Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Centralised Engineering At Lyneham

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Centralised Engineering At Lyneham

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th March 2005 | 21:08
  #161 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: wilts
Don't know about centralisation having bit, but it sure bites.
Trade desks are going to reappear, in the loosest sense, in the form of combined J/K rigger/sootie desk & J/K fairy/leckie desk. It's a start I suppose.
What is going to happen when the numbers of FLMs, oops I mean AMMs, is sufficient? Are the J/Ts, SAC(T) Q Ops, etc currently on HLS going to end up on FLECS? If so will FLECS become split into 4 shifts with 24hr operating? Or will Eng Wing just disappear up it's own arse?
lineslime is offline  
Old 11th March 2005 | 18:26
  #162 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 495
Likes: 49
From: UK
LS,

So is the wheel being reinvented at Lyneham already, LS? I hope the silly sod responsible for the mess there pays for it.

Our SACs have been told that many of them will be booted off the sqn to make room for the new AMMs-the ones who haven't gained Q-OPS will be the first to go. Begs the question, where are these people going to? Can't be 2nd Line, that's going civvy.....
Jobza Guddun is offline  
Old 11th March 2005 | 19:57
  #163 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: wilts
Jobza
We are currently on wheel AL3. As for the SACs they will either be shafted in a style not yet seen, sent to work in a shed somewhere or farmed off to somewhere practicing centralised maint. The silly sod responsible will no doubt be promoted and given a pat on the back for such a jolly spiffing idea, if I had my way they would be left to answer to those affected.

Nasty rumor now of proposed changes to the shifts. Does anyone really think that 4 days, 4 off, 4 nights, 4 off is a good idea? If this does happen then I suppose that all beer calls will have to be held on the 3rd day.

Last edited by lineslime; 18th March 2005 at 19:57.
lineslime is offline  
Old 28th March 2005 | 15:09
  #164 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: my own little world
The internal dream sheets have been released thanks to the latest RIE. The options are to work on HLS as a professional tyre kicker, doing 4 days, 4 off, 4 nights, 4 off. Work on FLECS which will consist of 2 shifts working shifts of 4 on & 4 off consisting of days & nights (how this will work with 2 shifts is beyond me) or a heavy rects team working normal days (this bit sounds familiar) on rects that benifit from continuity.
Whoever came up with the new proposed shift for HLS (4d, 4o, 4n, 4o) obviously hasn't listened to public oppinion as many are against it, guess it was someone who wears a light blue shirt an works Mon-Thur 8-5, Fri 8-3ish with weekends and public holidays off. I don't suppose the days of 3,3,6 will ever return, but then again if you give it another 5 years who knows?
To add to this successful operation morale defeat, the traps in J3 have been cleaned of all poetry because the cleaner hasn't got a sense of humor.
monkeybumhead is offline  
Old 29th March 2005 | 07:42
  #165 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: green fields....
DB.
To answer the question 'has OC eng ever been to Basrah', Errrr NO!
In fact no management above Flt Lt has ever been down to see how things work here, on the J side of life anyway. The other Dets in this part of the world have a minimum of the Sqn WO to fend of interfering busy bodys that this place tends to generate, but not us.

On a lighter note, talking to Aussie J engineers yesterday, they cannot believe that we have gone back to a single line running twin fleet ops after they tried it and then canned it because of the flight safety implications. Oh well.....

As far as lean goes, there have been so far in industry 6 or 7 variants of this system and every time the 'inventors' of the system try it in an engineering environment it fails, so they go away and call it something else. Lean works well in a manufacturing environment where processes can be removed saving time and money(manpower), but in an engineering environment where the work is flexible and non-routine it cannot be adapted as it removes the flexibility and skill base from that environment.........sound familiar!!!!!!
spankedcat is offline  
Old 29th March 2005 | 10:31
  #166 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 545
Likes: 1
From: scotland
Talking of shift cycles, why not try the new shift cycle in ATC at LYE. 2 mornings, 2 afternoons, 2 nights 4 off. This means if you start the cycle on a monday you work part of the next 7 weekends. It is called WTR and is based on no shift being allowed to be longer than 8 hours. You have been warned, you will be next.
KPax is offline  
Old 29th March 2005 | 11:34
  #167 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: my own little world
KP
Can that pattern work with 4 shifts? If not then I don't think it will get implemented on the line, but then again centralised maint has been tried elsewhere and failed so I guess you could be right. I wait with baited breath.
On another point, is the leave policy for this shift pattern day for a day (unlike the 6 for 4 on HLS)?
monkeybumhead is offline  
Old 29th March 2005 | 16:44
  #168 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 495
Likes: 49
From: UK
Wonder how many techies applied for redundancy at Lyneham....

Can we nominate people for it, too?
Jobza Guddun is offline  
Old 29th March 2005 | 18:12
  #169 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
From: UK
1. Quite a lot


2. Er...yes you could.

The redundancy application is confidential.

So you could therefore apply on someone else's behalf. Even if your victim found out in time, the first he would know about it would be when he got a confidential letter confirming receipt of his application! Unless you intercept his mail.

Maybe its already been done and someone is going to get a shock!

I thought of this many months ago, but it is a tadge beyond a jolly prank.
SirPeterHardingsLovechild is offline  
Old 11th April 2005 | 11:31
  #170 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: my own little world
Any ideas what the next big change is going to be? So far I am of the understanding that those who stay on HLS will be doing the flight servicings, role changes and minor rects and FLECS will be doing the rest.
Answers on a postcard please.
monkeybumhead is offline  
Old 14th April 2005 | 15:37
  #171 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: wilts
Just seen the list regarding who is going where and doing what after the next change. Staying on HLS and not happy at all, the only saving grace is that the shifts are staying as they are (2,2,4).
lineslime is offline  
Old 20th April 2005 | 19:23
  #172 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
I hear that she is no longer OC Eng Wing!

Has the Turkey voted for Christmas?
Otis Spunkmeyer is offline  
Old 20th April 2005 | 20:31
  #173 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: Oxfordshire
Isn't that just because she got promoted though? that was the last rumour I head...
glum is offline  
Old 22nd April 2005 | 10:30
  #174 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: wilts
I pitty the poor sod who has to sort out the mess she is leaving behind. Who knows they might decide to change things to, lets say, A line, B line, primary team & heavy rects. But then again we haven't operated from B site yet so watch this space.
lineslime is offline  
Old 22nd April 2005 | 12:04
  #175 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 545
Likes: 1
From: scotland
I believe the AFBLT got the impression that people were not happy with this 'wonderful' idea, in fact they looked a bit shellshocked by the end of the brief.
KPax is offline  
Old 22nd April 2005 | 17:05
  #176 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
From: UK
She is no longer OC Eng Wing. Engineering Wing ceased to exist two weeks ago.

She is, however OC Forward Support Wing.

...and Forward Suppport Wing is not to be abbreiviated to FSW because whoever's idea it was has just realised...that they are

F@cking Stupid...w...w...w...Whatever

Our cousins in the Army may like to brief us on what Forward Support really means!

Or perhaps the Station Rugby team could advise.

And you retired/retarded EngO ppruners may have an opinion.


C'mon Tranche 2

And will you dissolusioned Tranche 2 non-qualifiers stop PVR'ing as its reducing my chances.

Edited to add: If that OC FSW was an April Fool joke, then I have fallen hook, line and sinker!

Last edited by SirPeterHardingsLovechild; 22nd April 2005 at 19:39.
SirPeterHardingsLovechild is offline  
Old 22nd April 2005 | 18:32
  #177 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: my own little world
Lost interest in the goings at the mo as I am buggering of to colder climes, where I hope organisation reigns supreme. Just don't know what I am going to come back to.
monkeybumhead is offline  
Old 22nd April 2005 | 18:34
  #178 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Glowcesestershiiiire
Surely a 3-5-2 formation utilising the wing-back theory would be best
k1rb5 is offline  
Old 22nd April 2005 | 19:31
  #179 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 737
Likes: 0
From: UK
Nice username k1rb5

They'll never work that one out.

Registered Feb 2005. Penetrated the next day.
SirPeterHardingsLovechild is offline  
Old 24th April 2005 | 21:44
  #180 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Glowcesestershiiiire
Now you're just showing off in front of your cyber-mates
k1rb5 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.