Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

Polar Arbitration III(a)

Wikiposts
Search
Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

Polar Arbitration III(a)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Feb 2008, 22:16
  #201 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr. Lilly is just an angry old man stirring the pot. I have flown with some real characters out of the northwest corner in MIA over the past 30+ years, but never in my life heard a pilot insult another fly-boy when he does not even know the circumstances. I think he should up his prozac.


By the way RIlly, I guess if you had been on board the a/c that box would not have dared to come apart.

Sheeech What a D___ Head you are
Kruger Stellman is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2008, 00:49
  #202 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Earth, or thereabouts
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nah, last time in Miami was 03/04/00.

Pretty much puts ya outta the current loop then, eh?


Man I done seez some stupid Long Beach posting in this thread, but 8 years vacant and authority, that takes the cake.

Or am I just assuming the post was mo/da/yr format, I does get confused about them. If I confabulate the slashes into different places, the latest I get ya is at training 4 years ago.

Ohhh... now I see.

Well too bad. Condolences to Bob Fell
MetAl is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2008, 00:53
  #203 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: US
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lilly - just curious, do you still live outside of Wichita?
WhaleFR8 is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2008, 01:09
  #204 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Planet Earth
Age: 65
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't want to break up the insult trading, but this just came out and is somewhat on topic in some sections pertaining to the arbitration and new developments.

Originally Posted by AAI VARS
Good afternoon Crewmembers. This is MEC Chairman David Bourne with a VARS update for Sunday February 17th, 2008.

Tuesday and Wednesday of this week, the Negotiating Committee will be in Washington at the direction of the ALPA Executive Council to meet with the Polar Negotiating Committee to begin working on joint areas of concern as both groups prepare for the possible Joint Contract negotiations that will result in the Single Collective Bargaining Agreement, or SCBA, that will govern the merged pilot group.

The Executive Council and ALPA President Prater were clear that these discussions needed to begin so that, in the event the Company's merger grievance against the Polar MEC is upheld. You may also recall that both the Atlas and Polar CBAs, and ALPA Merger Policy require these joint negotiations. The Company's merger grievance is scheduled to be held March 25th to the 27th. We understand that the Company has also asked for additional dates to ensure the case can get heard and a decision issued as soon as possible. In the unlikely instance that the Company's merger grievance is not upheld, we and your Negotiating Committee will be ready to begin immediate Section 6 negotiations, but those will be OUR negotiations, not joint negotiations with any other MEC.

Again...let me be clear about this weeks meetings. They are NOT for the purpose of preparing for separate Section 6 negotiations, as has been suggested by a recent Polar Negotiations Committee Update. The Executive Council and President Prater have made it very clear that the sole purpose of these meetings is to get ready for the SCBA negotiations.

On to other matters. As you know, the Company has already announced the acquisition of two additional -400s for the Atlas fleet, and we are hopeful that is just the beginning. Our first new hire class has passed their orals and are now in the sims. A new hire class started this past week and another will be starting shortly. We're also happy to note that the Company has a class of retired crewmembers coming back, as First Officers. Obviously, the Training Center is busy, and we can expect this will be the case for the balance of the year to cover growth, new customers, and any expansion flying for DHL.

The Spring Quarter Council meeting will be held on Tuesday, March 25th at the Hilton Garden Inn- 2100 East Mariposa Avenue, El Segundo CA. The meeting will start at 3pm.

On the scheduling front, our meetings last week with the Scheduling Committee were productive. Atlas reports that they have found the source of the latest problem. Apparently, AIMS changed the PBS program without coordination with the Company. They now think that they have the PBS software problem fixed that created havoc in last month's bid. As a result, we have directed the Scheduling Committee to pay close attention to the bid scrub this month and if the system is not working well, to implement an alternative plan and take immediate corrective action. Our patience with AIMS is wearing thin.

We've been advised by the company that a number of AMC operations into Bagram AFB in Kabul have been scheduled. The first operated today, and two are scheduled for next week. We understand that Atlas is not the first carrier to operate for the AMC into Bahgram. We have been told that over the past several months there have been dozens of such missions by some of our competitors. Regardless, we take these missions very seriously, and have been in discussions with the Company about the security situation. Not surprisingly, these missions will be planned for no layovers. If there is an AOG, the crew will remain in secure housing on base. The company has also advised us they intend to voluntarily invoke the "Hostile Area Pay" provision of the CBA for all operations into Bagram. As soon as we have more information, we will advise you.

The Company has advised that it will be announcing its 2007 financials at the end of February. That means profit sharing will be paid shortly thereafter, likely by March 15th. And given what we have already heard, the Atlas crewmembers will be enjoying an even larger profit sharing check than the record pay out from last year. We will be meeting with the Company, together with ALPA National financial staff, to review the distribution formula. Bottom line -- it's nice to share in the success that we had a major role in making happen.

In closing, yesterday, your MEC unanimously, authorized the filing of Article 8 charges against the Polar MEC. We took this action very reluctantly, recognizing the seriousness of doing so, but under the circumstances felt we had no choice. Their ongoing verbal attacks against the Atlas Crew members, including actions sanctioned by them intended to harm your careers and the reputations simply could not be tolerated any longer. We will include a copy of the letter with the blast mail of this VARS and post it on the website. Freedom of speech is one thing; when it crosses the line to open slander of you and others, we can and will demand sanctions. Especially when an ADR Board, authorized by the Association has fully exonerated you. Again, it was not our first choice in taking this action against another MEC, but after all other efforts to stop this harassment have been rejected by the Polar MEC chairman, we simply had no other real option.

That's it for this update. Thanks for calling.
Until the next update after the joint contract discussions in Washington with the Polar Negotiating Committee this week...fly safe.

Link to Article VIII Charges: Click here for PDF
nitty-gritty is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2008, 01:38
  #205 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: US
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In closing, yesterday, your MEC unanimously, authorized the filing of Article 8 charges against the Polar MEC. We took this action very reluctantly, recognizing the seriousness of doing so, but under the circumstances felt we had no choice. Their ongoing verbal attacks against the Atlas Crew members, including actions sanctioned by them intended to harm your careers and the reputations simply could not be tolerated any longer.
Well this should be interesting. Bob F. gone. Bobb H. going and Robin next.

WhaleFR8 is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2008, 15:23
  #206 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whale
Don't hold your breath.
BELOWMINS is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2008, 16:45
  #207 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Navarre
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whale, I guess you haven't read any of your past posts. Maybe it is you who should be brought up on charges.
As for Bobb and the rest of the council. As can attest that they are extemely honorable and I noticed that the charges filed are very vague with no substance. Maybe if it were more specific, I would take notice, but as it is....nah.
layinlow is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2008, 20:00
  #208 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Planet Earth
Age: 65
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by layinlow
Maybe it is you who should be brought up on charges.
As for Bobb and the rest of the council. As can attest that they are extemely honorable...
I believe he was, along with about 160 other Atlas guys. All found to be innocent by ALPA National of the Polar charges under a special ADR and even later given "Battle Stars" from ALPA National. That was not what the Polar MEC and membership wanted though, so they continued their hate and blame campaign to this day to anyone that will listen despite the ALPA ADR findings.

So much for extremely honorable. Maybe you should review the ALPA Code of Ethics and remember that Polar collectively has to comply with them also. Not just when it pleases them.
nitty-gritty is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2008, 21:50
  #209 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: KLAX
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Well this should be interesting"

Yes it should - Uncle Bobb sure seems to have his hands full.

At any rate - best of luck to those crewmembers who find themselves operating into OAIX. With the classic now expendable, I suspect that hull insurance rate's was more of an AAWW issue than pilot safety. For this reason alone a -400 would unlikely be used there.
L-38 is offline  
Old 18th Feb 2008, 22:23
  #210 (permalink)  
742
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...For this reason alone a -400 would unlikely be used there.


And you would be wrong.
742 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.