Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Should the RAF be scrapped? (merged)

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Should the RAF be scrapped? (merged)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Aug 2010, 15:31
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Middle England
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The argument that 'the Army could do that' works both ways. The Air Force could do the army stuff with the bods and equipment, similarly the Navy could too. Gifting the Air Force folks and equipment to the Army, does't mean they can do it...
Jumping_Jack is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2010, 15:37
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seek the 'Two Johns' on youtube for the discussion re. having how many Admirals related to how many major ships; I'm actually pro-Navy ( particularly FAA ) but it is a good point, with humour.

Last edited by Double Zero; 9th Aug 2010 at 15:55.
Double Zero is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2010, 15:42
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Glesga, Scotland
Age: 51
Posts: 230
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not to state the obvious BUT, assuming they decided to give the navy the option of providing UK defence from there flat tops as was mentioned on the radio.
Only the harrier out off the airforce currant aircraft can used on carriers !
So are we to up the order for F-35's??
Buy F18's as mentioned on the other thread (or buy French !!!!)

What am saying is NONE off these options are cheap so they are not going to save any cash .
And is going to cost more !
fallmonk is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2010, 15:50
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 1,371
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they canned the RAF and transferred all the equipment to the Army/RN how many personnel do you think would go with it? If individuals had wanted to 'dig in' they would have joined the Army and if they had wanted to 'give up' they would have joined the Navy.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.... and before anyone else says it, if they had wanted to wear RAC patrolmans uniform, nylon trousers, clothes from George at Asda and white socks then they would have joined the Air Force. Which they did!
Wrathmonk is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2010, 16:28
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,081
Received 2,942 Likes on 1,253 Posts


Ok, so that's sorted then, you Air Commodores will all transfer over to the Army in the rank of Colonel, you Sergeants will all become RSM's what ever they are and I am sorry, but there does not appear to be a position for a Royal on their manning strength, I would suggest you go along with the man in the funny hat Sir and see if the Navy can find an opening for you.....

Senior RAF and army officers (and King George VI?) planning the next mission? | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

Last edited by NutLoose; 9th Aug 2010 at 20:26.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2010, 17:10
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I used to enjoy reading the debates on here, but instead it just descends into someone banging on about how great the Navy is. The debate here is that while some try to come up with an affordable, cost-effective solution to the provision of Defence capability, the narrow-minded brigade just see it as an opportunity to bash the RAF. People love to rush forward and tell their stories of how an organisation screwed up, or to highlight some nobs within it. I spent some of my time today trying to reach a solution with one of my Army bretheren who refused to see that his interpretation of a situation may be wrong and instead spent his time knocking my service. Great. Jointery is inhibited by the closed minds who can't move forward and instead spend their time calling names and making fun of things they don't understand.

Bernard Law Montgomery, also know as 1st Viscount Montgomery of Alamein once said:

"Air power is indivisible. If you split it up into compartments, you merely pull it to pieces and destroy its greatest asset, its flexibility. "
Compressorstall is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2010, 17:17
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,082
Received 188 Likes on 72 Posts
Bernard Law Montgomery, also know as 1st Viscount Montgomery of Alamein once said:

"Air power is indivisible. If you split it up into compartments, you merely pull it to pieces and destroy its greatest asset, its flexibility. "
What would he know? He never spent his life making comments and dispensing opinions on Pprune from the comfort of his armchair....
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2010, 17:32
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Army Must Go!

An island nation needs a Navy and an Airforce to defend the homeland. It needs an Army to occupy lands that belong to others. It's about time we stopped pretending we are a major player.
changeitnot is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2010, 18:35
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'The Air Force could do the army stuff with the bods and equipment, similarly the Navy could too.'

Given the state of many an airman and officer that I have seen recently I very much doubt that. At the same time, the IQ of the average infantry soldier would exclude them from piloting a fast jet.

They are different jobs for different people.

The funniest point I heard on the JV show was from a lady that said her son was a RAF Chef...and soldier first.

I don't think so...

Anyway, roll on the end of Oct.


Last edited by gijoe; 9th Aug 2010 at 21:09.
gijoe is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2010, 20:08
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: One Three Seven, Disco Heaven.
Age: 65
Posts: 2,546
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 18 Posts
Code:
was a RAF Chef...and solider first
Don't know what goes on in the RAF/Navy/Army nowadays, but back in the 70/80s, although we in the Airforce all had trades that were effectively our day jobs, we were also a source of manpower with a rifle. Try getting the civvy painters or the JPA terminal, to man a checkpoint or sanger.
Dan Gerous is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2010, 20:15
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An RAF Chef would never have been live armed, you had to have successfully completed your trade training before that could happen.

As the RAF Catering course is obviously the hardest course ever invented, must be as no one has ever passed it, cant see how an RAF Chef would ever be trusted with a rifle.
Seldomfitforpurpose is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2010, 20:25
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,081
Received 2,942 Likes on 1,253 Posts
An RAF Chef would never have been live armed, you had to have successfully completed your trade training before that could happen.

As the RAF Catering course is obviously the hardest course ever invented, must be as no one has ever passed it, cant see how an RAF Chef would ever be trusted with a rifle.
Actually Chef is a misnomer, if you look at their actual job title, they are

"Fitters and Turners"

They take perfectly good food, fit it into cooking containers and turn it into sh*t..
NutLoose is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2010, 20:31
  #33 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
Actually Chef is a misnomer, if you look at their actual job title, they are

"Fitters and Turners"

They take perfectly good food, fit it into cooking containers and turn it into sh*t..
And potentially able to kill more people without any ammunition

Garn, must be time for some PTI bashing, leave the food bashers alone
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2010, 20:42
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by minigundiplomat


What would he know? He never spent his life making comments and dispensing opinions on Pprune from the comfort of his armchair....
Indeed. Perhaps such 'experts' could form a new unit with new badges something like these?


TheWizard is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2010, 21:13
  #35 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Where can I get one of those for my Desking Suit?
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2010, 21:17
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dan Gerous make a good point about being an armed guarding force during the 70/80s...but that is not being a soldier. They are very different things.

Being an infantry soldier today is a very complex game that involves some sophisticated bits of kit - it is not a case of pick up gun, run towards hill shooting and shouting - and this reinforces my point some posts ago about the RAF not being able to do the Army's job and vice versa. The average burden of 70kg is another issue.

You may ask how does the average Joe do this given his lack of schooling? By doing it again and again, and again, and relying on his mates, and this is his main job - not a part time activity inbetween engine changes, photography details, cooking lunch for the station or counting aircrew gloves in the stores. There are many parts of the Army that kid themselves that they could do the infantry job but this is far from the reality.

I look forward to Oct again

G
gijoe is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2010, 22:14
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,298
Received 41 Likes on 32 Posts
I've got a good idea. Cancel the RAF and create something called the Royal Flying Corps as part of the Army. Those who like fishing boats could re=form the RNAS!
TBM-Legend is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2010, 22:19
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vine wine whine shwein

I don't know about the RAF - but can we scrap the malodorous Jeremy please? A more pointless and incipid broadcaster you'd be hard pressed to find.
Al R is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2010, 22:23
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: GMT
Age: 53
Posts: 2,082
Received 188 Likes on 72 Posts
Good use of the word 'incipid'. I prefer le deguster d' coque [apologies to all french speaking forum members for murdering your language].
minigundiplomat is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2010, 22:24
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
leave the food bashers alone
I had Beef Wellington in London recently, and it wasn't a patch on the 1996 MCSU dish that I still remember with salivating chops.
Al R is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.