Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Anyone for a Lightning?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Anyone for a Lightning?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th June 2007 | 09:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 814
Likes: 429
From: Portsmouth
Anyone for a Lightning?

Hardly used, sold as seen.....

http://www.edisposals.com/is-bin/INT...mpTo=OfferList
Not_a_boffin is online now  
Reply
Old 29th June 2007 | 09:33
  #2 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,490
Likes: 2
From: Between the woods and the water
Or for an estimated £17,500 you could have this

airborne_artist is offline  
Reply
Old 29th June 2007 | 11:39
  #3 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 481
Likes: 0
From: Portsmouth
Does anyone know the reason why the CAA won't approve a Lightning for flight?
c-bert is offline  
Reply
Old 29th June 2007 | 11:46
  #4 (permalink)  
AR1
15 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 740
Likes: 58
From: Nottinghamshire
Does anyone know the reason why the CAA won't approve a Lightning for flight?
Probably because even when they were being looked after, 1 in 3 fell out of the sky!
I saw the stats somewhere, and they make truly 'Frightening' reading, maybe thats how it aquired the nickname?
AR1 is offline  
Reply
Old 29th June 2007 | 11:47
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
From: The front end and about 50ft up
Complexity and kinetic energy are amongst the reasons they've dragged out in the past. However, if the Seffrikans can do it, I'm sure we could.
Fg Off Max Stout is offline  
Reply
Old 29th June 2007 | 12:21
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 814
Likes: 429
From: Portsmouth
And if HHA get their Bucc (XX885) airworthy under complex cat registration then there's a precedent. Anybody any idea what teh current status of that Bucc is?
Not_a_boffin is online now  
Reply
Old 29th June 2007 | 12:44
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 816
Likes: 0
From: Devon, England
or £12,500 for a Jaguar on Ebay.... plenty more according to the seller
Razor61 is offline  
Reply
Old 29th June 2007 | 13:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Bournemouth
Does anyone know the reason why the CAA won't approve a Lightning for flight?

It's because it is a requirement by the CAA that such ventures require the support of the manufacturer, and BAe are, perhaps understandably, unwilling to offer support. No such inhibition in Sith Ifrikaa.

Having said that, the team at Bruntingthorpe have done a magnificent job of keeping their two in airworthy condition. I was speaking to a friend of mine (Air Commodore ret'd) the other year and he said that during a high speed taxi run, in reheat no less, he was very tempted......

Probably because even when they were being looked after, 1 in 3 fell out of the sky!

Garbage, if you'll forgive me.

JP (and LP)
Jaguar Pilot is offline  
Reply
Old 29th June 2007 | 13:57
  #9 (permalink)  
AR1
15 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 740
Likes: 58
From: Nottinghamshire
You're forgiven.

I'm still fairly certain the loss rate was >30% over its life.
AR1 is offline  
Reply
Old 29th June 2007 | 14:06
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Dorset
Flying Lightnings.

Details are a bit hazy, but I recall a modification carried out on the Lightnings in the early 70s to the hydraulics, the AGS1186 bonded seals fitted to the hydraulic components ajacent to the jet pipes were leaking due to the heat, this caused a fine spray of hydraulic oil on to the jet pipe and caused a fire in the aft fuselage, and certainly a few were lost by this problem.( the tailplane gearbox failing if I remember)
The fix was to wire lock tape around the unions so when they leaked it merely dripped instead of spraying, thus reducing the risk of fire.
Thats possibly why they can't fly today. Sadly.
Best regards
om15
om15 is offline  
Reply
Old 29th June 2007 | 15:11
  #11 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: All over the place
I've tried to persuade the missus that it would look great parked on the drive but so far no go!
gareth herts is offline  
Reply
Old 29th June 2007 | 15:59
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Bournemouth
AR1

and they make truly 'Frightening' reading, maybe thats how it aquired the nickname?

Methinks 'twas because the last aeroplane that most Lightning pilots flew in training en-route to the beast was the Hunter. I well remember being on 226 OCU in '68 at the tender age of 21 and the aeroplane did at the time seem "frightening". It must be one of the few aeroplanes in history where nobody complained about the lack of thrust! Mind you, lack of fuel was a different kettle of fish - short of fuel at the take-off point!

Gareth Herts

I've tried to persuade the missus that it would look great parked on the drive but so far no go!

Jeremy Clarkson managed it for a while....

Wanna see a Lightning low? Go to www.lightningpilots.com and check photos under 5 Sqn. Photographed from the tower - from above!

JP
Jaguar Pilot is offline  
Reply
Old 29th June 2007 | 16:03
  #13 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: UK
A few were lost due to undercarriage extension failure in the early days. Were these problems ever solved (by modification)? Was it ever a problem in service?
Sl4yer is offline  
Reply
Old 29th June 2007 | 18:02
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
From: western europe
I got this for stg 500.00 plus a heck of a lot of 'Pints', to lubricate the negotiations, as I recall ....



Was there a guy near Liskeard who put a Lightning (or something very similar) up on a stand, outside the entrance to his home (it was a big home as I recall) ….
hobie is offline  
Reply
Old 29th June 2007 | 18:16
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Dorset
I believe that the prototype aircraft had the u/c selector positioned on the left hand side just forward of the throttles, this could possibly result in an inadvertant "down" selection if the throttle was pushed fully forward, I remember being told that one aircraft had a down selection at mach 2 resulting in an airframe loss, the u/c selector was moved to prevent a reoccurence.
Early prototypes had canopy losses in flight, this was cured by modifying the mechanism cams.
One Mk 53 belly landed at Tabuk and the gun pack and ventral tank absorbed the impact, the aircraft did not sustain any serious damage and was repairable.
The Lightning was designed and built in very austere conditions with very little political commitment, it really was a classic aircraft.
Best regards,
om15
om15 is offline  
Reply
Old 29th June 2007 | 18:38
  #16 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 48
From: Kammbronn
Was there a guy near Liskeard who put a Lightning (or something very similar) up on a stand, outside the entrance to his home (it was a big home as I recall)
Still there, last time I drove past, outside Castle Motors alongside the A38.
diginagain is online now  
Reply
Old 29th June 2007 | 18:58
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
From: West Sussex
How about the famous story of the poor chap running up a Lightning, sitting on a box with no canopy, who ended up with the flight of a lifetime ?

Though he managed to get it down - a great achievement I'd think - the story did not have a happy ending.

On the other hand, just to please some people, I'll mention it's refreshing to see a Warton product openly labelled 'ineffective'...
Double Zero is offline  
Reply
Old 29th June 2007 | 19:43
  #18 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,399
Likes: 857
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
That was Wg Cdr 'Taffy' Holden - an EngO (who'd flown Chipmunks years ealier). He couldn't get the a/c out of reheat (the test was for a fault which only occurred during rapid acceleration) and took to the skies at Lyneham as a result.

He managed to get it back on the ground OK, but suffered psychological trauma ever after.
BEagle is offline  
Reply
Old 29th June 2007 | 19:58
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
From: western europe
Originally Posted by diginagain
Still there, last time I drove past, outside Castle Motors alongside the A38.
That's the one ..... wonder if he was ex RAF ....
hobie is offline  
Reply
Old 29th June 2007 | 20:11
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,771
Likes: 0
From: West Sussex
Beagle

Thanks Beagle,

sadly that was the way I heard it...I wonder if he'd have got better treatment nowadays - in this case I think he probably would have.

It must have taken a hell of a lot of skill & guts to land it in one piece, the version I heard stated he had several goes - and of course no barrier etc was possible.

There are the other stories which circulate, such as the American loadmaster who took a C-130 headed for East Germany ( & failed to reach it courtesy of a Lightning ) & the groundcrew ( Belgian ? ) chap who pinched an F-16 for a spectacular suicide... Even had a threat to steal a Harrier or Hawk at our place once, which was rather robustly dealt with by a certain Mr. J.F; he was intelligent enough to warn us all, which I doubt others would have done.
Double Zero is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.