Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

To Cathay Pilots

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

To Cathay Pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st June 2001 | 19:44
  #1 (permalink)  
ISC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post To Cathay Pilots

To all Cathay Pilots,

Your own in house forum is being beta tested at present. It will be ready for your use very soon. You will be notified by email when the site is ready for traffic.

It is requested that you be patient during this time.

It is also respectfully requested that you desist from becoming emotionally involved in topics on this forum for very obvious reasons.

Regards,

ISC
 
Old 21st June 2001 | 22:56
  #2 (permalink)  
a330
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

thanks for the info mate and pls do let us know when it's ready . also remeber to drop an e-mail informing us ..

regards ,
a330
 
Old 22nd June 2001 | 03:01
  #3 (permalink)  
bengi25
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Angel

Gentlemen:

Obviously the management is under pressure. They are on fishing expeditions to see if they can catch any information that they can use. They will resort to every dirty, lowdown trick in the book. Expect It!

Also, the press is hungry. This is probably the biggest story in Hong Kong since the Asian Financial Crisis and the 1.5 million Mainland Chinese looking for the "Right to Abode".

I am sure the Union's website will be up and running soon. The boys are a bit busy. We can all help, by volunteering to help the Union with such tasks. So call the Union.

In the meantime, try is refrain from using this site. We are united now, so they will be looking for ways to get that sword between us.
Let's play it smart.

Regards
Bengi 25
 
Old 22nd June 2001 | 13:28
  #4 (permalink)  
endo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

ha, ha, a330.

Methinks a CX ID number may be required for the new forum.

Maybe then we can get some peace from you!

------------------
- in motion
 
Old 22nd June 2001 | 20:04
  #5 (permalink)  
411A
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Wonder if the "local guys" will be invited to join, as they were excluded from CX for so many years.
 
Old 22nd June 2001 | 21:46
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
From: HKG
Angry

411A, That really is a contemptible commemt. The 'Local' guys as you so insultingly call them have been members of the AOA (and committee members) since they joined. I've tried to treat you with a certain amount of courtesy but its obviously wasted. Just tell us the name of your airline , if you dare, so that we all (from all the pilot groups you've insulted), can see what the worlds greatest pilot and manager has achieved!!
BusyB is offline  
Old 23rd June 2001 | 01:35
  #7 (permalink)  
411A
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

BusyB---
"Contemptable comment" you say? Well, I have known CX guys from more than twenty years ago and they considered CX to be ONLY for the privileged few.. May not be so now, but sure has been for a very long time, and in the past. If not so now, well it's about time.
Have to say tho that your management is incredibly shortsighted. It would seem that your rostering problems could be fixed with minimal effort. 'Tis a shame that that they are so confrontational, but I guess that's the name of the game these days.
I certainly hope to avoid these problems with our own small organisation.
IF your group plays its cards right, you just might prevail.

[This message has been edited by 411A (edited 22 June 2001).]
 
Old 23rd June 2001 | 02:22
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 0
From: HKG
Angry

Doesn't make any difference to the standard of your comment, you're really plumbing the depths now 411A. If you're so great what have you got to hide? I think you've shown your true colours now and its not a pretty sight. Your comments on every forum have shown not just your inflated ego, but a supreme lack of interest in facts and truths. I feel really sorry for your staff, its no wonder you won't tell us who you work for. I'm afraid SOG really does cover you to a T.
BusyB is offline  
Old 23rd June 2001 | 03:01
  #9 (permalink)  
411A
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Actually BusyB, I probably "know the facts" much better than you could imagine. I have been in the airline industry a very long time. As for Cathay, well it's probably better if you did have you own forum, that way the dirty laundry would not be for all to see.
Folks who live in glass houses should not throw stones.
 
Old 23rd June 2001 | 03:30
  #10 (permalink)  
RRAAMJET
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Angry

411A: I think an apology is probably well in order - that was really off the mark. I doubt whether you know any of the Asian pilots in CX - I do - and I think they would agree you're off base here.

You flew for SV; now that was an epitomy of smooth flight, wasn't it? No problems there, eh? Now you fly for some wannabe outfit in the desert; I can't help thinking your continual jabs at other carriers is motivated by a good bit of jealousy at the career stability you never had. The CX pilots are trying to get the ship back in level flight - you can't seem to appreciate that.

Even if you represent management, your above comments were so out of place that I doubt anyone in CX management would agree with you.
 
Old 23rd June 2001 | 04:23
  #11 (permalink)  
fossil fuel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Come on guys, just ignore this loser. Won't be long now.
 
Old 23rd June 2001 | 04:41
  #12 (permalink)  
411A
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

RRAAMJET--
Apology, from me? Think not. I will give you an example of the kind of pilots/management
you have had in the past. Distant past, but still the past.
A certain British Captain (and fleet manager) upon his retirement from CX, joined SQ as a B707 Line Captain. He signed a two year contract, same as the rest of us. I ran into him in dispatch one day and he mentioned that if this was Cathay, there would not be any local guys in the right seat because...."they are not worth a damn". I then asked him if any local guys had ever been considered for a pilot position with CX, and his answer was ..."positivly not".
Remember, this was 1979, so the attitudes at CX may well have changed.
This particular Captain was so disliked by the local F/O's on the 707 fleet, that many called in sick when rostered with him.
If I mentioned his name (and I will not because it is not permitted on the forum) you would know of him instantly, provided you have been with CX for quite some time.
If the prospects for the local guys at CX have changed, good. 'Tis a shame it was not done a long time ago. If it had been, you may well have a lot more support for your planned industrial action.
BusyB--
As our company is still under formation, any details would be premature. However, we intend to treat our flightdeck personnel with the highest of respect and pay them quite well. I have learned long ago that to do otherwise is foolhardy indeed.
 
Old 23rd June 2001 | 04:47
  #13 (permalink)  
Peter Zee
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

You poor, poor little man. Anyone can find SOMEONE to support their narrow-minded ideas if they just search hard enough and are conveniently selective. Your pompous little "proof" of some attitude at CX is supported by: a.an unverified account of an un-named individual b. from over 20 years ago c. that is one individual amongst hundreds if not thousands.

Gee, seems pretty conclusive to me! Wake up and join the year 2001. You're an embarassing anachronism.
 
Old 23rd June 2001 | 05:18
  #14 (permalink)  
FL390
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

Surely CX management will be able to get a copy of some'ID' and will therefore have acess to the forum!

So, it is a waste of time as far as I can see now. What you really need is an Internet site where actual pilots are given the password by post or something unrelated to CX. That way you can guarantee privacy unless someone lets slip as it were.
 
Old 23rd June 2001 | 05:37
  #15 (permalink)  
411A
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Well then PeterZee, I have one little question. Exactly how many local pilots were employed by Cathay Pacific Airways in say 1979? 'Tis a fair question, considering that CX had been in existance for a long time. Other long time CX crew (now retired)have told me many times; exactly ZERO.
On the other hand, at SIA, quite a few. In fact, a rather large number.
Of course you do not owe me an explanation, but I find where folks are so defensive, where there's smoke, fire cannot be far behind.
 
Old 23rd June 2001 | 06:33
  #16 (permalink)  
fossil fuel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

IGNORE. Do NOT waste your time with this retard.
 
Old 23rd June 2001 | 06:36
  #17 (permalink)  
Gas Chamber
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Angry

411A,
You are a little man! I think you would be more suited to the Wannabes forum. GC
 
Old 23rd June 2001 | 06:54
  #18 (permalink)  
jtr
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

411,
Currently, about 10% of Cathay’s pilot force are local employees. Do you know how many applications from SUITABLY QUALIFIED local applicants CX receives? Me neither, but I bet it is a lot less than 10%. So why is it that CX employs a DIS-PROPORTIONALLY LARGE number of local pilots?

please refer

http://www.thebird.org/assholes/
 
Old 23rd June 2001 | 07:39
  #19 (permalink)  
411A
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

jtr---
And SIA has about 70% local guys. Clearly, the training and advancement of these pilots in SIA was a priority. Apparently not so in Cathay. Some of course would say..."because there were no suitable applicants", or...."we must maintain our standards"...and the list goes on. Like I said before, IF you had more local guys as pilots, your planned action undoubtedly would have more local support. As it is now, the planned action will only label the pilots as greedy, self-centered interloping individuals.
And for this, you can blame you past management. They did you NO favors.
 
Old 23rd June 2001 | 08:31
  #20 (permalink)  
Thrust
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Singapore has an airforce, HK does not. Singapore airlines has significant government investment, Cathay Pacific does not. Cathay is 100% answerable to it's shareholders, Singapore airlines is less so!

Chalk and cheese.

SOG.
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.