Blair To 'Tough it Out' On Iraq
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: berlin
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Blair To 'Tough it Out' On Iraq
Blair to 'tough it out' on Iraq
BBC News 27 March 2006. British Prime Minister Tony Blair has defended his Iraq policy in a speech to the Australian Parliament in Canberra.
"If the going gets tough, we tough it out," he said, as he stressed the need for a global alliance to fight terror.
This had to include the US, he said, despite the "madness" of anti-American feelings in Europe, Mr Blair said.
Starting his three-nation tour, he said an "interconnected world" meant it was vital to engage in problems like climate change and the Middle East.
In the address - the first to the Australian Parliament by a British prime minister - Mr Blair said the situation in Iraq and Afghanistan needed "toughing out" but this was no time for hesitation.
"This is not a time to walk away but to have the courage to see it through," he said.
He denied democracy had been foisted on Islamic countries but said the way the people had embraced the elections was a symbol of hope and an endorsement for these values.
These are not western ethics but universal ones which should be the right of the "global citizen", said Mr Blair.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NZCH
Age: 49
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Great post, wicked IT skills... but I could have just as easily read this on the BBC news website myself, thanks.
This isn't news. Its a journo piece of rubbish to tide over a slow news day.
What is your point? I couldn't see a point for discussion here?
This isn't news. Its a journo piece of rubbish to tide over a slow news day.
What is your point? I couldn't see a point for discussion here?
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Norwester
Could be that the point for discussion here is that very recently the UK government announced the withdrawal of 800 troops from Iraq, which force reduction may have a marked effect on the Dear Leader’s ability to “tough it out” in that country, particularly as the withdrawal phraseology at the time strongly implied that this was the start of a much awaited pull-out from the Iraq mire.
Perhaps on the day of announcement, either you failed to read about it, as you apparently failed to read the BBC news copied in the original post, or your perception was one of a “slow news day” when any news was merely a “journo piece of rubbish to tide over”?
Finally, I notice that your Pprune join month is March 2006. May I draw your attention to what is generally accepted as the site’s ethos of encouraging debate rather than stifling it?
Could be that the point for discussion here is that very recently the UK government announced the withdrawal of 800 troops from Iraq, which force reduction may have a marked effect on the Dear Leader’s ability to “tough it out” in that country, particularly as the withdrawal phraseology at the time strongly implied that this was the start of a much awaited pull-out from the Iraq mire.
Perhaps on the day of announcement, either you failed to read about it, as you apparently failed to read the BBC news copied in the original post, or your perception was one of a “slow news day” when any news was merely a “journo piece of rubbish to tide over”?
Finally, I notice that your Pprune join month is March 2006. May I draw your attention to what is generally accepted as the site’s ethos of encouraging debate rather than stifling it?
Registered User **
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bush lied , so did Blair and little "Honest" Jonny, alot of People died and continue to do so, they are accountable and they must be made responsible, I'm sick to death of this stifling of any questions or debate.
These men and their administrations do a great dis-service to both the public and Military of the US and UK, its' high time they went. (sans pensions, sans retirement and most of all , sans any shred of credibility).
These men and their administrations do a great dis-service to both the public and Military of the US and UK, its' high time they went. (sans pensions, sans retirement and most of all , sans any shred of credibility).
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: berlin
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Dear Leader is once again trimming his message to his audience – in this case both John Howard, who has nailed his colours firmly to the Iraq mast (and luckily sustained no Australian causalities in-country, to date ) and, of course, George Dubya, who will be carefully watching his poodle’s performance from afar to make sure there is no hint of him peeing on the carpet.
Contrast the bellicose style of "if the going gets tough, we tough it out" so beloved of the Texan Tyro, with this in respect of “drawing down” (a somewhat more temperate expression and not one used by Dubya – but then he doesn’t address the UK voters!). BBC, 13 March 2006 (Northwest can safely ignore as it was only “a journo piece of rubbish to tide over a slow news day”).
“But there are compelling strategic reasons why Britain wants to start "drawing down" (ie reducing) its military presence in Iraq.
The relatively small British Army is now heavily stretched by its commitments in the Middle East, the Balkans and now Afghanistan, where up to 5,700 troops will be deployed for the next three years.
There is also the question of Britain's global reputation, especially in the Arab and Muslim world where the US-led occupation of Iraq is deeply unpopular.
Despite the fact that Iraq's political leaders have yet to ask Western forces to leave, there is a widespread perception in the Middle East that Britain and the US want to remain in Iraq as "neo-colonial occupiers" intent on taking its oil.
Reducing British troop numbers, and in due course handing over security of the southern provinces to Iraqi forces, will go some way towards redressing that perception.”
Surely “toughing it out” shoulder to shoulder with John and Dubya is at odds with both the present day geo-political realities in evidence and the even more pressing realities of limited force capability, imposed by our own dear Chancellor?
Contrast the bellicose style of "if the going gets tough, we tough it out" so beloved of the Texan Tyro, with this in respect of “drawing down” (a somewhat more temperate expression and not one used by Dubya – but then he doesn’t address the UK voters!). BBC, 13 March 2006 (Northwest can safely ignore as it was only “a journo piece of rubbish to tide over a slow news day”).
“But there are compelling strategic reasons why Britain wants to start "drawing down" (ie reducing) its military presence in Iraq.
The relatively small British Army is now heavily stretched by its commitments in the Middle East, the Balkans and now Afghanistan, where up to 5,700 troops will be deployed for the next three years.
There is also the question of Britain's global reputation, especially in the Arab and Muslim world where the US-led occupation of Iraq is deeply unpopular.
Despite the fact that Iraq's political leaders have yet to ask Western forces to leave, there is a widespread perception in the Middle East that Britain and the US want to remain in Iraq as "neo-colonial occupiers" intent on taking its oil.
Reducing British troop numbers, and in due course handing over security of the southern provinces to Iraqi forces, will go some way towards redressing that perception.”
Surely “toughing it out” shoulder to shoulder with John and Dubya is at odds with both the present day geo-political realities in evidence and the even more pressing realities of limited force capability, imposed by our own dear Chancellor?
Last edited by jstars2; 27th Mar 2006 at 06:16.
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Dark Side
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I suppose this is why "Little" Honest JoHnny is the second longest serving and one of the most popular PM's Oz has had.
Get a grip, you might think you care but the great unwashed don't give a rat's about Iraq, AWB, children overboard et al.
You Brits amaze me - you couldn't wait to kick the conservatives out - Tones was going to be the great white hope but when he actually takes a stand on something - oh my god I don't agree with that kick him out.
The year is 2006 not the 1960's!
GAGS E86
Get a grip, you might think you care but the great unwashed don't give a rat's about Iraq, AWB, children overboard et al.
You Brits amaze me - you couldn't wait to kick the conservatives out - Tones was going to be the great white hope but when he actually takes a stand on something - oh my god I don't agree with that kick him out.
The year is 2006 not the 1960's!
GAGS E86
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: berlin
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
eagle 86
I found your post a tad incoherent but I gather the gist is that we should stick with Dear Leader, Tony, because he “has taken a stand”.
Has it never occurred to you that the information which he presented to the UK’s “great un-washed” as the basis for his “taking a stand” turned out to be false and that, therefore, “the great un-washed”, certainly of UK (who, on the contrary, do care about Iraq, WMD, etc) are therefore perfectly entitled to wish the demise, after almost 10 years weary incumbency, of a mendacious incompetent, masquerading as a national leader?
I found your post a tad incoherent but I gather the gist is that we should stick with Dear Leader, Tony, because he “has taken a stand”.
Has it never occurred to you that the information which he presented to the UK’s “great un-washed” as the basis for his “taking a stand” turned out to be false and that, therefore, “the great un-washed”, certainly of UK (who, on the contrary, do care about Iraq, WMD, etc) are therefore perfectly entitled to wish the demise, after almost 10 years weary incumbency, of a mendacious incompetent, masquerading as a national leader?
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Midlands
Age: 84
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Blair - Tough? - More like Thick!
Blair is not tough. He is using this country to try to improve his image as a 'World Leader' and then move on to pastures new, probably somewhere in the EU, on another 6 figure salary and another huge pension. We deserve much better than him to lead us but, that said, I don't see anybody I would care to follow! Honesty and integrity would be useful qualities in a leader!
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Cosford
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wish B liar's dad had 'pulled out' would have saved us from the world of dung we now find ourselves in. Just waiting for our Tone to star in a Horlicks ad...........'How does he sleep at night'
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The gulag
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JS2
When I made any decision it was made on the basis of information available to me at the time...certainly the slant has changed and the decisions taken have been interpreted differently because of different information being received. This will continue as and when more information is received...your post would suggest that you do otherwise...
I notice that you are one of the few who have refrained from calling either the PM or the Pres of the US a liar. Many on this thread have done so without any supporting evidence....amazing how brave and mouthy so many are when hidden behind a screen of anonymity.
Dogfish, your post is unworthy of you, not clever, not smart!
Thank you.
NC43
Originally Posted by jstars2
Has it never occurred to you that the information which he presented to the UK’s “great un-washed” as the basis for his “taking a stand” turned out to be false and that, therefore, “the great un-washed”, certainly of UK (who, on the contrary, do care about Iraq, WMD, etc) are therefore perfectly entitled to wish the demise, after almost 10 years weary incumbency, of a mendacious incompetent, masquerading as a national leader?
I notice that you are one of the few who have refrained from calling either the PM or the Pres of the US a liar. Many on this thread have done so without any supporting evidence....amazing how brave and mouthy so many are when hidden behind a screen of anonymity.
Dogfish, your post is unworthy of you, not clever, not smart!
Thank you.
NC43
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Up North
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I notice that you are one of the few who have refrained from calling either the PM or the Pres of the US a liar. Many on this thread have done so without any supporting evidence....amazing how brave and mouthy so many are when hidden behind a screen of anonymity.
I have frequently referred to Bliar as a liar in public, both to friends and colleagues, and even in print (in a newspaper) over Iraq. I am more than happy to air my views in public, and there is a lot of evidence to point to from the banal (Bliar claims to have attempted to sneak on a flight to the Caribbean) to the unimaginably grave (pick nearly anything he has said about Iraq including WMDs and the death of Dr Kelly).
Strangely I have never been troubled by a lawsuit for either slander or libel. I concede that I would incur the wrath of the boys in blue (or is that black with jackboots?) if I decided to pitch up in Parliament Square in a "Bliar Out" t-shirt or heckle anyone at a Labour party rally...so much for freedom of speech and an apolitical police force!
Bliar is a LIAR and his combination of arrogance, deceit and abuse of power make him the greatest internal threat to the constitutional safety of this country since the Bill of Rights. The more of us who speak the truth about his lies in public the better - ask any random person if they doubt his veracity and the answer will undoutedly be "yes" perhaps embellished with metaphors about ursine defecation or papal religion.
Bliar is a Liar!
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The gulag
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JtD
You are clearly a very brave fellow spouting off to your chums in the mess and in the pub. I suggest you write directly to the prime minister with all your allegations and then attach a distribution list to the various organs of government and newspapers you claim to have written to I suggest the Telegraph, Times and Guardian...then sit back and see what happens...no point in bravely telling your chums in the mess what a liar he is (they probably all agree anyway).
I'm personally not certain whether he has told the truth, or not. I cannot prove it and I suspect neither can you. Therefore, I remain silent on the matter. You can prove he is a liar, can you?
Thank you.
NC43
You are clearly a very brave fellow spouting off to your chums in the mess and in the pub. I suggest you write directly to the prime minister with all your allegations and then attach a distribution list to the various organs of government and newspapers you claim to have written to I suggest the Telegraph, Times and Guardian...then sit back and see what happens...no point in bravely telling your chums in the mess what a liar he is (they probably all agree anyway).
I'm personally not certain whether he has told the truth, or not. I cannot prove it and I suspect neither can you. Therefore, I remain silent on the matter. You can prove he is a liar, can you?
Thank you.
NC43
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NC43
I mainly read this forum and when I do contribute, I try to be objective and informative. So....after objectively reading many of your posts on this and other threads recently, I can only conclude that you are an utter fool.
No, no, thank you.
I mainly read this forum and when I do contribute, I try to be objective and informative. So....after objectively reading many of your posts on this and other threads recently, I can only conclude that you are an utter fool.
No, no, thank you.
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The gulag
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Radar Muppet,
Don't usually reply to such 'reasoned' statements but thanks for that, anyway...the basis for your charitable conclusion seems to be based on...nothing, simply an agressive satement...suggests flabby reasoning somewhere.
Perhaps you are aptly named ..a muppet. (a ventriloquist's dummy)
And thank you once again.
NC43
Don't usually reply to such 'reasoned' statements but thanks for that, anyway...the basis for your charitable conclusion seems to be based on...nothing, simply an agressive satement...suggests flabby reasoning somewhere.
Perhaps you are aptly named ..a muppet. (a ventriloquist's dummy)
And thank you once again.
NC43
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Dark Side
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NC 43
You are dealing with a bunch of priceless prigs - they swing with what ever bandwagon passes by - if RM/JTD/JS2 et al were actually adults when Blair was elected they would have applauded his election as having broken the tedious bondage of the conservatives.
As I stated before - in Oz (as I am sure it is in the UK) the GUW do not care about Iraq/AWB/WMD/poverty in TWC/AIDS - the RU/RL/AFL seasons are upon us - we're in the World Cup of Football - we'll cream the Poms in the next Ashes bout - Johnny rules - life is good!
If you limp dicks are serious climb out of your Ivory Towers become a politician and see how difficult it is to change the world. In the meantime STFU.
GAGS E86
You are dealing with a bunch of priceless prigs - they swing with what ever bandwagon passes by - if RM/JTD/JS2 et al were actually adults when Blair was elected they would have applauded his election as having broken the tedious bondage of the conservatives.
As I stated before - in Oz (as I am sure it is in the UK) the GUW do not care about Iraq/AWB/WMD/poverty in TWC/AIDS - the RU/RL/AFL seasons are upon us - we're in the World Cup of Football - we'll cream the Poms in the next Ashes bout - Johnny rules - life is good!
If you limp dicks are serious climb out of your Ivory Towers become a politician and see how difficult it is to change the world. In the meantime STFU.
GAGS E86
NC43,
You should know better than to engage in a battle of wits with the unarmed! That really does allow one to take every tactical and strategic advantage of the foe.
Utter Fool
I would suggest NC43 is anything but that.
You should know better than to engage in a battle of wits with the unarmed! That really does allow one to take every tactical and strategic advantage of the foe.
Utter Fool
I would suggest NC43 is anything but that.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: berlin
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nutcracker43
I’d like to reply to you properly but your words of 30 March are a little bit impenetrable for me:
Can you perhaps elucidate?
I’d like to reply to you properly but your words of 30 March are a little bit impenetrable for me:
When I made any decision it was made on the basis of information available to me at the time...certainly the slant has changed and the decisions taken have been interpreted differently because of different information being received. This will continue as and when more information is received...your post would suggest that you do otherwise...