Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Query on Vulcan/Falklands War?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Query on Vulcan/Falklands War?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Oct 2006, 08:12
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Godforsakencountry
Posts: 281
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I read "Vulcan 607" which I greatly enjoyed but it got me thinking, dangerous I know, but with all the problems experienced with training Vulcan crews to tank and finding probes, would it have been at all feasible to convert a Victor back to a bomber? No tanking training, probes already fitted and 35 bombs versus 21. Just a thought.

Incidentally, I am at present reading "Razor's Edge: The Unofficial History of the Falklands War" by Hugh Bicheno, and his quite detailed map of the Stanley air defences does not show a Roland missile battery.
Argonautical is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2006, 09:47
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Victor had much of its BombNav system removed. The precision GPI6 had been replaced by the older, simpler GPI 4. The ballistics computer had been removed. The armament electrics had probably been stripped out. The Vicotrs had been greatly reworked by BAE or who ever, including clipping a fair bit off each wing.

The Victor 2 had never been a bomber, only a missile carrier, so it did not have any bomb gear and probably no bombdoors. It did not have the Vulcan Heading Reference System either.

The Vulcan 2 Blue Steel had come with two sets of bombdoors, one for the missile body and one for the free-fall role.

I am sure a Victor crew will be able to confirm this.
Wader2 is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2006, 09:52
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Looking over your shoulder
Age: 50
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would we have managed to achieve this if we had procured the F-111 or kept TSR-2?
Skunkerama is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2006, 09:57
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Skunkerama
Would we have managed to achieve this if we had procured the F-111 or kept TSR-2?
Yes.

UK-Libya-UK 1986
Wader2 is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2006, 10:36
  #65 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,418
Received 1,593 Likes on 730 Posts
Would we have managed to achieve this if we had procured the F-111 or kept TSR-2?
The TSR-2/F-111 was not a V-bomber replacement, it was a Canberra replacement in the tactical bomber role. Which is the type/role which the eventual substitute, the F-4, replaced/assumed.

Not to say that, if bought, the TSR-2 or F-111 would not have lead to the eventual phase out of the Vulcan as their main role disappeared, but it wasn´t the plan.
ORAC is online now  
Old 4th Oct 2006, 11:12
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wader2
The Victor 2 had never been a bomber, only a missile carrier, so it did not have any bomb gear and probably no bombdoors. It did not have the Vulcan Heading Reference System either.

The Vulcan 2 Blue Steel had come with two sets of bombdoors, one for the missile body and one for the free-fall role.

I am sure a Victor crew will be able to confirm this.

I think you'll find that B2's were quite capable of fulfilling the requirement to drop 35,000lbs of conventional weapons from their bomb bay, and get in and out higher and faster than the Vulcan. The Victors failing in the great scheme of things was Sir Frederick Handley Pages' (the owner of the company) refusal to join up with Hawker Siddely or British Aerospace, he lost a fair sized contract over that including another 30? Victors.

Still the government would never interfere with the free market now would it?

Last edited by Kitbag; 4th Oct 2006 at 11:22. Reason: Couldn't remember Sir Freds first name- must be getting old or something!
Kitbag is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2006, 11:51
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kitbag
I think you'll find that B2's were quite capable of fulfilling the requirement to drop 35,000lbs of conventional weapons from their bomb bay, and get in and out higher and faster than the Vulcan.
In design terms probably quite true but by the time of the Falklands all the B2s, which had never been free-fall bombers, had been through Hawker Siddley (forgot the name before) and undergone strip and rebuild. By the time of the FI they would have had no bomb doors, no NBS for the reasons stated, and few Nav Radar (Bomber) who would also have been out of practice. That said, a Vulcan Nav Rad could have used the kit instead.
Wader2 is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2006, 12:06
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree re converting back from K2 standard, I was trying to point out that the B2 was originally designed as a freefall bomber as Blue Steel was introduced after B2.

Anyway, an awful lot 'what ifs'. Would things have been better if the RN had kept its flat tops, would the Argies have considered invading if (fill in your own favourite theory concerning domestic unrest in Argentina/theoretical or actual oil reserves/UK not taking over responsibilities for the islands from the Spanish...etc)
Kitbag is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2006, 12:19
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sussex
Posts: 141
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
I read Vulcan 607 in the summer and found it a real page turner and "unputdownably exciting" and I took part in BB1 so I knew what had happened!!!

The Victor 2's bomb bay was just a huge fuel tank so it couldn't have been resurrected as a bomber.

I think "the bearded bullshi**er", as Beags calls him,should feel very embarrassed at the revelation that he tried to contact the Vulcan.Everyone I've lent the book to has said what a complete ar*e he was for doing that.
farefield is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2006, 13:23
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by farefield
I think "the bearded bullshi**er", as Beags calls him,should feel very embarrassed at the revelation that he tried to contact the Vulcan.Everyone I've lent the book to has said what a complete ar*e he was for doing that.
I wonder if that was actually bullsh**? How much night flying actually took place especially at that time of the war?
Wader2 is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2006, 13:40
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vulcan v the BUFF

At the Greenham Common airshow some years ago I was having a beer or three with a Yankee tanker crew whilst a Vulcan was performing. It had already been announced by HMG that the aircraft was to be 'retired'.
'Such a pity the British government have decided to break that aircraft up' said one of the cousins. 'They could have sold them to the States. We would have put them through the paint shop, given a racey paint job. Restarted production, sold them all over the world, making money for England and the U.S. Air Force would have had a bomber that really worked.'
Sitting just in front of us was a B-52 crew, shrinking lower in to their seats. I am sure they had not been 'noticed' when the remark was passed.
JamesA is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2006, 13:46
  #72 (permalink)  
brickhistory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by JamesA
'They could have sold them to the States. We would have put them through the paint shop, given a racey paint job. Restarted production, sold them all over the world, making money for England and the U.S. Air Force would have had a bomber that really worked.'
But Dr. Strangelove wouldn't have nearly as good. Kinda hard to have the 'dramatic' multi-level scenes of flight deck and nav/radar nav throwing the multiple switches, fighting fires, etc of the B-52 vs the Vulcan's 'a**es to elbows' coziness.................

And was there a way for Slim Pickens to access the Vulcan bomb bay?
 
Old 4th Oct 2006, 13:48
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: firmly on dry land
Age: 81
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by brickhistory
And was there a way for Slim Pickens to access the Vulcan bomb bay?
Only on the one specially modified for the James Bond, Thunderball movie.

Looked good but overlooked that small detail of the huge nosewheel and oleo.
Wader2 is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2006, 14:09
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Rural Somerset
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tombstone
Sharky Ward is a one man band according to his book.

It is true that the SHAR/GR3 guys could have had a pop at the runway however, they would have had to fly within the SAM & AAA umbrella.

The Flag Commander did not appreciate the usefulness of the SHAR's radar and as a result, he ordered them to be used in a manner which became very airframe & pilot intensive, reducing their availability for mud moving jobs.

I think the main issue in terms of why we used the Vulcan is simple & Sharky Ward did not get it at all. The political message passed from the British government to the Argentine leaders, via the Black Buck missions was one of capability and will to attack the mainland if required.

The message certainly got through & the Argie air defence fleet was deployed in a manner that protected the mainland but offered little cover over the Falklands.

Irrespective of the whys, the therefores, the should haves etc etc that continue to surround this sortie nearly 25 years after the event. I, for one who was down there at the time, would like to say the message it gave out within the Task Group was well worth its weight in gold. Political or not I look back on it as a great feat of airmanship and just one of a series of occurrences that contributed to the positive end of the conflict.
Please feel free, however, to continue bickering.

SJ
Strictly Jungly is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2006, 14:15
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Englandshire, mostly.
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Strictly Jungly
Irrespective of the whys, the therefores, the should haves etc etc that continue to surround this sortie nearly 25 years after the event. I, for one who was down there at the time, would like to say the message it gave out within the Task Group was well worth its weight in gold. Political or not I look back on it as a great feat of airmanship and just one of a series of occurrences that contributed to the positive end of the conflict.
Please feel free, however, to continue bickering.

SJ
I wasn't bickering Jungly, I was infact simply answering a question asked earlier in the thread.

Everyone stuck their necks out to win that war, no doubt about it and I think it made us all very proud to be British.

P.S. Sharky Ward is a tw t...
Tombstone is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2006, 14:53
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: shrewsbury
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gosh. And here was me believing for years that everything he wrote was true!

Mind you I thought that about Chickenhawk.

What a plonker.
dakkg651 is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2006, 17:02
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 64
Posts: 2,278
Received 36 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Wader2
Only on the one specially modified for the James Bond, Thunderball movie.

Looked good but overlooked that small detail of the huge nosewheel and oleo.
Not to mention the Rear Crew Table, Pressure Bulkhead, Fuel Tank and two large fuse panels.
ZH875 is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2006, 19:46
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lowlevel UK
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BZ SJ

May I heartily support Strictly Jungly. I joined a surprisingly large group of sailors who gravitated into a T42 ops room during the night just to watch a lonely radar blip appear and track towards East Falkland Island. Please do not under-estimate the value of that sortie at that time, especially to those who were out on picket duty where one can feel somewhat alone.
Data-Lynx is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2006, 00:15
  #79 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
The Black Buck missions achieved far more than was intended.

Bluntly put:

In terms of eliminating its primary objective - it failed.

In terms of scaring the cr@p out of the enemy and forcing them to remove their ONE trained interceptor sqdn north to protect other assets it worked, even if this was un-intended at the time.

This was all it achieved, but it was more than enough. Yes it contributed a lot to global warming, but with the Mirage 3s up north, the final outcome was made a lot easier because Sharkey Ward and Andy Auld and their teams did not have to fight them (even though the outcome would probably have been the same)

I remember the first raid as being a huge morale booster despite working 20hr days at the time.
A job very well done.
Navaleye is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2006, 02:33
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Age: 84
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've read Vulcan 607, quite recently, and it explained to me in some clarity [very necessary in my case] as to why the bomb run was at the angle it was, the antiquated equipment, the bomb-racks recovered from a scrap yard. etc It also made it equally clear that one hit on the runway was all that was required, and the effect on the Argentinians was significant.

SASless, you really need to read the book, and if you can't get one I'll be pleased to loan you mine! It'll blow your hairback!
Samuel is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.