HKCAD criticism
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Too Far North
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HKCAD criticism
Apparently criticism/discussion of HKCAD and it's ATC problems is not permitted on PPRuNe ???????????????????????
If it is OK to discuss problems in UK, ME, Australia and other places why is HK immune/protected?
Who pulled the thread .... and why?????
If it is OK to discuss problems in UK, ME, Australia and other places why is HK immune/protected?
Who pulled the thread .... and why?????
Think the thread originator (lazygal) got cold feet after the last post and deleted the thread. At least I hope its not anything more sinister.
Interesting thread over here:
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=326361
What chance CAD paying US$800 for an overtime shift? -SFA I'd say!
Guess its just more
useless TOIL and vapourizing leave.
Interesting thread over here:
http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=326361
What chance CAD paying US$800 for an overtime shift? -SFA I'd say!
Guess its just more
useless TOIL and vapourizing leave.
Last edited by LapSap; 13th May 2008 at 12:55. Reason: extra beer made me add "******* useless"
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: UK
Posts: 7,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fascinating thread indeed and not pulled by us.
We have to give you guys the right to change your mind and delete a post. Wouldn't have it any other way - would you?
Binning the first post on a thread kills it off I'm afraid but there's no reason why you can't precis and continue here.
Rob
We have to give you guys the right to change your mind and delete a post. Wouldn't have it any other way - would you?
Binning the first post on a thread kills it off I'm afraid but there's no reason why you can't precis and continue here.
Rob
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SCMP
From South China Morning Post, along the same lines?
May 10, 2008
My column advocating a third runway for Hong Kong's airport and ways to increase air traffic capacity has attracted a lot of response. Two prominent academics have written articles in other newspapers to discuss the issue. Law Cheung-kwok, from Chinese University, says it is absolutely necessary to build a third runway, but even with one - and an increase to 90 flights an hour - the airport will reach its capacity in 2015. He estimates that the third runway would contribute HK$56 billion in economic gains to Hong Kong.
Thomas Chan Man-hung, of Polytechnic University, points out two constraints on our air industry. First, Hong Kong's development is in conflict with the Pearl River Delta's master plan. Second, the air space is controlled by the mainland.
Despite these challenges - or because of them - building a third runway is imperative. Increasing the capacity of the two existing runways is also feasible. The lack of action is simply due to the bureaucratic behaviour of the Civil Aviation Department.
The replies from Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng to the Legislative Council on April 30 indicate that she has totally bought the arguments of the Civil Aviation Department bureaucrats.
According to Ms Cheng, Hong Kong's air traffic capacity is limited by the hilly landscape. I think this is nonsense. Kai Tak airport, with a single runway and situated in the heart of an urban area, could accommodate 37 flights per hour. Chek Lap Kok, with two runways and a much more agreeable environment, should be able to handle twice that amount. Indeed, the new airport has been servicing more than 70 flights an hour during peak periods.
Ms Cheng's reply on manpower is also very unsatisfactory. I put it to her that Hong Kong should recruit more air traffic controllers from overseas. Her answer was that a batch of foreign recruits was hired in 1997 but about 70 per cent subsequently quit. She said the lesson learned was that training local staff would be a more cost-effective way to use public resources.
Ms Cheng is obviously being misled by the Civil Aviation Department. Foreign controllers left simply because their pay became unattractive as a result of the fall in value of the Hong Kong dollar. The government could have given them special allowances or improved their working conditions, to help retain them. Attractive pay packages will attract talent not just from the US and Europe, but also from Asia and other regions. The Civil Aviation Department is resisting an increase in air traffic capacity because its manpower is already stretched. It is understood that most air traffic controllers consistently work very long hours and cannot take their leave. Some cannot even take half of their entitled annual leave, with others clocking up more than 200 hours of compensation leave for overtime work.
The planning parameters of the department are to allow 15 per cent of its staff to be on leave at any one time. But, the existing situation is such that, for example, one staff member had to handle stressful work for eight months of her pregnancy. I understand that the staff-shortage situation is even more acute after 6pm, which explains why capacity is lower in the evenings. This kind of working environment will not only damage health, it will eventually affect air safety. This is a problem of mismanagement.
I understand that there are two camps with the Civil Aviation Department. The more progressive group supports increased runway capacity, while the traditional bureaucratic camp is resisting change. The result is that management does not dare fight for the necessary resources to expand its operations.
It is ironic that the government is spending HK$3 billion on the new Civil Aviation Department headquarters, but not a cent on recruiting more controllers. One cannot help but ask whether the government is building a white elephant, or aiming to sharpen Hong Kong's competitiveness in air transport. I think it is time the chief executive looked at the problem. Hong Kong's leadership position in air transport will soon be overtaken by regional competitors if we do not act quickly. We risk losing it forever.
My column advocating a third runway for Hong Kong's airport and ways to increase air traffic capacity has attracted a lot of response. Two prominent academics have written articles in other newspapers to discuss the issue. Law Cheung-kwok, from Chinese University, says it is absolutely necessary to build a third runway, but even with one - and an increase to 90 flights an hour - the airport will reach its capacity in 2015. He estimates that the third runway would contribute HK$56 billion in economic gains to Hong Kong.
Thomas Chan Man-hung, of Polytechnic University, points out two constraints on our air industry. First, Hong Kong's development is in conflict with the Pearl River Delta's master plan. Second, the air space is controlled by the mainland.
Despite these challenges - or because of them - building a third runway is imperative. Increasing the capacity of the two existing runways is also feasible. The lack of action is simply due to the bureaucratic behaviour of the Civil Aviation Department.
The replies from Secretary for Transport and Housing Eva Cheng to the Legislative Council on April 30 indicate that she has totally bought the arguments of the Civil Aviation Department bureaucrats.
According to Ms Cheng, Hong Kong's air traffic capacity is limited by the hilly landscape. I think this is nonsense. Kai Tak airport, with a single runway and situated in the heart of an urban area, could accommodate 37 flights per hour. Chek Lap Kok, with two runways and a much more agreeable environment, should be able to handle twice that amount. Indeed, the new airport has been servicing more than 70 flights an hour during peak periods.
Ms Cheng's reply on manpower is also very unsatisfactory. I put it to her that Hong Kong should recruit more air traffic controllers from overseas. Her answer was that a batch of foreign recruits was hired in 1997 but about 70 per cent subsequently quit. She said the lesson learned was that training local staff would be a more cost-effective way to use public resources.
Ms Cheng is obviously being misled by the Civil Aviation Department. Foreign controllers left simply because their pay became unattractive as a result of the fall in value of the Hong Kong dollar. The government could have given them special allowances or improved their working conditions, to help retain them. Attractive pay packages will attract talent not just from the US and Europe, but also from Asia and other regions. The Civil Aviation Department is resisting an increase in air traffic capacity because its manpower is already stretched. It is understood that most air traffic controllers consistently work very long hours and cannot take their leave. Some cannot even take half of their entitled annual leave, with others clocking up more than 200 hours of compensation leave for overtime work.
The planning parameters of the department are to allow 15 per cent of its staff to be on leave at any one time. But, the existing situation is such that, for example, one staff member had to handle stressful work for eight months of her pregnancy. I understand that the staff-shortage situation is even more acute after 6pm, which explains why capacity is lower in the evenings. This kind of working environment will not only damage health, it will eventually affect air safety. This is a problem of mismanagement.
I understand that there are two camps with the Civil Aviation Department. The more progressive group supports increased runway capacity, while the traditional bureaucratic camp is resisting change. The result is that management does not dare fight for the necessary resources to expand its operations.
It is ironic that the government is spending HK$3 billion on the new Civil Aviation Department headquarters, but not a cent on recruiting more controllers. One cannot help but ask whether the government is building a white elephant, or aiming to sharpen Hong Kong's competitiveness in air transport. I think it is time the chief executive looked at the problem. Hong Kong's leadership position in air transport will soon be overtaken by regional competitors if we do not act quickly. We risk losing it forever.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kursk
Age: 72
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HKCAD
This has a lot more to do with the current state of the HKCAD than is apparent. The "new wave" of talent, doesn't have much experience, and they don't wnt to admit it.
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CAD can start getting out of the problems by buying back TOIL.
Nats AVAA (THE V IS FOR VOLUNTARY
) rate is £300-£550 per day.At my unit it's £400.CAD have no chance of giving the leave,and will not pay you back when you depart.
Then they have to address numerous issues,one of which is the age of the Gweilos.When I got there I was almost the youngest at 37,and most expats were late 40's to early 50's.I'm 47 now so most of the Gweilos must be hitting retirement soon.I was one of the 70% that worked my contract (QUIT??!!).CAD were such an underhand outfit to work for,that 3 years was plenty for me.The TOIL robbers.
The biggest problem is CAD being linked with the Civil Service.This must be cut if they have any chance of progressing at all.They can't recruit or modernise without big brother watching over.And they are still sore about losing Kai Tak.
Get over it,it's been 10 years now.
Nats AVAA (THE V IS FOR VOLUNTARY
) rate is £300-£550 per day.At my unit it's £400.CAD have no chance of giving the leave,and will not pay you back when you depart.Then they have to address numerous issues,one of which is the age of the Gweilos.When I got there I was almost the youngest at 37,and most expats were late 40's to early 50's.I'm 47 now so most of the Gweilos must be hitting retirement soon.I was one of the 70% that worked my contract (QUIT??!!).CAD were such an underhand outfit to work for,that 3 years was plenty for me.The TOIL robbers.
The biggest problem is CAD being linked with the Civil Service.This must be cut if they have any chance of progressing at all.They can't recruit or modernise without big brother watching over.And they are still sore about losing Kai Tak.
Get over it,it's been 10 years now.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: asia
Posts: 947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have no criticism of the CAD , after all, in these days of flying green, what's wrong with sending people out to do circuits in an aircraft that half the time, the candidate has flown before in another country
After all, bumps in the actual a/c were all the rage during WW2
I'm sure poor old Oasis just loved throwing away 50K USD/session to keep their pilots current when there where ZFT sims everywhere
" Keep a good look out for Jerry laddy, NO, thats the bomb bay doors not the gear handle !! "
Completely Antiquated and Delusional.
, after all, in these days of flying green, what's wrong with sending people out to do circuits in an aircraft that half the time, the candidate has flown before in another country After all, bumps in the actual a/c were all the rage during WW2
I'm sure poor old Oasis just loved throwing away 50K USD/session to keep their pilots current when there where ZFT sims everywhere
" Keep a good look out for Jerry laddy, NO, thats the bomb bay doors not the gear handle !! "
Completely Antiquated and Delusional.
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Stinkin' Harbor
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fascinating thread indeed and not pulled by us.
...........
Binning the first post on a thread kills it off I'm afraid but there's no reason why you can't precis and continue here.
Rob
...........
Binning the first post on a thread kills it off I'm afraid but there's no reason why you can't precis and continue here.
Rob
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: UK
Posts: 7,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Everyone's paranoia follows various cycles so binning the thread is disappointing but probably understandable CKC.
Wonder is expressed here after Rice Whine's protest at the top though.
Will we be getting any actual content from said poster or was it just a chance for a moan at us?
Thread's open for folks to get stuck in. Or has the moment passed us by?
Rob
Wonder is expressed here after Rice Whine's protest at the top though.
Will we be getting any actual content from said poster or was it just a chance for a moan at us?
Thread's open for folks to get stuck in. Or has the moment passed us by?
Rob
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not sure if there will be a lot of feeback from the HK lot.I think they don't want to be identified just incase the CAD witholds gratuities,or doesn't renew contracts.The locals are too scared of Management.I don't really care because I left in 2001,but really absolutely nothing has changed there.Except it's got busier.The article in the SCMP was spot on though.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Too Far North
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with Dyce regarding the HKCAD employees. Paranoia is rife in Hong Kong for a reason - management really is out to get people.
I, like Dyce, am ex HK so am intimately familiar with the problems that exist there and I have no doubt that things get worse by the year. i do feel however that only those that are left there can contribute accurate information about the situation and what needs to be done.
Once again the paranoia issue raises its ugly head and I understand why people "on the ground" are unwilling to speak out.
The advantage of an anonymous forum like this is that those who are game enough can actually provide some useful and interesting information.
Also, it is up to those people to speak out and make "the outside world" aware of just how bad the situation really is. They are the only ones who can provide the information to the world at large that will bring about changes - management certainly wont do anything unless forced by public/professional pressure - or a very nasty incident.
From what I have read here and in other forums about HK the dreaded TOIL system is being abused even more that in the past and traffic levels are ever increasing whilst staff/experience levels are dwindling.
This, combined with the cr@ppy roster, long commute times and lots of waiting for the bus - to get to and from the ATC complex - can only add up to increased fatigue levels amongst controllers. The ever present battle to get vacation leave and justly earned TOIL only exacerbates the problem.
As anyone in the aviation business knows, fatigue can only result in one thing - vastly decreased performance with predictable results.
Be strong guys (and gals) it is about time HK management woke up to themselves.
I, like Dyce, am ex HK so am intimately familiar with the problems that exist there and I have no doubt that things get worse by the year. i do feel however that only those that are left there can contribute accurate information about the situation and what needs to be done.
Once again the paranoia issue raises its ugly head and I understand why people "on the ground" are unwilling to speak out.
The advantage of an anonymous forum like this is that those who are game enough can actually provide some useful and interesting information.
Also, it is up to those people to speak out and make "the outside world" aware of just how bad the situation really is. They are the only ones who can provide the information to the world at large that will bring about changes - management certainly wont do anything unless forced by public/professional pressure - or a very nasty incident.
From what I have read here and in other forums about HK the dreaded TOIL system is being abused even more that in the past and traffic levels are ever increasing whilst staff/experience levels are dwindling.
This, combined with the cr@ppy roster, long commute times and lots of waiting for the bus - to get to and from the ATC complex - can only add up to increased fatigue levels amongst controllers. The ever present battle to get vacation leave and justly earned TOIL only exacerbates the problem.
As anyone in the aviation business knows, fatigue can only result in one thing - vastly decreased performance with predictable results.
Be strong guys (and gals) it is about time HK management woke up to themselves.
38Controller
Thank you for confirming to the rest of the ATC world the atmosphere of Fear, Intimidation and Suppression that has been present within our system these past few years.
How about ATMD facing reality and operating to a level that their staff resources allow, rather than pretending that our current level of service can be maintained. Fancy new procedures dreamt up by the guys on the 4th Floor are useless without additional staff. More Sectors??? You must be kidding. We dont even have enough staff to man the ones we have already!
Controllers are sick and tired of working extra shifts for no extra pay to prop up the system.
How about ATMD facing reality and operating to a level that their staff resources allow, rather than pretending that our current level of service can be maintained. Fancy new procedures dreamt up by the guys on the 4th Floor are useless without additional staff. More Sectors??? You must be kidding. We dont even have enough staff to man the ones we have already!
Controllers are sick and tired of working extra shifts for no extra pay to prop up the system.
Last edited by LapSap; 17th May 2008 at 05:27. Reason: grammar
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the terms and conditions in HK are out in the public domain now,and it up to ppruners to make up their minds.The facts on an employer and it's ways,can have a real impact especially when there is a worldwide shortage of controllers.
The only reason most of the expats went to HK was the money.It was the best in the 90's but it isn't anymore.Most places have caught up,and one or two are better.People put up with the B lloks and just thought of the cheque.
So what happens when the expats retire soon.Or is CAD going to keep them until you have a 70 year old on approach.
The only reason most of the expats went to HK was the money.It was the best in the 90's but it isn't anymore.Most places have caught up,and one or two are better.People put up with the B
lloks and just thought of the cheque.So what happens when the expats retire soon.Or is CAD going to keep them until you have a 70 year old on approach.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think our beloved management is worried about any expats leaving. Rumour has it that George Chow, James Hui, Michael Pang and Peter Lok will be coming back to set up a new sector for old timers.
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Szechuan
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TOIL
The management encashed the time off in lieu in Kai Tak days, why they don't do that now? Shortage of staff noted, people work on suck roster noted... The management should do something to improve the staff morale. "Money makes the mare go".
ck roster noted... The management should do something to improve the staff morale. "Money makes the mare go".
Last edited by TOIL; 17th May 2008 at 15:01. Reason: missing a full stop.
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: England
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is this what you mean...?
Frankly the whole HKGCAD are a bunch of pedantic, worthless time serving beaurocratic tosspots who wouldn't hold down a job as a tai pan in the dunny in Delaneys if they weren't civil servants...... it would save the SAR a whole shed load of dosh if they just sent the department to its sole customer and cut out the middleman. 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the ''Traditional Bureauctric Camp'' must be costing the AA and airlines a bob or two.With oil at $126 a barrell and climbing,what is their justification for causing delays.Daaa we miss Kai Tak so much,we'll turn CLK back to 50 years ago and the good old days.
Lack of ATC staff is about to implode.Perhaps they aren't aware of the implications of a real nasty.Who are the ones that could be in the dock.Yes the management.
Lack of ATC staff is about to implode.Perhaps they aren't aware of the implications of a real nasty.Who are the ones that could be in the dock.Yes the management.