R.I.P Skyhawks
Thanks Elche
The photos show the rapid deterioration of the latex covering on the RNZAF Skyhawks. It has deteriorated to the point where it is holding moisture in.
When is old Helen going to realise that they are not going to be sold as operational airframes, especially in this condition.
It is about time they were sold off to museums and as warbirds, before its too late.
The photos show the rapid deterioration of the latex covering on the RNZAF Skyhawks. It has deteriorated to the point where it is holding moisture in.
When is old Helen going to realise that they are not going to be sold as operational airframes, especially in this condition.
It is about time they were sold off to museums and as warbirds, before its too late.
3 News > Political > Story > Skyhawks sale gets a step closer
'Skyhawks sale gets a step closer
The Air Force's white elephants, the A4 Skyhawks, are one step closer to finally being sold, seven years after they were grounded.
Defence Minister Phil Goff has confirmed to 3 News the US government has given him an assurance to fast track a possible sale, which could come in the next two months.
Since being grounded in 2001 the A4 Skyhawks have proved to be more a nightmare for the Air Force than the pride they once were, costing $300,000 a month to maintain.
The Government has tried to sell them for nine years, only to be blocked every time by the US State Department. But Defence Minister Phil Goff says they are now wanting to help.
“I have now had an assurance from the Department of Defence and the Department of State that once the tender has been issued, to one of the two bidders for our planes, they will fast track the process,” says Goff.
Goff has confirmed to 3 News the sale price is US$110 million dollars for the 17 Skyhawk jets and a fleet of training Aermacchis.
A contract has yet to be awarded by the US, but Goff is confident that should be in the next two months, and a cheque written finally by the end of the year.
“I'll only breathe a sigh of relief when I receive the cheque but so far the assurance given to me by the American government is very welcome,” says Goff.
The assurance came from a high level US official who visited Wellington last week, and it comes less than a month after the visit of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.
The Skyhawks have been sitting outside at the Woodbourne Airbase for almost a year, covered by a hundred thousand dollar latex coating that ACT MP Heather Roy says is failing.
“Water is seeping in between the layers of the latex. It's pooling the so called maintenance is somebody going around after rain with a pin or sharp object piercing the latex covering so that the water drains out and that’s it,” Roy says.
Safe Air, the company that maintains the Skyhawks, would not comment today. The Air Force though says the weather damage was expected but that the important parts of the aircraft are well kept. The Government says their current condition should not hinder any possible future sale.'
Iraqi Air Force?
TJ
'Skyhawks sale gets a step closer
The Air Force's white elephants, the A4 Skyhawks, are one step closer to finally being sold, seven years after they were grounded.
Defence Minister Phil Goff has confirmed to 3 News the US government has given him an assurance to fast track a possible sale, which could come in the next two months.
Since being grounded in 2001 the A4 Skyhawks have proved to be more a nightmare for the Air Force than the pride they once were, costing $300,000 a month to maintain.
The Government has tried to sell them for nine years, only to be blocked every time by the US State Department. But Defence Minister Phil Goff says they are now wanting to help.
“I have now had an assurance from the Department of Defence and the Department of State that once the tender has been issued, to one of the two bidders for our planes, they will fast track the process,” says Goff.
Goff has confirmed to 3 News the sale price is US$110 million dollars for the 17 Skyhawk jets and a fleet of training Aermacchis.
A contract has yet to be awarded by the US, but Goff is confident that should be in the next two months, and a cheque written finally by the end of the year.
“I'll only breathe a sigh of relief when I receive the cheque but so far the assurance given to me by the American government is very welcome,” says Goff.
The assurance came from a high level US official who visited Wellington last week, and it comes less than a month after the visit of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.
The Skyhawks have been sitting outside at the Woodbourne Airbase for almost a year, covered by a hundred thousand dollar latex coating that ACT MP Heather Roy says is failing.
“Water is seeping in between the layers of the latex. It's pooling the so called maintenance is somebody going around after rain with a pin or sharp object piercing the latex covering so that the water drains out and that’s it,” Roy says.
Safe Air, the company that maintains the Skyhawks, would not comment today. The Air Force though says the weather damage was expected but that the important parts of the aircraft are well kept. The Government says their current condition should not hinder any possible future sale.'
Iraqi Air Force?
TJ
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That would be ironic... since Kuwait was flying Skyhawks when Iraq invaded in 1991.
Those Skyhawks are now flying for Brazil... which is another possible buyer (Argentine ditto).
Those Skyhawks are now flying for Brazil... which is another possible buyer (Argentine ditto).
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: England
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have had the pleasure of spending a month on holiday in NZ on both Islands with my family. It was, and probably will be, the best holiday we've ever had.
It is a fantastic country with really nice people. Were it not for family considerations, I would be down there like a flash.
I do not wish to cause offence. But..
Guys. A couple of FJ sqns will not guarantee anything, and in a country of 4 million, you cannot go large on defence. Australia is between you and the rest of the world. Maritime and SAR are a more realistic contribution to your part of the world.
Don't get me wrong. I'm a Brit, and realize that militarily, we are incapable of fighting independently on any great scale, though like you, at platoon level, we can dish it out.
Back here in Europe, when Russia says,'Look, we're a really big country stuffed full of oil, wheat and people, and if we decide to invade Georgia, we will'. We have no answer.
Apart from mumbling about human rights and wondering if the US will help.
It is a fantastic country with really nice people. Were it not for family considerations, I would be down there like a flash.
I do not wish to cause offence. But..
Guys. A couple of FJ sqns will not guarantee anything, and in a country of 4 million, you cannot go large on defence. Australia is between you and the rest of the world. Maritime and SAR are a more realistic contribution to your part of the world.
Don't get me wrong. I'm a Brit, and realize that militarily, we are incapable of fighting independently on any great scale, though like you, at platoon level, we can dish it out.
Back here in Europe, when Russia says,'Look, we're a really big country stuffed full of oil, wheat and people, and if we decide to invade Georgia, we will'. We have no answer.
Apart from mumbling about human rights and wondering if the US will help.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Various
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What a couple of FJ squadrons says is that we are a part of this world and will contribute force when we feel it is required.
Kiwi squadrons made their impact felt in several theaters in WWII. They tended to punch higher than their weight and their re-emergence on the international scene would be a positive thing.
Kiwi squadrons made their impact felt in several theaters in WWII. They tended to punch higher than their weight and their re-emergence on the international scene would be a positive thing.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: England
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, but what good are a couple of sqns of fast jets when NZ impact on good relations in the Far East and humanitarian aid are better served by AT and rotary assets.
Don't get me wrong, I would love to see RNZAF with a FJ capability again. But money is tight. Disaster relief and help where it is really needed are better goodwill ambassadors than punching somebody's lights out.
I will probably stand corrected here, but were the NZ A4s ever involved in a 'hot war', and what were the losses?
I've never met an unpopular Kiwi and you guys are always welcome in Blighty. But the cost of running FJ with such a small population doesn't justify the costs. I wish it were not thus, but if you had to crunch the governmental numbers, health care, roads, education, power supply, care of the old, the sick, ex-politicians and all of the rest leave a couple of FJ sqns way down the list of 'must haves'.
I agree with you, but see the economic arguments against.
Don't get me wrong, I would love to see RNZAF with a FJ capability again. But money is tight. Disaster relief and help where it is really needed are better goodwill ambassadors than punching somebody's lights out.
I will probably stand corrected here, but were the NZ A4s ever involved in a 'hot war', and what were the losses?
I've never met an unpopular Kiwi and you guys are always welcome in Blighty. But the cost of running FJ with such a small population doesn't justify the costs. I wish it were not thus, but if you had to crunch the governmental numbers, health care, roads, education, power supply, care of the old, the sick, ex-politicians and all of the rest leave a couple of FJ sqns way down the list of 'must haves'.
I agree with you, but see the economic arguments against.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: East of Java
Age: 64
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'we are a part of this world and will contribute force when we feel it is required'
bolloxs. Clark right to get rid of the kero burning toys - all very impressive roaring about the place, but what was the real value?
And who is seriously going to attack nz? no one's that unimagitative.
NZ has never moved unilaterally militarily, it follows predetermined political and strategic motives
NZ's in iraq, afganistan and other UN sanctioned zones for political expediency regarding trade, rather than any higher motives. why is no one in Darfor?
nz has been in every major dust up from '39 onwards, but have been discarded economically by the brits in the '70's & then the yanks in the '80's, which is one reason why the white elephant A4's are still sitting around (& the macchi 339's).just as well the latest defence procurement is european based
why doesn't the rnzaf fly PAC XL 750's? NZ made, rugged transports - absent from the airforces inventory
helicopters and transports - the program's on track
bolloxs. Clark right to get rid of the kero burning toys - all very impressive roaring about the place, but what was the real value?
And who is seriously going to attack nz? no one's that unimagitative.
NZ has never moved unilaterally militarily, it follows predetermined political and strategic motives
NZ's in iraq, afganistan and other UN sanctioned zones for political expediency regarding trade, rather than any higher motives. why is no one in Darfor?
nz has been in every major dust up from '39 onwards, but have been discarded economically by the brits in the '70's & then the yanks in the '80's, which is one reason why the white elephant A4's are still sitting around (& the macchi 339's).just as well the latest defence procurement is european based
why doesn't the rnzaf fly PAC XL 750's? NZ made, rugged transports - absent from the airforces inventory
helicopters and transports - the program's on track
No Kiwis in Darfur?
flatfootsam said
"NZ's in iraq, afganistan and other UN sanctioned zones for political expediency regarding trade, rather than any higher motives. why is no one in Darfor?"
Apart from these ones?
http://www.nzdf.mil.nz/operations/de...an/default.htm
"NZ's in iraq, afganistan and other UN sanctioned zones for political expediency regarding trade, rather than any higher motives. why is no one in Darfor?"
Apart from these ones?
http://www.nzdf.mil.nz/operations/de...an/default.htm
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Since being grounded in 2001 the A4 Skyhawks have proved to be more a nightmare for the Air Force than the pride they once were, costing $300,000 a month to maintain.
Last edited by wessex19; 7th Sep 2008 at 01:39.
Please don't take this as RW schadenfreude, but there has been much sense talked about the relative value of a small FJ force for a nation such as NZ. A couple of sqns might soothe egos and provide an interesting diversion at airshows but in the real world such a force would be hideously expensive for a nation the size of NZ.
It is not just the purchase and operating costs. The logic of some posters is that NZ FJs could be deployed in support of Coalition ops. The cost of keeping a small fleet of FJs up to Coalition Theatre Entry Standard would be horrific; even the UK struggles to keep a small proportion of its' relatively large FJ inventory at TES standard. Then the logistics cost of supporting such a det would be a large strain, possibly dictating more AT/AAR etc etc. Finally the US would say "Oh great, 6 old F-16s (for example), park them over there behind the rows of F15s, F18s, F22s and (eventually) Typhoons." To contribute SH and troops would receive a much warmer response as NZ has, pound for pound, some of the best troops on the planet.
So, stick to your (door) guns. Do what is right for NZ. Buy MPA to secure your own backyard and, if you want to support GWoT, provide more troops and Helos. The bonus of this is that the troops/helos can also be used at home or abroad in non-combat roles (SAR/Disaster relief) to provide more than just a "woosh" at airshows.
It is not just the purchase and operating costs. The logic of some posters is that NZ FJs could be deployed in support of Coalition ops. The cost of keeping a small fleet of FJs up to Coalition Theatre Entry Standard would be horrific; even the UK struggles to keep a small proportion of its' relatively large FJ inventory at TES standard. Then the logistics cost of supporting such a det would be a large strain, possibly dictating more AT/AAR etc etc. Finally the US would say "Oh great, 6 old F-16s (for example), park them over there behind the rows of F15s, F18s, F22s and (eventually) Typhoons." To contribute SH and troops would receive a much warmer response as NZ has, pound for pound, some of the best troops on the planet.
So, stick to your (door) guns. Do what is right for NZ. Buy MPA to secure your own backyard and, if you want to support GWoT, provide more troops and Helos. The bonus of this is that the troops/helos can also be used at home or abroad in non-combat roles (SAR/Disaster relief) to provide more than just a "woosh" at airshows.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ostrich syndrome
Quote
"NZ's in iraq, afganistan/And who is seriously going to attack nz?"
Even without your countries contributions in those theatres you already are a target for being what you are, a non Muslim Western Democracy.
Flatfootsams
post #135"NZ's in iraq, afganistan/And who is seriously going to attack nz?"
Even without your countries contributions in those theatres you already are a target for being what you are, a non Muslim Western Democracy.
DIRECTOR
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: U.K.
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Talking about the NZ A4 Skyhawks reminds me of a night stop in Christchurch some years ago. Had 2 days to kill and from our central hotel decided to walk to an Air Museum I was told about on a disused airfield where amongst other aircraft was an A4 Skyhawk.
After walking for what seemed like ages I eventually got there along a very busy road full of traffic but it was well worth a visit.There was an interesting veteran to talk to and I managed to get a bus back!!
Well worth a visit if you are in Christchurch.
After walking for what seemed like ages I eventually got there along a very busy road full of traffic but it was well worth a visit.There was an interesting veteran to talk to and I managed to get a bus back!!
Well worth a visit if you are in Christchurch.
gone?
From Australian aviation express
MILITARY
The sale of the RNZAF’s A-4s looks to have been cleared. (Paul Sadler)
* NZ SKYHAWKS FINALLY CLEARED FOR SALE: Radio NZ News has reported that the RNZAF’s 17 retired A-4K Skyhawk fighter bombers - which were mothballed in 2001 - have finally been cleared by the US government for sale to a private US company.
The NZ$155m (A$128m) sale of the aircraft, which also includes 17 Aermacchi MB-339 advanced trainers, had been held up by the US State Department as well as the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms which reportedly had to approve the transfer of the ejection seat initiation explosives.
The company buying the aircraft, believed to be an Arizona based company which provides air training services to the US military and allies, will send engineering staff to NZ to assess to the aircraft before a final deal is reached.
MILITARY
The sale of the RNZAF’s A-4s looks to have been cleared. (Paul Sadler)
* NZ SKYHAWKS FINALLY CLEARED FOR SALE: Radio NZ News has reported that the RNZAF’s 17 retired A-4K Skyhawk fighter bombers - which were mothballed in 2001 - have finally been cleared by the US government for sale to a private US company.
The NZ$155m (A$128m) sale of the aircraft, which also includes 17 Aermacchi MB-339 advanced trainers, had been held up by the US State Department as well as the US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms which reportedly had to approve the transfer of the ejection seat initiation explosives.
The company buying the aircraft, believed to be an Arizona based company which provides air training services to the US military and allies, will send engineering staff to NZ to assess to the aircraft before a final deal is reached.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aylesbury
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Please excuse my ignorance as I genuinely dont know, but could someone explain the reasons behind why we need the permission of the US to agree the sale of these aircraft between NZ and another nation? Thanks
A sad thread
While on detachment with 50sqn to RNZAF Ohakea in February 1973, I was lucky enough to get a ride in the 74(?)sqn T-bird. Fg. Off. Rod Murdoch opted for low-level route Gold - memorably and spectacularly through the Alps of South Island and culminating in an attack on Queenstown, after which he stood it on its a$se and we climbed out. I don't remember many better days' flying. RIP A4.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another example was the C130. The package we got was a self-maintain package whereas the package sold to the Iranian Air Force had a Lockheed support package included. Where a prop seal needed replacement RAF Engineers could do this in the field. For the Iranian aircraft it involved an engine change and shipment back to the US - at a cost!
The RAF Eng in Tehran who showed the Iranians how to do a seal change got a rocket from Lockheed who stood to lose a nice little earner.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Zealand
Age: 77
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A couple of years have gone by...........
I live in Ashburton now and being now retired of course I have joined the local aviation museum where the hot buzz is that donors have been found to cover the cost of acquiring a Skyhawk.
I live in Ashburton now and being now retired of course I have joined the local aviation museum where the hot buzz is that donors have been found to cover the cost of acquiring a Skyhawk.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's the 21st Century
Uncle Helen was absolutely right to get rid of the A4. Whilst it's great to wax lyrical about 'the time when' and having an orgasm (poor old Kiwi Chick!) from seeing one, the need for the A4 was long past in 1999 if not before. NZ is a very small player in the world and use the dets to be noticed; not influence, but be noticed. The days of Wigwam and Hobnobville are long past - it's an ugly place here in the 21st century but feel free to join us!
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Under the Radar
Age: 64
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dear John, 
As an ex NZ A4 driver, and after reading your negativity dating back to posts in 2007, now that you have joined the Ashburton Aviation Museum fraternity, (and congrats for securing an A4), I trust you will now put your efforts into displaying it with the austerity the aircraft deserves and with the appropriate dignity to those that served on 75 Sqn and also to those sqn pilots who gave their lives in service of their country, even if it was in peacetime!!
I look forward to visiting the museum one day as I've heard it has some great exhibits..
nzav.
As an ex NZ A4 driver, and after reading your negativity dating back to posts in 2007, now that you have joined the Ashburton Aviation Museum fraternity, (and congrats for securing an A4), I trust you will now put your efforts into displaying it with the austerity the aircraft deserves and with the appropriate dignity to those that served on 75 Sqn and also to those sqn pilots who gave their lives in service of their country, even if it was in peacetime!!
I look forward to visiting the museum one day as I've heard it has some great exhibits..
nzav.