the continuing obligation for the protection of the Falkland Islands, maritime air operations around the UK and search and rescue missions across the UK - means that the Royal Air Force is exceptionally busy."
"Combining these with the RAF's other operational commitments - 24/7 protection of United Kingdom airspace, the continuing obligation for the protection of the Falkland Islands, maritime air operations around the UK and search and rescue missions across the UK - means that the Royal Air Force is exceptionally busy."
Out of interest, how much of her annual budget does Belgium fritter away on overseas aid to wealthier countries, or on state handouts to economic migrants?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Am I happy to be down at that number [eight squadrons] next April? No, it worries the hell out of me,” he said. “I can just about do Operation Herrick [Afghanistan], and the QRAs [air defence operations]. Can I do other things? Yes, but it is at risk
It's "we" as in lots of us, not "I" as in me alone.
I once witnessed the sailor bloke West flash up a power point of a Carrier referring to it as "this is me in the Med" like some sort of holiday snap (about as interesting). Pompous A**e.
OFO, there is more:
""Should we get the buybacks out of Saudi Arabia and Oman as planned, we will be back to the number of Typhoons I need," he said. "At the moment, if I don't get the [Omani] buyback and this is under discussion ... it could take me down to 95 aircraft."
Poor guy, it must be tough having his own air force!
""Should we get the buybacks out of Saudi Arabia and Oman as planned, we will be back to the number of Typhoons I need," he said. "At the moment, if I don't get the [Omani] buyback and this is under discussion ... it could take me down to 95 aircraft."
Poor guy, it must be tough having his own air force!
The next Cameron stands up and starts droning on about defence of the nation being the first priority of any government, may be someone should ask him how exactly we are supposed to do that:
The Air Force has scrapped its maritime capabilities, is binning the majority of its ISTAR platforms (despite ISTAR being the buzzword of the day), has an ancient AT fleet that is falling apart with replacements coming under the heading of 'jam tomorrow' and an attack capability now being compared to Belgium's by the very person charged with leading it.
The Navy has taken out a sub-prime mortgage for 2 carriers that won't have any aircraft, at the expense of a surface fleet that is frankly outnumbered by the number of toy boats in my bath.
Whilst the Army, who appear to be doing very well at the moment, are clinging on by virtue of the fact that the politicians have gone for the 'The War' argument, an argument which is null and void post-2015 and which will leave the Army with a lot of specialist kit for light infantry dominated, 1920/30s style policing conflicts and little else. But lets not forget that post-2015 is when the Army will be sliced and diced.
So where does that leave defence of the UK the Prime Minister? And before you start trying to tell us about the high tech capabilities we have, remember one thing: Typhoon, JSF, T-45s etc may well be a the cutting edge of technology, but they can't be in 2 places at once.
This is going to make Churchill's wilderness years look like a feast for defence spending.
The Air Force has scrapped its maritime capabilities, is binning the majority of its ISTAR platforms (despite ISTAR being the buzzword of the day), has an ancient AT fleet that is falling apart with replacements coming under the heading of 'jam tomorrow' and an attack capability now being compared to Belgium's by the very person charged with leading it.
The Navy has taken out a sub-prime mortgage for 2 carriers that won't have any aircraft, at the expense of a surface fleet that is frankly outnumbered by the number of toy boats in my bath.
Whilst the Army, who appear to be doing very well at the moment, are clinging on by virtue of the fact that the politicians have gone for the 'The War' argument, an argument which is null and void post-2015 and which will leave the Army with a lot of specialist kit for light infantry dominated, 1920/30s style policing conflicts and little else. But lets not forget that post-2015 is when the Army will be sliced and diced.
So where does that leave defence of the UK the Prime Minister? And before you start trying to tell us about the high tech capabilities we have, remember one thing: Typhoon, JSF, T-45s etc may well be a the cutting edge of technology, but they can't be in 2 places at once.
This is going to make Churchill's wilderness years look like a feast for defence spending.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Erehwon
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Got to agree.
Obviously a new drill has been added to the checklist.
BOTTLE switch . . . . . . . . . Select OUT
Shame that, it was going so well. They've probably levelled a few threats they've got left over from the Assange debacle . . .
Obviously a new drill has been added to the checklist.
BOTTLE switch . . . . . . . . . Select OUT
Shame that, it was going so well. They've probably levelled a few threats they've got left over from the Assange debacle . . .
Last edited by Dengue_Dude; 19th Dec 2010 at 10:39. Reason: Danged grammar
Gentleman Aviator
Can't quite understand his banter about "only six squadrons left in the RAF". Even if you leave out 22, 202 (and 84*) we've still got 7, 18, 27, 28, 33, 78 and 230 .......
Duh! NOW I get it .......
Perhaps Air Sec, AMP and/or ACAS should tell him .......
*Edited to add: and 60(R)
Duh! NOW I get it .......
Perhaps Air Sec, AMP and/or ACAS should tell him .......
*Edited to add: and 60(R)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Back in Geordie Land
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just when I felt I was going to have to eat my words and retract all those comments I've made about out VSOs not having any ba££s, it would appear that I was correct all along.
And, just when I thought 'at last, someone close to the top is making a statement' I find it was all in the wrong context. And of course we then get good old CAS steaming in telling us all he doesn't agree with his AOC. What a bunch of clowns we have running what's left of this Air Farce!
Dalton, I had quite high hopes when you took over from Torpy, and your speach about protecting our maritime and SAR assets gave comfort to me and many others. What a shame that you have now forgotten what you said, like so many other VSOs before you.
How embarrassing it must be for those left in to being compared with Belgium. If it wasn't so sad, it would be funny. But it isn't funny at all, it's pathetic, sad and deeply worrying.
And, just when I thought 'at last, someone close to the top is making a statement' I find it was all in the wrong context. And of course we then get good old CAS steaming in telling us all he doesn't agree with his AOC. What a bunch of clowns we have running what's left of this Air Farce!
Dalton, I had quite high hopes when you took over from Torpy, and your speach about protecting our maritime and SAR assets gave comfort to me and many others. What a shame that you have now forgotten what you said, like so many other VSOs before you.
How embarrassing it must be for those left in to being compared with Belgium. If it wasn't so sad, it would be funny. But it isn't funny at all, it's pathetic, sad and deeply worrying.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An RAF comprising six fast-jet squadrons would be smaller than at any point since its foundation in 1918. It would take British combat air power back to the pre-RAF days of the Royal Flying Corps.
I read once of a similar spat in the RN - a commodore disagreed publicly with his admiral and was fearful of his future.
The admiral told him, "I value your views and I respect your right to differ with me. If we agreed with each other all the time, one of us would be redundant.."
sv
PS. edited to add: AVM Bagwell asserted that
These can't be too demanding then..
The admiral told him, "I value your views and I respect your right to differ with me. If we agreed with each other all the time, one of us would be redundant.."
sv
PS. edited to add: AVM Bagwell asserted that
the RAF would “absolutely meet the current task and operational priorities”.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tennessee - Smoky Mountains
Age: 55
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Bearing in mind the far greater bombing accuracy and weapons effectiveness of any potential adversary in comparison to those fielded at the time of the RLC my surprise was somewhat short-lived.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AOC 1 Gp has been a regular visitor to Cottesmore since last year, when the first wave of cuts to the Harrier was announced. He is the first AOC who actually appears "real", and has been very open and honest in all his briefings. I actually believe what he says, and I believe he believes what he says to us, rather than his predecessors who would say anything to make their masters proud of them.