Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Oman Typhoon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Apr 2010, 19:32
  #21 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,406
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 4 Posts
Sticking to the subject in hand. We gave up the Jags, we gave up the Shars (which you supported) all of which felt painful at the time but the reality is we haven't been invaded We are buying 160 of the things. In business the term it's called cascading. You flog the old stuff while someone still wants to buy it at a decent price, then buy something new. if that's deranged in your book then I can live with that because that's what happens in the real world. What else would you offer up when the axe man comes?
Navaleye is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2010, 20:08
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Just behind the back of beyond....
Posts: 4,187
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
You really should go and pollute some Naval forum, chum, because when it comes to air power, you're clueless.

Typhoon is not 'old kit', nor is it irrelevant. It's one of the last things to get rid of.
Jackonicko is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2010, 21:07
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: somewhere...everywhere
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What else would you offer up when the axe man comes?
Interesting question.

What's the answer?

Flying Serpent is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2010, 21:26
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Just behind the back of beyond....
Posts: 4,187
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
If you mean within defence, then CVF and JSF for a start.

And the planned Trident replacement, taking a cheaper (admittedly less capable) deterrent in its place.
Jackonicko is offline  
Old 3rd Apr 2010, 21:55
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North Pole
Posts: 970
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Is the Typhoon any good at ultra low level? If the answer is no, then the Omani's don't need it!

Is it reliable in hot and high runway operations? If the answer is no, then the Omani's don't need it!

Can it operate off desert strips or highways? If the answer is no then the Omani's don't need it!

I could go on but the answer is the same!

newt is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2010, 06:19
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's a question, and it's reference the whole swing role debate....

Would it be fair to say that a heater and a gun doesn't make you an AD player anymore? Can the same now be said of an LGB that has no GPS help in the A-mud role? What, then, is swing role?

My own opinion is that to be classed as swing role in today's environment (the warfighting one, not the 'I love/ hate aeroplane X unconditionally' one)you need a fox three (well...four or so..), an advanced pod and a GPS guided weapon. Very soon this will need to be augmented by either an LO platform or a SEAD/DEAD weapon as well. No point swinging between roles with gay abandon if all the SAMs in christendom and beyond can reach out and grab you.

I am minded, for the ability to swing into the COIN role that one needs the gun as well.

I realise that the Typhoon must be a swing role aeroplane (I disagree) because the RAF news says it is...the same font of knowledge that shows Seeb, Bastion and KAF as Typhoon shapes in roundel colours...(Off topic but that annoys the hell out of me, and I can't think it overwhelms our heroic SH and hard working AT fleets either)

Anyway, what say you?
orca is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2010, 22:11
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You're f***ing deranged, chum.
So is the guv'm'nt
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2010, 22:22
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jackonico - On the basis that some Harrier airframes are sub 3000 fhrs and there are is now a squadron less flogging hours off them why do you believe that they cannot continue flying for the next 8-10 years in the form of the reduced force they have ?
RileyDove is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2010, 22:35
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,794
Received 82 Likes on 38 Posts
orca,

My own opinion is that to be classed as swing role in today's environment (the warfighting one, not the 'I love/ hate aeroplane X unconditionally' one)you need a fox three (well...four or so..)
Four x AMRAAM
an advanced pod
Litening III
and a GPS guided weapon.
Six x Enhanced Paveway 2. Picture follows, minus the AAMs...



Typhoon must be a swing role aeroplane (I disagree)
Errmm, you specified your "swing role" shopping list, and Typhoon has all the elements already... so why do you disagree?!

for the ability to swing into the COIN role that one needs the gun as well.
Got that too.

Very soon this will need to be augmented by either an LO platform or a SEAD/DEAD weapon as well
Well, it's got neither of those (yet) but as the bold bit indicates, you don't think they matter at the moment! I'd say your argument was well and truly unpicked there.

Seeb, Bastion and KAF as Typhoon shapes in roundel colours...(Off topic but that annoys the hell out of me, and I can't think it overwhelms our heroic SH and hard working AT fleets either)
Probably annoys the GR4 guys too - but we're both assuming anyone out there can be bothered to read the rag in the first place!
Easy Street is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2010, 06:36
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Midlands
Age: 84
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In all the time I was in Oman the only aircraft that operated off dirt strips and/or paved roads were the Hercs, Skyvans and Defenders. Operating a fast jet from these was not considered necessary, at that time, and I don't think it would be now.
A2QFI is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2010, 07:16
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North Pole
Posts: 970
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
A2QFI, In my time in Oman we had contingency plans to operate Jags off the black top road. Several sections were, I believe, built in a straight line for just that reason. Not saying we ever used them like we did in Germany but it was always considered an option should the main Omani bases be knocked out.
newt is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2010, 08:27
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Midlands
Age: 84
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Newt - I do agree that it would be possible to land on many stretches of the North/South road but what you would do when you got there might be problematical - fuel, weapns, turnround etc. A colleague, the late Neil McGibbon, once landed at Marmul and had a bowser out from Thurait to refuel him. If you think we know each other please PM me.
A2QFI is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.