Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

GR-9 question please chaps

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

GR-9 question please chaps

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Jan 2010, 14:42
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am somewhat reminded in this thread of Sean Connery saying he would never do Bond again! I think that the chances of GR.9 dropping weapons in anger are still very good for the old workhorse. Politically any government is going to find it very hard to scrap carriers that have already been started - I would anticipate that the potential Trident replacement stands a far greater chance of being abandoned.
As an insurance policy for the future the Harrier stands a good chance of surviving -in terms of technology, advancement of it's capabilities hasn't been abandoned and the airframes are capable of easily being advanced beyond 2018 -it's been looked at already.
So in essence I would say that F-35 has little or no future and the likely hood of the new carriers having a compliment of Harriers is very high.
RileyDove is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2010, 22:08
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Where ever the wind takes me
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Ranger, supprisingly it does make a differance what aircraft you have "up there". Its like comparing a ford escort to a BMW, there both cars but both have very differant qualitys!
Is Afghanastan winable? Id say no. We dont have the troops to hold the ground we spend so long trying to cover. Go out day after day, throught he same fields doing the same ****, all the time waiting for the **** to hit the fan!
What do i think, controversial as it is lets just get the hell out of there! This will no doubt anger people but hey...thats MY opinion! Feel free to rip it apart!
laters!
andy148 is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2010, 23:11
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: The Meadows
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr Grim... as much as it pains me, i have to agree with recc_fac on this one it is indeed called a cas brief now!

I think that B words est of the MQ9 dropping all that ordnance is a tad hopeful! I know as of last year it was averaging about one a month....with a hit rate of 100% every two months too much time in down town LV if you ask me!! No offence guys....
I'm not saying what doctrine / training uses (only do ops, don't you know) but I have heard a lot (50-100?) of operational 9-lines in the last year and every single one has been called a 9-line by both JTACs of many nationalities and aircrew from a large range of aircraft. Maybe you are right and everyone in the coalition in Afghanistan is wrong!

Second point - if you are implying that Reaper has a hit rate of 50% and/or that UK FJs employ anywhere near the same amount of weapons as Reaper then you are seriously misinformed (again I am talking about ops, Garvie / HWD don't count).
Mr Grim is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2010, 06:34
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: England
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr Grim,

although you are quite correct that the term 9 liner is used out in theatre, it is infact incorrect. CAS Briefs replaced them a while back and any reference to a 9 line brief should be in connection with MERT!

Most British JTACs are actually using the correct terminology. Call it splitting hairs however, it makes a difference up in C2 when someone shouts, 'A 9 liner has just come in.'
Pure Pursuit is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2010, 14:56
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: England
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a little something for the FAC?

Flying Marines
ZuluMike is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2010, 18:21
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ZM

I am a little concerned that, due to the way it's written, some people might consider that to be a joke.

Regards,

Orca.
orca is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2010, 19:24
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lancashire
Age: 48
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This thread is just a vehicle the OP is using to boast about his/her job, just another pprune acronym chopper IMO.
Thelma Viaduct is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.