Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

Some food for thought...

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

Some food for thought...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd September 2002 | 10:54
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
The poor labour relations between cockpit crew and management obviously has a detrimental effect on the safety of Flight Operations at Cathay Pacific.
What evidence do you have to justify this rather bold statement?

The safety at CX is currently second to none.

I am no shorty but I cannot simply stand by and read this cr@p without comment "obviously" indeed!

Last edited by mole; 3rd September 2002 at 12:57.
mole is offline  
Old 3rd September 2002 | 15:36
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 436
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
Mole , why slang me. Your point was well made anyway, give the poor old Shortly a break for goodness sake.
shortly is offline  
Old 3rd September 2002 | 15:46
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: reality
There is no flight safety problem, just an awfully pathetic attempt at scaremongering by a small minority who cannot accept that they have lost.

HandyAndy by the way CX Management DO know who Thrust is.

Before you start with the management plant, first post, newly registered cr@p, this is a new callsign because I don't want to get involved in this under my normal one.

Enjoy
fartingale is offline  
Old 4th September 2002 | 14:38
  #44 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 16
From: GC Paradise
Perhaps I was a little blunt?

Maybe I should have said, "that the poor labour relations between cockpit crew and management obviously *..................... the safety of Flight Operations at Cathay Pacific."

* Please insert one of the following according to your political persuasion or perspective on the world:

1. has a detrimental effect on
2. has no effect on
3. actually improves

I wonder what a Professional Pilot would think?
FlexibleResponse is offline  
Old 4th September 2002 | 15:55
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Hi there Mr. SOLO. Long time no spar.....

Equating me with the mole, that's a bit OTT

Why are you even bothering to contribute here?

You obviously disliked CX and therefore made a very good and sensible decision to move on (as did others like you). You told me before that you are now glad you did and are enjoying life after CX.

So what are you doing here other than stirring the excrement?

Or perhaps you've discovered , as many have, that the grass is not so geen on the other side...???

Have a nice day
cheesecake is offline  
Old 5th September 2002 | 07:31
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
Cheesy, how are you?

I got an email from an old forum lurker and came over for a quick stir of the pot. As you know most went into the AOA forum and I was dissapointed to see the vitrol here but obviously can't help.

Even the most basic of posts seems to bring an attack. Sad.

I post because I can. Worried...

I would close the forum down if it were mine. As I said, I'm glad I left the forum.

I don't dislike Cathay (don't believe I ever said anything of the sort) and I left because I had a better offer. Remember, it is a career and I made my choice. The grass is lush. Greener? Who knows. I wouldn't trade my old CX job for it.
SOLO is offline  
Old 5th September 2002 | 09:53
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: omni
Hey Thrust,

How about giving the "ignorant lot" a piece of your mind regarding those vortex generators, etc.?
sub4 is offline  
Old 16th May 2003 | 12:16
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: Knulpville
So Hottie you got the guernsey how you enjoying working with these gents?
Knulp is offline  
Old 21st May 2003 | 03:45
  #49 (permalink)  
short flights long nights
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 4,017
Likes: 327
Talking

Going back to the orginal question...what the hell does all this stuff, triple slotted flaps...vortex generators and whatever, have to do with safely flying an aircraft? Am I to assume (let the abuse begin) that to fly for CX you need to be not only a pilot but a aeronautical engineer as well?
SOPS is offline  
Old 16th June 2003 | 11:24
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: australia
hottie,

I believe that generally speaking a vortex generator placed on an engine nacelle is there to combat a destructive vortex produced by the nacelle in the slower flight area.
The vortex gererator will produce a vortex which will redirect the destructive one essentially cancelling it out.Some may redirect it to an area where it may even become usefull....

again, this is generally speaking.

try searching tech log... i recall reading some information regarding this subject there.
cold is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.