Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Tonka F3 Interesting Facts

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Tonka F3 Interesting Facts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Aug 2009, 17:31
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Aylesbury
Age: 58
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Another interesting fact - the MOD preferred the F3 to the F15.

Says it all about the MOD."


Yeah, I read about that too, when I did a some research on the programme for FT1... then read afterwards about the Air Staff losing control of their collective pelvic floor muscles when they saw the F16 gambolling around Farnborough on its first tour in Europe in the late 70's... The info I read implied that they tried to wriggle off the hook saying they didnt want the F3 any more, but were tied into the contract so deep that they were stuck with it.

Not that we've seen that kind of thing happen anywhere before, mind you...

I mean, lets face it... Who the hell would have chosen the F3 over the F15?

FWIW, I'd have chosen the F14 over the F3... After all, what was the mission, the raison d'etre at the time?

Dogfighter or BVR interceptor?

At the time, the job was that of long range interceptor. QRA Air policing & picking off the hoardes of Bears & Backfires coming round the cape before they got to missile launch point if the balloon went up.

Arguably the F14, 15 and 16 would have given us both capabilities.

The F3 was barely OK when it was needed... certainly couldnt have mixed it with any number of other fighters had it come to real air combat. Those who know will know about reliability, particularly that bloody radar...

Thats what happens when you let the Air Staff get an attack of shiny kit syndrome...
Jabba_TG12 is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2009, 17:59
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lowlevel UK
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On May 22nd 2008, one F3 Tornado wizzed through Windsor

One Steve Davis style factoid is: if you turn it around, the F3 Tornado can manage 158 to 206 mph.

It is a wind speed scale from F0 to F6, according to a clever Japanese - Theo Fujita. At F3, this severe wind will tear off roofs and walls, overturn trains, uproot trees and toss cars into the air.
Data-Lynx is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2009, 18:05
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Spain
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Tarnished, see what you've started now?
maxburner is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2009, 18:29
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lowlevel UK
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1435 Flight

Not even mildly chastened, but more in spirit with the original question, how about: the Tornado F3 is the only variable geometry fighter to serve in the Falkland Islands?
Data-Lynx is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2009, 18:51
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hotel Gypsy
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It does OK as a low level bomber.............

I guess that's because it's a low level bomber with a different paint job and some extra space to store the sandwiches
Cows getting bigger is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2009, 20:02
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Somerset
Age: 68
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The F3 has destroyed less enemy ac than the GR
Riskman is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2009, 20:15
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: england
Age: 61
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sitting here gazing into my "model aircraft (NOT toy!!) display case", can i add, F3 better looking!!!

both aircraft depicted "full load" and "dirty"








LOOK, my son bought them as christmas prezzies----don't judge me
mr fish is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2009, 20:37
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Anglia
Posts: 2,076
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Wow! All these huge speeds being banded about - and I thought F3's were restricted by PSI or Amps produced?
Rigga is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2009, 20:56
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 43
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One fact that pertains to both aircraft is that neither will ever shoot down an enemy fighter.

and one more for good luck....

The F3 did not have the same amount of PR as the Phoon. I mean how many random RAF associations have the phoon as its mascot? Force developement anyone?
backTOfront is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2009, 21:03
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: troon
Age: 61
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It hasn't shot down as many Aircraft as Sea Harrier
althenick is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2009, 21:06
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lowlevel UK
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4 the 1 who nose. Three grumpy comments then blessed silence from 11 Mar 08 until today. Such insight; was it a compare and contrast statement for both aircraft or just the F3? You are perhaps:
A specialist is one who knows more and more about less and less?
More to the point, the F3 has certainly intercepted a wider variety of Falklands AT and airbridge 'targets'. As self-loading luggage, I was always pleased to see them.
Data-Lynx is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2009, 21:06
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Several miles SSW of Watford Gap
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The F3 has destroyed less enemy ac than the GR
That statement is incorrect.











It should read that the F3 has destroyed fewer enemy ac than the GR
Climebear is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2009, 21:14
  #33 (permalink)  
Cool Mod
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: 18nm N of LGW
Posts: 6,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am pretty sure that Tarnished did not expect that one or two of you would have a handbags at dawn problem with the subject.

On topic please or it goes!
PPRuNe Pop is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2009, 22:01
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: A galaxy far far away
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK OK! I've got one.



er ....
















sorry
AdLib is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2009, 22:05
  #35 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
I'm a bit new to this;

can one of them fly as high as civilian airliners?
Navaleye is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2009, 23:18
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Green and pleasant land
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alluded to earlier but not actually stated as a Top Trump fact ..

The standard F3 has a large baggage compartment while the standard Typhoon has none. Although both a/c have ample space to store crew overnight bags and duty free


Ok, being serious if we must ... how about how many Squadrons have been equipped with each airframe? Or how many Stations have/will play host to either?

Or,

Which weighs more, the Blue Circle radar or the Blue Circle cannon?

Or,

Ideal for an aircraft with a projected A2G role, thanks to its canards the Typhoon pilot can see less of the ground below and in front of him than the F3 pilot can. How much less?? [No, I've no idea of the answer either but it might just be the killer Top Trump comparison for which the Typhoon has no answer]

CS
cargosales is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2009, 23:29
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Uranus
Posts: 958
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Just to please PPP - back on thread

You could fit a slab of "Wobbly" in the data-link bay of F3 - before they fitted JTIDS.

You could really p!ss off 1 or 2 star USAF Generals by going "Winchester" on Red Flag on the final day (that was with 2-shot kills!) in a jet they knew was less capable. Nothing better than gunning an F-16 from a low-level zoom climb as they blindly transitted to their tanker - turning the radar off and using the JTIDS picture could often get you in and out unannounced!

You could chase down B1-Bs at LL and get a 830kts gun solution!

You could turn up to work 2 hours after the mud-mover affil did and spoil their plan!

You could blow over a Winnebago at low-level in the Nevada desert.

You could launch an early Skyflash and then catch it up!

You could fly an aircraft with stupidest looking fin that is second only to the C17...

The B Word
The B Word is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2009, 01:19
  #38 (permalink)  
10W

PPRuNe Bashaholic
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: The Peoples Alcoholic Republic of Jockistan
Posts: 1,442
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

The B word
Buccaneer ?
10W is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2009, 12:22
  #39 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 437
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
Much as I suspected, I thank you for your efforts. My mate is delighted.

Please feel free to close this thread if I can't find a way to do it myself.
Tarnished is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.