Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Wannabes Forums > Interviews, jobs & sponsorship
Reload this Page >

New Thomas Cook cadet scheme

Interviews, jobs & sponsorship The forum where interviews, job offers and selection criteria can be discussed and exchanged.

New Thomas Cook cadet scheme

Old 8th Jun 2010, 21:59
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 1
Hi guys, long time reader - first time poster here.

Having read through this thread a couple of times now, I can't quite understand whether or not the scheme takes you right from the very start? i.e. Little to no flying experience and no medicals.

Sorry I seem a little ignorant, im currently applying to the RAF and looking for a potential back up plans.

Also trying to catch up on the civie street lingo

Cheers for any help!
Rocknerd is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2010, 22:41
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: london
Age: 30
Posts: 2
thanks guys.. i guess just sit tight and watch this is the most reliable source, becuase like was said, as soon as it goes public, this page will balloon. just hope my cv wil be good enough. any rumours on what their looking for? selection and interview process?
paulyboi is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2010, 22:45
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 328
Rocknerd,

Yep - it's ab initio training, zero to hero, right from the start, etc. I imagine many of the successful applicants will have some kind of flying experience though, be it gliding or PPL...

B&S
bucket_and_spade is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2010, 08:40
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 22
If Thomas cook wanted successful candidates to pay for all of the training at FTE Jerez, would that cost be less to those people that had their PPL already, or would you still be required to pay the same and spend the time 'breaking bad habits'?
andrew152 is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2010, 14:39
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: at the whim of people I've never met
Age: 41
Posts: 607
These schemes are generally ab-initio so ppl would likely be disregarded and no discount on training is to be expected
hollingworthp is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2010, 10:53
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 328
What hollingworthp said. A well-known UK integrated school which has recently become an academy used to offer a discount a few years ago but stopped it, for self-sponsored and airline tagged students alike.

A PPL might not save you on course costs but it demonstrates a commitment to, and investment in, flying, amongst other things like (you'd hope!) at least a bit of natural aptitude.

B&S
bucket_and_spade is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2010, 11:13
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 22
thanks for the advice/information.
andrew152 is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2010, 13:13
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Guildford
Age: 45
Posts: 359
Main point already covered (no discount for pre-existing hours), but the one thing not covered that mightbe worth considering if you have a PPL and then go integrated - sponsored or not - is that learning from scratch to CPL/ME/Ir standard with no prior experience is a big hill to climb. Far from impossible (god, even I managed it!) but I would say, from my experience that I feel my confidence and ability to absorb the new information in every flight would have been a LOT higher had I had a lot more hours than I did when I started.

What I'm trying to say is that a PPL won't save you cash explicitly, but it may well save you having additional training (that you need to pay extra for) and it may well help keep your lesson scores up - which in turn helps breed the confidence that is all important for your flight tests.
clanger32 is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2010, 14:34
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 566
Not to mention having a PPL may well help you nudge ahead of the competition during selection tests.
Adios is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2010, 17:05
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 22
well here's hoping!
andrew152 is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2010, 09:34
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: In a dream world inside my head
Age: 37
Posts: 2
New cadet scheme goes live?

Heard from a mate on the inside...looks like they're launching this cadet scheme at the Manchester University Careers fair.

Careers fair website seems to back this up:

Exhibitor A-Z (The University of Manchester)

No details yet on how/when to apply - website suggests 'coming weeks'. Best dig the old cv out...!
blueskiesalways is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2010, 19:35
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Walsall, or Lichfield, or somewhere in between!
Age: 33
Posts: 104
So, anyone manage to get to the Careers Fair up in Manchester today and get to check this out? Any more details?
LessThanSte is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2010, 23:12
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 81
Thomas Cook are only there on Thurday not Wednesday so maybe we will get some posts later...
lander66 is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2010, 11:56
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: london
Posts: 49
so did anyone make it to the fair in manchester? did they give a launch date?
cheers lads..
aviator001 is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2010, 12:47
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 640
Could someone kindly explain why TCX need to offer this scheme when there are so many unemployed pilots out of work/so many from Flybe that would be willing to join anyway, or will it just be a way of having the RHS on a much lower payscale?

In addition, do they get any kick-back from FTE?

Presumably, the course cost will be lower than self-sponsored as TCX must have been able to gain a discount for guaranteeing circa 10 places, i.e. £0.5million - £1 million.

I'm not having a go at the scheme, I just don't really understand why in the current climate.

cheers
FANS is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2010, 13:14
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: at the whim of people I've never met
Age: 41
Posts: 607
My thoughts in no particular order:

a) Probably not too many pilots type-rated on Q400 (purely a guess).

b) Airlines are run by accountants who like the cheapest option and quite a few of these schemes will take on cadets on a reduced FO salary.

c) Airlines are very conservative and the schemes provide a known quantity 'product' with pre-selection and monitoring throughout their training without any commitment to actually recruit anyone who turns out to be a donkey (based on skills or more likely personality / work ethic etc) so it's a bit like a year long interview process taking place during the training.

d) Most airlines don't recruit captains but would like to take pre-selected FO's who would be suitable for LHS are are likely to be loyal enough to hang around long enough to make the move.

Probably other reasons but that is some of why I think these schemes form part of the recruitment these companies conduct.

DISCLAIMER: These are only possible explanations and not my personal beliefs - so no requirement for flaming .... muchas.
hollingworthp is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2010, 12:03
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Duxbai
Posts: 117
As someone who was at the receiving end of the previous AIH/MYT cadet scheme, perhaps I could pose the following answers to FANS;

I fully accept that there are many unemployed/ low hour pilots currently out there doing their level best to secure employment. I most certainly wish all could find the right job in the right place. The facts behind the establishment of this scheme were to provide TCX with a reliable stream of well qualified, known individuals. They will be monitored throughout their training with feedback to TCX from both the FTE and FlyBe. The cadets know this, and if anything it makes you feel a part of an organisation even before you really join it.

This scheme affords TCX the ability to plan ahead for the arrival of the cadets which works well given upcoming retirements etc. There may be pilots now, but who knows in 2-3 years time.

The idea of a scheme such as this was always to try and 'gain' a pilot for life. Sometimes this works and sometimes it doesn't. There are still many ex cadets in the company and many have progressed easily into the LHS.

Don't be under any illusion that TCX will not be contributing to this. A very strong case had to be made at board level for financial support in a very difficult trading environment. The comittment is there from the company and I feel the scheme will help both parties.
flyinthesky is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2010, 12:14
  #98 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Face down on a waxed monkey
Posts: 607
This is why I have come out of BALPA - It has no teeth.
Why are we as professional pilots standing for this?
The market is saturated with good pilots, why do we need more cadet schemes coming through?
We need to unite, tell BALPA that if this isnít sorted in 6 months, they can shove their membership. There should be a %age of the pilot workforce as cadets, not like Easy, RyanAir etc... all jumping on the cadet-train and it becoming the norm.
It is currently, with 3000TT, impossible to get a job thanks to the greed of the airlines. And don't blame the banks for the climate, this has been forming for years as more cadets take the 100k plunge. I am thinking of changing my name by deed and applying myself.

Last edited by PAPI-74; 21st Jun 2010 at 12:26.
PAPI-74 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2010, 14:31
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: london
Posts: 49
not to sidetrack where this conversation is at, but, does anyone know when the scheme is being launched for definate?
aviator001 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2010, 17:39
  #100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: At the whim of crewing
Posts: 132
I am going to agree on this - I think BALPA should be taking the fight against this scheme.

It is not fair to the currently employed and the currently unemployed in the industry.

There are hundreds of experienced FOs and Captains out there with B757/B767/A320 experience (often with thousands of hours!), and yet here there is an offer to install a whole new selection of inexperienced pilots onto the line.

BALPA need to take a stand against schemes like this, while the going is still good. It is not a popular idea inside the industry and will increase a great deal of resentment across the board.
assymetricdrift is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.