Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

F-35 Cancelled, then what ?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

F-35 Cancelled, then what ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Feb 2016, 14:19
  #8681 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Likewise with the F-35. I don't really like its looks, but I suspect it will work out in the end.
If you think the F-35 is ugly, Boeing's JSF (which would have been the F-32) makes the F-35 look a thing of elegantly graceful beauty. Did Boeing really think USAF would ever select their ugly monstrosity? Clearly they did.
KenV is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2016, 15:55
  #8682 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,430
Received 1,594 Likes on 731 Posts
looks aren't everything......

ORAC is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2016, 16:04
  #8683 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Washington.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,077
Received 151 Likes on 53 Posts
re: looks aren't everything......

Well, that's what I told my wife. She said they are everything, if that's all you've got.
GlobalNav is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2016, 16:05
  #8684 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
looks aren't everything......
And neither is agility. At least not anymore. In today's complex air warfare environment agility is but one factor in countless factors that determine the effectiveness of a weapon system.
KenV is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2016, 17:38
  #8685 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Define agility Ken.
glad rag is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2016, 18:37
  #8686 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
I'm guessing agile in the sense of energy manoeuvrability. In my book that includes turn rate/radius/g, climb, accel. All good for missile energy at launch and missile defence. Did I mention that before? Sorry.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2016, 19:37
  #8687 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Define agility Ken.
As CM said, basically energy manueverability. For some, agility/EM has dropped so low on the list of priorities in air warfare that missileer concepts are re-emerging. Where missileer is defined as an airborne missile platform with very limited agility/EM and optimized for the sensor suite and the number and range of missiles it can carry. I'm not at all a proponent of such and consider them point designs of little utility/effectiveness in the real world.
KenV is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2016, 19:48
  #8688 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Wasn't there a time when some bright spark announced that every battle could be won with missiles? They even started building aircraft without guns as a result.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2016, 20:15
  #8689 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wasn't there a time when some bright spark announced that every battle could be won with missiles? They even started building aircraft without guns as a result.
Indeed. Fortunately, at least the Phantom had many other attributes that made it an excellent all round fighter. Even then, the gun was added later. Interestingly, I'm given to understand that RAF Typhoons have no gun? Is that true?
KenV is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2016, 20:45
  #8690 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
No, they have a 27mm Mauser. The Typhoon gun story is a long and shocking one. Probably too much thread drift to go into whole thing here, so précis.

Designed with gun. Announcement to remove it save money (really? How much does a gun cost?). Expense of removal = huge. Leave gun in to preserve c of g but no ammo or support equipment. 2006, "ooh, a gun is a good idea for CAS and such, buy ammo."

Other stories of mounting a gun in a plastic aeroplane, but it's working.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2016, 21:37
  #8691 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
I hope the criticisms can stay with the movers and shakers who have allowed things to get where they are. I hope the criticisms can stay away from those operating it. One only has to look at how pilots who praise it are berated on this forum, and others, to realise that some people just wanna vent their disgust at anyone who will listen.

The Atlantic trail is a clear example.


MSOCS - You have me puzzled. I just re-read the Atlantic-trail comments here and while there was some critique, nobody was being "berated" as far as I can see. Do you have specifics?
LowObservable is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2016, 22:18
  #8692 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Maybe just leave the Atlantic Trail as it is. It's not big news, it worked, it's not the first time it's been done. I think MSOCS point is don't shoot the guys flying the trail.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 19th Feb 2016, 23:14
  #8693 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
My point is more the one-sided attitude-policing we've seen lately on this thread, where F-35 critics are portrayed as abusive bullies and pro-F-35 people are allowed to plant all kinds of misinformation without any consequences.
LowObservable is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2016, 09:04
  #8694 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question for you all, can the F35B operate the AMRAAM from internal carriage ? I don't mean carry, I mean operationally fire and guide the weapon to target which includes any mid course data linkage.

Simple question.
glad rag is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2016, 09:30
  #8695 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
F-35A has done it (iirc), can't see any reason why the B wouldn't be able to?

-RP
Rhino power is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2016, 10:04
  #8696 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sussex
Age: 66
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The USMC has declared IOC with 2b software, that only supports internally carried weapons. One would have hoped that the USMC had proven that the B could launch an AMRAAM....
PhilipG is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2016, 10:46
  #8697 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LowObservable
My point is more the one-sided attitude-policing we've seen lately on this thread, where F-35 critics are portrayed as abusive bullies and pro-F-35 people are allowed to plant all kinds of misinformation without any consequences.
Yes, there is always a problem with these totally outnumbered bullies....
Tourist is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2016, 10:53
  #8698 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
The B model did a double firing a year or two ago. Not surprisingly, I don't recall seeing anything about the range or any other firing parameters, but it seems to have worked.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2016, 11:47
  #8699 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm, all I can find at the moment is 2B gives "initial" A/A capability....


Whatever that is....but it's not "full" A/A capability...congressional report April '5....



Tourist, you mean like these guys?

Operational Testers Flag F-35 Software Issues « Breaking Defense - Defense industry news, analysis and commentary

?

Last edited by glad rag; 20th Feb 2016 at 11:58.
glad rag is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2016, 12:30
  #8700 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: England's green and pleasant land
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
gr,

AFAIK, AIM-120 has been successfully deployed from both stations inside the Weapon Bay, with read across to the other bay, thereby qualifying the carriage, jettison and release of AMRAAM. Missiles have been fully supported throughout the set engagement envelope.

CM, I don't believe the trial specifics are in the public domain, therefore range, aspect, is still close-hold.

Firings were very successful, as one would expect, given the time/money/sweat/effort available.
MSOCS is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.