Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Future Carrier (Including Costs)

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Future Carrier (Including Costs)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Aug 2017, 22:49
  #4361 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love the idea that someone thinks all the Naval Aviators have spent long years at sea before they start their pilot/observer training and that they therefore bring something other than a few months at Dartmouth to the Sea Power party
Crab, of all the ill-informed bolleaux you have posted on this forum, that sentence alone blows any credibility you may once have had to kingdom come. Get rid of the chips, old chap, your shoulders will feel much better for it.

By the way: Sir Walter Raleigh was Professor of English Literature at Glasgow University and Chair of English Literature at Oxford University. On the outbreak of the Great War he turned to the war as his primary subject. His finest book on the subject was the first volume of The War in the Air, which was an instant publishing success.

Last edited by rotarywise; 14th Aug 2017 at 23:00.
rotarywise is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2017, 07:54
  #4362 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,331
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
Rotarywise - perhaps you would like to detail all the great seaborne experience of someone joining the RN in the last 20 years and going straight in as a pilot, FW or rotary.

By the way: Sir Walter Raleigh was Professor of English Literature at Glasgow University and Chair of English Literature at Oxford University. On the outbreak of the Great War he turned to the war as his primary subject. His finest book on the subject was the first volume of The War in the Air, which was an instant publishing success.
So, an academic with no flying experience at all, writes about something he has never experienced - especially bearing in mind that airborne warfare in WW1 was a very new and constantly changing discipline - and it is suddenly gospel.

Perhaps it was a publishing success because of his previous tomes on subjects various such as Milton, Wordsworth and Shakespeare - a perfect preparation for writing Naval aviation doctrine
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2017, 09:56
  #4363 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 343
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Most of the ones I ever flew with did everything they could to get a shore appointment to avoid going to sea.
It's called observation bias, the ones who did everything they could to go to sea weren't where you were.
Bing is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2017, 11:25
  #4364 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,331
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
Originally Posted by Bing
It's called observation bias, the ones who did everything they could to go to sea weren't where you were.
No, they were queuing up to get where I was. In the 3 years I was on the staff at CFS(H) at Shawbury, we had probably 10 QHI courses come through, each with 2 to 4 Navy pilots on, all looking for shore-based appointments to avoid going to sea.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2017, 11:44
  #4365 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 343
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Whoosh....
Bing is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2017, 13:45
  #4366 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,331
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
Sorry Bing - I thought you were jumping on the normal crab-bashing bandwagon
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2017, 14:28
  #4367 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"can we put this thread out of its misery?"

They'll only turn up on other threads.......................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2017, 20:49
  #4368 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or confirmation bias i.e. saying that because nearly all wanted to go to CFS then no one must want to go to sea. Confirmed..only wrong. Observation bias would be subconsciously telling sailors to apply for CFS to allow the statement 'no-one wants to go to sea because they all want to go to CFS' to be proved true. Only it isn't.

Just saying...don't really care.

Why would we want a floating thing that could be a hospital, power station, water desalination facility, feeding station, repair facility, secure meeting point and a C5 node whilst also able to conduct ops?

Give me a station in the middle of nowhere with a single runway, more tail than dog and a bar full of one-trick ponies telling you how great they are...zzzzzzz!
gijoe is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2017, 23:21
  #4369 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts

SpazSinbad is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2017, 08:36
  #4370 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,331
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
All looks very impressive - shame Harriet Baldwin couldn't give the real answer as to when the ship would be fully operational and deployable with its F35s on TV this morning.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2017, 08:55
  #4371 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,709
Received 37 Likes on 23 Posts
Still think it's ugly
Davef68 is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2017, 10:07
  #4372 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
UGLY ship somewhere up the river - paddles at ready: VIDEO: HMS Queen Elizabeth arrives in Portsmouth for first time - BBC News
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
QEportsmouth16aug2017.jpg (716.7 KB, 30 views)
SpazSinbad is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2017, 10:31
  #4373 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under a recently defunct flight path.
Age: 77
Posts: 1,375
Received 21 Likes on 13 Posts
Oh good - if she is still there in a fortnight's time I will get a close look at her as we depart Portsmouth on board the Cap Finistere for our autumnal Spanish sojourn
Lyneham Lad is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2017, 14:19
  #4374 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 411
Received 30 Likes on 18 Posts
One of the officers on board her said this morning on the radio that she would be in service for the next 50 years. Really?
57mm is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2017, 21:41
  #4375 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 57mm
One of the officers on board her said this morning on the radio that she would be in service for the next 50 years. Really?
Can't speak for UK carriers, but yes, that is the service life of a modern aircraft carrier. Even the WW2 era USS Lexington had a 48 year service life, the USS Midway, commissioned in 1945, was in service 47 years, and USS Enterprise was commissioned for 56 years.

If that's scary consider this. The youngest B-52 in service today is already over 55 years old and is planned to be retired in 2040, when it will be 78 years old. USAF is currently planning to keep the C-17 flying and in service till after 2115. That'll make many of them over a century old! Mind boggling, no?
KenV is offline  
Old 16th Aug 2017, 22:35
  #4376 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
HMS Hermes in service with RN from 1959 until 1984 then INS Viraat from 1986 until 2017 (56 years in service?).
SpazSinbad is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2017, 21:32
  #4377 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
When the rubba rubba hits the hubba hubba (when did you stop beating your CVF? QE)

UK details F-35B carrier trials 17 Aug 2017 Tim Ripley
""The UK’s Queen Elizabeth aircraft carrier is to spend eight weeks off the east coast of the United States carrying out flight trials next year with Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II Joint Strike Fighters embarked for the first time. Royal Air Force (RAF) Squadron Leader Andy Edgell, the UK’s lead test pilot for the new carrier’s First of Class Flight Trials (FOCFT), told Jane’s on 16 August that the flight trials during the fourth quarter of 2018 would build up to “maximum rate tasking” for two embarked aircraft, four pilots and the ship’s company..." UK details F-35B carrier trials | Jane's 360
SpazSinbad is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2017, 22:39
  #4378 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Australia OZ
Age: 75
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes on 45 Posts
Recently there were questions/comments on the TWIN PEAKS (islands) of CVFs - here are some more answers:

The reasons HMS Queen Elizabeth has two islands 14 Aug 2017
...The twin island design has several other benefits. Wind tunnel testing has proved that the air turbulence over the flight deck caused by the wind and the ship’s movement, is reduced by having two islands instead of one large one. Turbulent air is a hindrance to flight operations and aircraft carrier designers always have to contend with this problem...." The reasons HMS Queen Elizabeth has two islands | Save the Royal Navy
SpazSinbad is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2017, 12:58
  #4379 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Odd then that the worlds largest useer of carriers has never adopted twin peaks........................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2017, 13:40
  #4380 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Australia
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"One large island" was a characteristic of the previous generation of RN carriers. So, in that regard, two islands are an improvement (more useable deck space). With nuclear power, one small (& getting smaller) island is more than sufficient.
2805662 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.