PC/RT
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
....at least Henry acknowledges a higher power than himself, unlike most of the unmitigated narcissists that populate our cockpits. Henry doesn't make the rules on these type of changes. His job is to ensure the smooth and safe functioning of the operation. On that basis, he does a very good job. If you were aware of the daily nonsense he has to deal with you would be far more sympathetic to him and his burden.
No, i'm not 'Henry', but I am aware of the daily frustrations he has to deal with. Just be glad there is someone in that job who has a conscience and a desire to do the best job possible.
I have no doubt the usual anonymous venom will follow this, but it doesn't change the truth about Henry. He is a good man who deserves our respect.
No, i'm not 'Henry', but I am aware of the daily frustrations he has to deal with. Just be glad there is someone in that job who has a conscience and a desire to do the best job possible.
I have no doubt the usual anonymous venom will follow this, but it doesn't change the truth about Henry. He is a good man who deserves our respect.
He was a good Star Chamber member. And he is remunerated very well for dealing with his "burden".
He also has the option of going back to the line. Or a very comfortable retirement, which will be far more comfortable than that facing most of the pilots to which he is laying down the law.
I find the hypocrisy of some of these people with an imaginary friend very hard to take.
He also has the option of going back to the line. Or a very comfortable retirement, which will be far more comfortable than that facing most of the pilots to which he is laying down the law.
I find the hypocrisy of some of these people with an imaginary friend very hard to take.
Last edited by Captain Dart; 12th Nov 2012 at 20:40.
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
heard a good rumour during my last RT/PC that this change had been introduced because our senior statesmen found the RT too difficult.....practicing with a PC for an RT, surely not?
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ahhh Trafalgar
So Henry has a conscience and acknowledges a higher authority. Did that higher authority not have some Commandments, specifically one about adultery?
How come Henry and his conscience turned a blind-eye when one of his Flight Training managers......... Well you know the story......
How come Henry and his conscience turned a blind-eye when one of his Flight Training managers......... Well you know the story......
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: N. Am.
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's all about cost. If a certain arbitrary percentage of pilots can perform to standard during a one day PC, then the next logical step for the company will be to lobby for elimination of the RT all together - thus saving simulator time (cost) and improving productivity of the crew force (since they'll have more availibility for revenue flights - again, cost).
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Home
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One problem is that often scheduling will give you an RT/PC at the end of leave. For skippers it's an easy life since you get a sector monthly. For F/Os doing relief on the Triple who can go 60 days legally between getting a landing, you can easily go a full 9 weeks with leave tagged on before rocking up for your PC.
In the past scheduling used the RT to get guys legal after leave, it is obviously cost efficient to do it this way.
To me this change doesn't as some posters on here say, keep us all in the same boat with regards to currency.
In the past scheduling used the RT to get guys legal after leave, it is obviously cost efficient to do it this way.
To me this change doesn't as some posters on here say, keep us all in the same boat with regards to currency.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Asia
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wtf
The only reason we Asa group fly V1 cuts to a reasonable standard is because we practice. As an average you will do one in the RT and one in the PC or four V1 cuts per year. If reversing the cycle reduces that amount then safety is REDUCED !
Every pilot can benefit from sims. if you think you can't benefit you are dangerous.
I would bet that 95 % of us could pull off a v1 or v2 cut , worst case scenario , with no practice, but would it be a 5 or a 3 or worse ? Practice makes perfect.
FG
Every pilot can benefit from sims. if you think you can't benefit you are dangerous.
I would bet that 95 % of us could pull off a v1 or v2 cut , worst case scenario , with no practice, but would it be a 5 or a 3 or worse ? Practice makes perfect.
FG
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only reason we Asa group fly V1 cuts to a reasonable standard is because we practice. As an average you will do one in the RT and one in the PC or four V1 cuts per year.
STP
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Home
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
suck it up b1tches. what happens online if you haven't sat in the seat for 89 days and have a v1 cut?
geez what a bunch of whiners.....
geez what a bunch of whiners.....
Which would you prefer?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
what happens online if you haven't sat in the seat for 89 days and have a v1 cut?
1. It would be handled safely, and the safety of the aircraft would never be in doubt. HOWEVER, as alluded to in a previous post, the mouth music might not be spot on perfect, and there might not be a lot of "finesse", but there wouldn't be a problem.
2. The DFO will give a 1 line "tip of the hat" to the crew in his weekly Flight Ops update.
3. The CEO/CFO in the weekly update that goes to every employee across the globe will write a few lines on what a great job the airport staff did in arranging the service recovery, yet little, or probably no, mention will be made of the cockpit or cabin crew involved.
4. The airport supervisor on duty will win a Betsy award for arranging the handling of the affected passengers.
That's all well & good on the line, but in the sim on your PC, heaven forbid that you don't use the spot on mouth music, or that you fly it less accurately than the autopilot, or that you lack "finesse". These things really matter in CX!
Last edited by broadband circuit; 15th Nov 2012 at 20:50. Reason: spelling
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Smogsville
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A mate said the plan is eventually to do the PC, a pass results in the RT becoming redundant and therefore reserve! An unsatisfactory PC has you doing a RT (with a STC) so it's PC/PC 
My 'last' airline ran one simulator session every 3 months which included one regulatory ('jeopardy') item and the rest was training.
Just enough to keep us in the books at a relaxed level and to provide ongoing, realistic training to keep us current.
Probably too big a leap for this outfit.
Just enough to keep us in the books at a relaxed level and to provide ongoing, realistic training to keep us current.
Probably too big a leap for this outfit.