Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

F-35 Cancelled, then what ?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

F-35 Cancelled, then what ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Dec 2017, 20:39
  #10921 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: South Skerry
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of what value is your getting shirty with brat about the myriad stumbles the program has had?

In hope that the upcoming stumble will be handled better if we take "denial" out of the list of management options.
George K Lee is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2017, 10:01
  #10922 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Lon UK
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In a perfect world!??
Brat is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2017, 10:34
  #10923 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Lon UK
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the meantime some these ‘stumbling’ disasters of a plane have recently concluded taking part in Vigilant Ace where they will have had the opportunity to test sensors against North Korean forces and validate the accuracy of their threat data library against the real thing in operational conditions. 18 F-35 stealth fighter jets were deployed during the exercise along with 6 F-22’s which has now finished.
https://www.realcleardefense.com/art...te_112724.html
Brat is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2017, 18:05
  #10924 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Brat
In the meantime some these ‘stumbling’ disasters of a plane have recently concluded taking part in Vigilant Ace where they will have had the opportunity to test sensors against North Korean forces and validate the accuracy of their threat data library against the real thing in operational conditions. 18 F-35 stealth fighter jets were deployed during the exercise along with 6 F-22’s which has now finished.
https://www.realcleardefense.com/art...te_112724.html
Doubtless the NK radar operators and their friends are doing exactly the same thing....

History tells us that Sparta was defeated after a long series of indecisive engagements allowed its enemies to identify and target the weak points of its military. The protracted 'war on terror' and exercises such as the above offer similar learning opportunities.
etudiant is online now  
Old 17th Dec 2017, 19:29
  #10925 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Lon UK
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The alternative being?
Brat is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2017, 00:29
  #10926 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,352
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Brat
The alternative being?
Well, diplomacy does have its uses.
For instance, the US could mention to China and Russia that it is prepared to discuss the sale of nuclear weapons to South Korea and Taiwan unless North Korea is also denuclearized.
My guess is that this might attract more productive discussions than the expensive bluster has to date.
etudiant is online now  
Old 18th Dec 2017, 07:35
  #10927 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,438
Received 1,597 Likes on 733 Posts
Fantastic idea. You are aware of the NPT?
ORAC is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2017, 09:49
  #10928 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,283
Received 38 Likes on 29 Posts
OK now the Israeli Air Force has declared their LM F-35A's operational where are the naysayers?

IDFAF is one of the most combat ready air forces in the World and they're happy...
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2017, 10:03
  #10929 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 2,164
Received 47 Likes on 23 Posts
If somebody else pays the bills then every F-35 customer would be happy. Sadly only Israel is in this fortunate position.
Just This Once... is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2017, 11:05
  #10930 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: South Skerry
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JTO is correct.

Israel has cut a unique deal in other ways, particularly in terms of its future ability to match the jet's characteristics to its specific requirements. That is important, not nit-picking.

And they got a gift-wrapped industrial participation package, of the kind that everyone swore blind would never be handed to anyone, into the bargain.

Last edited by George K Lee; 18th Dec 2017 at 11:29.
George K Lee is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2017, 11:38
  #10931 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,283
Received 38 Likes on 29 Posts
The real issue is that the aircraft appears to work.

How it is paid for etc etc is a smokescreen. The US uses Israel as a a test and verification piece while maintaining a balance and bastion in the ME.
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2017, 11:52
  #10932 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Lon UK
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Israel certainly has a reputation of honing it’s weapon systems to a fine edge, and of being able to use them to their full potential.
Brat is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2017, 13:03
  #10933 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brat
In the meantime some these ‘stumbling’ disasters of a plane have recently concluded taking part in Vigilant Ace where they will have had the opportunity to test sensors against North Korean forces and validate the accuracy of their threat data library against the real thing in operational conditions. 18 F-35 stealth fighter jets were deployed during the exercise along with 6 F-22’s which has now finished.
https://www.realcleardefense.com/art...te_112724.html
Give it a rest, everyone knowns that those aircraft are not combat ready, all they are doing is burning gas and boring holes in clouds...
glad rag is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2017, 13:14
  #10934 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,228
Received 415 Likes on 258 Posts
Originally Posted by etudiant
Well, diplomacy does have its uses.
My guess is that this might attract more productive discussions than the expensive bluster has to date.
Given that the last 40 years of varying approaches have achieved the square root of bloody fork all, this current approach is no better and no worse than previous. Negotiations don't happen in a vacuum. Your suggestions on this simple solution to a somewhat complex problem, have you forwarded it to Foggy Bottom yet? OK, we are heading off topic, so I'll stop there.
I agree with JTO on the virtues of using 'other peoples' money.' As an American tax payer, I am not happy that our special relationship with the UK is somehow being overwritten by this "extra special" relationship with Israel.


Originally Posted by glad rag
everyone knowns that those aircraft are not combat ready,
No, everyone does not know that. You appear to be making stuff up. (As to "how many systems are cleared and how many are not" that's another matter and we can thank our friends in the world of software program management for how that's going.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2017, 15:13
  #10935 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: South Skerry
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The US uses Israel as a a test and verification piece[sic]

That may not be correct, since the Israelis appear to be headed towards customizing their F-35s. Media reports refer to an in-country test aircraft being delivered next year. If they follow the pattern with the F-16 (where they also had their own testbed jet) it's quite possible that the IDF jets will diverge from the standard upgrade track.

The real issue is that the aircraft appears to work.

To be more specific, it appears to meet Israeli criteria for IOC (or equivalent) and neither you nor I know what those criteria are.
George K Lee is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2017, 16:28
  #10936 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brat
In the meantime some these ‘stumbling’ disasters of a plane have recently concluded taking part in Vigilant Ace where they will have had the opportunity to test sensors against North Korean forces and validate the accuracy of their threat data library against the real thing in operational conditions. 18 F-35 stealth fighter jets were deployed during the exercise along with 6 F-22’s which has now finished.
https://www.realcleardefense.com/art...te_112724.html
Come on! Those aircraft were all flown by Lockheed shills.
KenV is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2017, 16:31
  #10937 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by etudiant
Well, diplomacy does have its uses.
For instance, the US could mention to China and Russia that it is prepared to discuss the sale of nuclear weapons to South Korea and Taiwan unless North Korea is also denuclearized.
My guess is that this might attract more productive discussions than the expensive bluster has to date.
Really? That could only be done if the US were to unilaterally abrogate the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, an extremely unlikely event. So China and Russia would almost certainly call that bluff.
KenV is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2017, 16:35
  #10938 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by George K Lee
To be more specific, it appears to meet Israeli criteria for IOC (or equivalent) and neither you nor I know what those criteria are.
Indeed we do not. But we can be confident that Israel's criteria were not created by the LM shills who supposedly created USMC's and USAF's criteria.
KenV is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2017, 17:25
  #10939 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,228
Received 415 Likes on 258 Posts
George, I believe I mentioned a few pages back that the IAF risk assessment and risk thresholds are likely to be different than other nations' programs and processes, and that they are incentivized to exercise the aircraft and arrive at their own change/mod proposals that are tailored to their requirements.

Put another way, they may have been willing to take on far more risk than the other users/stake holders.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2017, 23:03
  #10940 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Lon UK
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The fact is that despite the problems that have occurred, the mistakes made, and indeed the money spent, the project and system has gone ahead, and seems to be a path that has led the way into the future of air combat.

A path that appears to be being followed by the Russians and Chinese.

Brat is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.