Originally Posted by Dilbert68
(Post 10250407)
No FUB, I have too much self respect to stoop that low. You keep on training though, I'm sure all your friends and relatives are very impressed.
Im sure you’ll keeping turning up for your PCs so spare us the hypocrisy. |
Originally Posted by Dilbert68
(Post 10250310)
The trainers have the real power here. They could resign from training and bring the company to its knees but instead they will happily train their D-scale replacements. The ones that don't have their heads buried in the sand have them shoved up managements a$$es.
WAKE UP!!! You are going to get a sign or be fired contract within the next 5 years when the numbers look favorable to the company, just as they did in 1999. You trainers have to be the most selfish or stupid people in the company. but hey, it has been years we hear the same mad dogs all night long, and everybody is at work quietly in the morning...we get used to it, and the funny thing is sadness turns into entertainment.. Anyway, I really wish you all the best for the future, and feel sorry for the attitude Cx still holds. |
STW is on the money. and my mates at HKA are watching. The consensus re schooling allowance, for example, screws both company’s pilots. it’s a dog eat dog world. |
STW, I dont know which market you are looking at - if I went to another airline at the same rank I would be getting a 20% pay rise. When I started at Cathay, our pay way benchmarked to lead other Oneworld peers - BA, Qantas, American. Then to match them. Then it was compared to “other major airlines”. Now we are supposed to believe that our real competition is AirAsia and Ryanair? As for a pay rise to cover inflation, that would be great! I’d happily accept going back to the pay scale that I joined on if it was corrected for the inflation over the intervening years. I’m sure that HKPA could also easily be indexed to the rental market too. Now that would definitely reduce the decimation of the pilot body. |
but the shareholders Ato are unconcerned about your salary sliding south as long as pilots keep applying. From anywhere. read STW again. |
The job I’m interviewing for. I’ve had enough of this place! |
Your solution.
|
Originally Posted by Threethirty
(Post 10250967)
Let me think, FedEx, UPS, Delta, American, United.... Which brings me to point #2, looking at the hourly pay at $304 for a year 15 captain at FedEx and then thinking that’s 16 years down the road from when you joined isn’t quite correct either. None of the USA carriers mentioned are getting you into the LHS in a widebody in under 25 years. Though I’d love to hear if that’s changed. Point #3, guys can do CC all they want if it makes them feel good, it’s a minor inconvenience to the company with all the new trainers joining and the people helping out in every way shape and form. I’d argue these days it’s more of an inconvenience to the employee than to the company, but it’s all we have. No criticism of the GC intended. |
Originally Posted by morningcoffee
(Post 10251504)
I’ll just take the first one as an example. Do you actually have any idea how difficult it is to get into Fedex? An employee can sponsor one applicant every 10 years and you ain't getting a look in the door without a sponsor. Turning up with shiny 777 time isn’t really much help in the big picture, sorry to say. Which brings me to point #2, looking at the hourly pay at $304 for a year 15 captain at FedEx and then thinking that’s 16 years down the road from when you joined isn’t quite correct either. None of the USA carriers mentioned are getting you into the LHS in a widebody in under 25 years. Though I’d love to hear if that’s changed. Point #3, guys can do CC all they want if it makes them feel good, it’s a minor inconvenience to the company with all the new trainers joining and the people helping out in every way shape and form. I’d argue these days it’s more of an inconvenience to the employee than to the company, but it’s all we have. No criticism of the GC intended. And what is the important thing is they are really really happy and excited about their job again. |
We must roster in strict senority. If we don't the company will use the CMP to minimise costs on a minute by minute basis using the cheapest pilot.
They will roster the COS18 sods low hours so they are desperate for hours (money) and will work G days, when fatigued and when sick. Do you want to work with a fatigued / sick low hour wonder? Roster stability will be reduced for all of us. Fairshare gives no clarity and wont be fair. |
Don’t worry CX management will realise in few years what they have done and will change course. As per usual CX is behind times. CX is where the US companies were 10 years ago as far as employees appreciation and value. Also, CX supports LGBT community but DO NOT support traditional family value otherwise it will realise that NO ONE can start a family with this salaries in HK. Meditate on it. |
Many of the more senior pilots tried to warn everyone that the only system that works in the long run is "strict seniority". Many of you replied that we were being "selfish" and that as we were senior, we were being self-serving. Well, now you can see the main reason for strict seniority: with a whole new, separate COS, they can use the non-seniority rostering system (which we chose) to effectively provide more efficient rosters for the COS18 pilots (to get their hours up), and give us the remaining rubbish. We've done it to ourselves, because we wouldn't adopt the only proven system in civil aviation. I hate to say I told you so....
|
Wait till type transfers are tweaked in only the way CX can to move COS18 crew where they want.
If anything is achieved by CC it must be TYPE TRANSFERS IN STRICT SENIORITY including crew being able to downgrade for LIFESTYLE choice! |
CMP and COS18 will be looked back on as the moment in time that CX died as a career airline for pilots. We can argue all we like, that will be shown to be fact in hindsight. Its time for anyone with hopes of a viable career to wake up to reality and make a move as soon as possible. It is over. |
Originally Posted by Avinthenews
(Post 10251809)
Wait till type transfers are tweaked in only the way CX can to move COS18 crew where they want.
If anything is achieved by CC it must be TYPE TRANSFERS IN STRICT SENIORITY including crew being able to downgrade for LIFESTYLE choice! |
Originally Posted by morningcoffee
(Post 10251504)
None of the USA carriers mentioned are getting you into the LHS in a widebody in under 25 years. Though I’d love to hear if that’s changed. |
COSPLAY18 in all its glory, brought to you by the Jellyfish and his partner the Ayatollah.
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....2f8714399d.jpg https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....6c81260260.jpg |
There is a lot more to a career than the time it takes to get to the left seat. I’ll also point out that upgrading at the US carriers (and Some EU) is often delayed by choice. A very senior FO with their choice of schedules and fleet (because of the seniority system) almost always has a significantly better schedule and in some cases better pay than a junior captain. |
Originally Posted by CaliforniaPilot
(Post 10251952)
It has at FedEx. LHS widebody is half that time per the last system bid. Of course, FedEx's fleet skews toward the heavy side. LHS on the 757 in under 5.
|
Originally Posted by mngmt mole
(Post 10251755)
...provide more efficient rosters for the COS18 pilots (to get their hours up), and give us the remaining rubbish...
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:08. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.