Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Lightning Down At FAOB

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Lightning Down At FAOB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Aug 2012, 12:07
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brum
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Updated link to the report...
Nige321 is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2012, 12:36
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: n/a
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well that makes pretty depressing reading.
Daysleeper is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2012, 13:29
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Philippines
Age: 81
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Awfully depressing !
Q-RTF-X is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2012, 17:14
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,578
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Agreed - an accident just waiting to happen, methinks. Any response from the operators?
dead_pan is online now  
Old 24th Aug 2012, 17:27
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I was asked to fly a Jet Provost newly imported into the US, and flew a few qualification flights in it. When it became clear that the owner was not going to follow the full Service maintenance schedule, I walked away. Glad I did.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2012, 18:00
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,937
Received 2,851 Likes on 1,219 Posts
That is a pretty damning report, no wonder they closed their doors soon after, the poor guy had all the cards stacked against him
I am suprised that no one appears to have ended up in court.


.

Last edited by NutLoose; 24th Aug 2012 at 18:02.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2012, 18:06
  #67 (permalink)  
More bang for your buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: land of the clanger
Age: 82
Posts: 3,512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No wonder they decided to close the company down, they couldn't possibly have carried on with that record even if they were allowed to which I doubt.

As Daysleeper said: Well that makes pretty depressing reading.
green granite is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2012, 19:11
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
When one leaves the RAF and climbs into a ex-mil jet, there is (certainly in mine and Thunder City's cases) the option of ignoring a large number of RAF procedures. After pouring over the Aircraft maint logs (which I'd never seen in the RAF), one realises that 98% of that annoying nausea is in fact very important.
I made it my business to know the Service record, life expiry and servicing schedule of every major component on my civvy mil jet. I also insisted on knowing the background and quals of every guy working on it.

And when the "delayed till next scheduled maintenance" plus "requested extension on scheduled maintenance" game started, I left.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2012, 19:15
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Cape Town / UK / Europe
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thinking just how close I was to booking a flight with them, this leaves me chilled to the bone.......
Me too. I've just spent an hour reading the report. It also makes me wonder how much my friends and family like me, or much they think my life insurance is worth, as one of the ideas touted for my 50th. was ..... a flight in the Lightning, which if I remember correctly cost about USD 900 at the time.

From Thunder City's website (which has not been updated for a couple of years)
Thunder City

These amazing jets are meticulously maintained by former air force engineers and always flown well within their performance limitations. Even so we do not take safety for granted. Therefore you will be trained to safely use the aircraft’s emergency systems such as the ejection seat, emergency oxygen etc.
Ya well ...no - fine!

Last edited by Tableview; 24th Aug 2012 at 19:20. Reason: Must have been $9000, not 900!
Tableview is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2012, 19:36
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,937
Received 2,851 Likes on 1,219 Posts
I do wonder how the passengers signing a waiver would stand up in court, as they were signed under the belief the aircraft were legal, Servicable and correctly maintained.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2012, 19:38
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sad tale indeed.

One thing that does strike home is the culture that seemingly spread downwards through the company.

I don't see how they could just ignore the quite damming audits. Really who in their right mind would, unless it was all about the [lack of] money?
glad rag is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2012, 19:45
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Cape Town / UK / Europe
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The report states that the passenger should have been issued with a ticket. I suspect that the absence of that, which is a contract outlining legal liabilities and limitations, would, in the event of an accident, have placed the company (and not the pilot, for it is not his responsibility) in a very tenuous situation.

I am somewhat surprised to hear how bad things were at Thunder City as I have been there several times and know someone who was involved in its PR side. I had always held Mike Beachy Head in high regard. No longer. I hope he faces criminal charges.

Quote from guess who ............
Flying this fleet of seasoned fighters is one thing; keeping them going is another. Some of them are nearly 50 years old and just to keep the Lightning in the air for 40 minutes takes about 55 man hours of maintenance and preparation.

'Every little tiny thing, if it is not done right, becomes a weak link in the chain. If you cock up in business, you lose a bit of money and at worst it goes bust. If we cock up, you die,' says Mike.

Last edited by Tableview; 24th Aug 2012 at 19:51.
Tableview is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2012, 20:02
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,738
Received 77 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by NutLoose
the poor guy had all the cards stacked against him
Sadly, that 'poor guy' wasn't exactly blamless either it would seem, and one would certainley have to question some of his decision making, especially given his 'antics' of the previous day/evening, and electing to fly the thing in that state the next day

As for TC's maintainance proceedures
GeeRam is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2012, 20:09
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The report and some of your informed comments in other countries have put paid
to my idea of going for a fly in one of the ex mil jets here in Aust.
500N is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2012, 21:15
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Damning indeed, especially to someone as unmechanical as me. Bl**dy terrifying actually, esp. as I'd promised myself a go at some point, and delighted that one of my friends who did go (and absolutely loved it) was lucky.

Could any of the Brunty LPG guys comment? Are they intending to take on the remaining ex-TC Lightnings?

S41
Squirrel 41 is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2012, 21:45
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But that could never happen over here, could it?

Our main operator of a Complex former military aircraft is constantly reminding us of how their aircraft is operated by former RAF personnel and how safety is always at the forefronts of their mind.

...and surely their failure to adhere to RAF procedures, and then introduce a system of intentionally introducing FOD into the intakes of that aircraft, against all wisdom and practices of 30 years of RAF service, with no safeguards to remove it therefore resulting in the destruction of two priceless Olympus engines was nothing more than a mistake that anyone could have made.....



One day....
Sir Loin is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2012, 21:58
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ouch, Sir Loin, but timely perhaps.

Once bitten........
glad rag is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2012, 22:07
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,937
Received 2,851 Likes on 1,219 Posts
I too thought if you are concerned about engine corrosion issues, especially with steel turbine discs then put the Silica in the Exhaust where it isn't going to go through an engine and have a foolproof system in place to remove it, what suprised me even more bearing in mind they are now down to I believe 1 spare engine and the above corrosion concerns to see it doing low passes over the salt ladened sea near cliffs in a high bird environment..

But to compare the Vulcan operation to that report and the Thunder City operation seems to be miles apart in real life, especially as the Vulcan still has full manufacturers support.

Last edited by NutLoose; 24th Aug 2012 at 22:08.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2012, 22:57
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But to compare the Vulcan operation to that report and the Thunder City operation seems to be miles apart in real life, especially as the Vulcan still has full manufacturers support.
That's the spirit, Nut Loose. I'm sure that the delegates from the South African Aviaition Authority would agree, along with Shell, and the other high profile sponsors who trusted Thunder City to operate in accordance with the stated and accepted proceedures.

As it goes, apparently, the were concerned with the corrosion in the HP and LP compressor casings as opposed to the turbines, and therefore, I'm as surprised as you are as to their chosen path to deal with that. They are also down to a supply of NO further certified engines now, there are no spares.

Perhaps in light of this, as harsh as it may seem, it might be a good time to look over the proceedures and practices of all former military aircraft operators.
Sir Loin is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2012, 23:10
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,937
Received 2,851 Likes on 1,219 Posts
In the Uk I would say 99% of all operators of ex warbirds in the Uk are rigorous in their attitude and working practices, I know there have been a few issues, but the CAA seem to work to a higher standard than most... Hence no Lightnings flying here.

The trouble is no matter what the rules, you will always get the good, the bad and the damn right ugly, the problem is recognising the ugly and dealing with it, unfortunately you often find they are very good at throwing up smoke screens.
NutLoose is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.