FI Course CAVOK Hungary
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FI Course CAVOK Hungary
Anyone got any recent experience with this school and in particular their flight instructor courses?
It seems very reasonable compare to other schools across Europe...
It seems very reasonable compare to other schools across Europe...
What sort of pricing are they offering? also, you'd need to add the extras for accommodation, food etc., as opposed to doing this closer to home. I've been considering going 5 hours away (by car) to do an FI course, but this would require me to rent accommodation etc. for 6-8 weeks - as opposed to paying more for the course at driving range from home - and I can keep my "normal" life at the same time. Also consider where you're planning to use your FI rating after you've got it. I believe (not sure though) that it's worth doing the rating with an ATO closer to home, if that's where you're planning on using is.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What sort of pricing are they offering? also, you'd need to add the extras for accommodation, food etc., as opposed to doing this closer to home. I've been considering going 5 hours away (by car) to do an FI course, but this would require me to rent accommodation etc. for 6-8 weeks - as opposed to paying more for the course at driving range from home - and I can keep my "normal" life at the same time. Also consider where you're planning to use your FI rating after you've got it. I believe (not sure though) that it's worth doing the rating with an ATO closer to home, if that's where you're planning on using is.
Home for me would be Norway and there is no flight schools here that offer the flight instructor courses so that would not be possible for me. I already have an offer to fly at a club here and regardless I would need to do it abroad which they are fine with.
Some places offer quicker courses if they theory is done beforehand! Have you heard about Multifly in Hungary?
Some places offer quicker courses if they theory is done beforehand!
I can't think of any FIC instructors who would be happy to accept a student who had completed the theory elswhere. In most cases they would just do it again. The requirement for a FI Course is that you complete it at an ATO under the supervision of a Head of Traiming. There is no provision for mixing and matching bits of courses at different locations. If you did, I doubt that anyone would want to employ you afterwards.
I have seen the results of a number of cheap FI Courses over the years, to the unsuspecting candidates they were nothing more than a waste of money.
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Hungary
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did my FI course at Cavok last summer. They are quite a big flight school in the area, operating from Gödöllő Airport, which is 20 km away from Hungary. However if you don't have a car, it is troublesome to get to the airport if you live in Gödöllő or Budapest. But I think they offer airport accommodation as well. The instructors are really friendly, I know some of them personally for years. I keep my aircraft in the same airport, so I see Cavok operation almost every day. They fly a lot if the weather is good, so you can finish the course pretty fast. They have AT3, Tecnam P2002, Viper aircraft. I don't have experience with those as I did the training in my own plane, a Pipistrel Virus SW 121. To sum up, instructors are nice, airport has its retro-style charm, with 1 km long grass rwy, and close enough to Budapest. I liked the FI course itself as it deepened my knowledge in many ways. I developed skills I use very often when I instruct my students nowadays.
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As a HoT, I had to standardise a new instructor from this school to start teaching at the ATO that I was responsible for.
I also teach FIC and examine for pilot licences plus MEP.
I wrote to the CAA saying that the course that CAVOK taught was non compliant, no Teaching and Learning theory was covered, board briefs had not been taught or practiced. From what I could work out all they did was fly around.
The ssment of competence that was done in Hungary was just a short flight along the lines of a PC with no lesson assessed at all.
I had to teach all T & L theory, and about 7 hrs instructor training.
in my professional opinion I would strongly advise anyone considering a FIC to avoid this school at all costs. Unofficially, the CAA are of the same opinion.
I also teach FIC and examine for pilot licences plus MEP.
I wrote to the CAA saying that the course that CAVOK taught was non compliant, no Teaching and Learning theory was covered, board briefs had not been taught or practiced. From what I could work out all they did was fly around.
The ssment of competence that was done in Hungary was just a short flight along the lines of a PC with no lesson assessed at all.
I had to teach all T & L theory, and about 7 hrs instructor training.
in my professional opinion I would strongly advise anyone considering a FIC to avoid this school at all costs. Unofficially, the CAA are of the same opinion.
As a HoT, I had to standardise a new instructor from this school to start teaching at the ATO that I was responsible for.
I also teach FIC and examine for pilot licences plus MEP.
I wrote to the CAA saying that the course that CAVOK taught was non compliant, no Teaching and Learning theory was covered, board briefs had not been taught or practiced. From what I could work out all they did was fly around.
The ssment of competence that was done in Hungary was just a short flight along the lines of a PC with no lesson assessed at all.
I had to teach all T & L theory, and about 7 hrs instructor training.
in my professional opinion I would strongly advise anyone considering a FIC to avoid this school at all costs. Unofficially, the CAA are of the same opinion.
I also teach FIC and examine for pilot licences plus MEP.
I wrote to the CAA saying that the course that CAVOK taught was non compliant, no Teaching and Learning theory was covered, board briefs had not been taught or practiced. From what I could work out all they did was fly around.
The ssment of competence that was done in Hungary was just a short flight along the lines of a PC with no lesson assessed at all.
I had to teach all T & L theory, and about 7 hrs instructor training.
in my professional opinion I would strongly advise anyone considering a FIC to avoid this school at all costs. Unofficially, the CAA are of the same opinion.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: York
Age: 53
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The decision making part of the CAA is currently hamstrung by its overwhelming desire to maintain as much alignment as possible with EU legislation in the hope of achieving some sort of mutual recognition agreement. Consequently, there is little to no chance that they will take any action against an organisation that holds EASA approval, no matter how damning the opinion of their front line staff who actually understand the problem. There are plenty of other ATOs in eastern and southern Europe that are as bad, if not worse.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Like Ionian Aviation in Megara, Greece !
Stay away, by all means.
Gerrit Pols
The Netherlands
[email protected]
Stay away, by all means.
Gerrit Pols
The Netherlands
[email protected]
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BillieBob -
when I contacted the CAA my main concern was that they had issued a FI rating on basis that the course was completed at an EASA ATO with an AoC.
Their explanation was that they had no choice but to issue the rating because it fell under EU law regardless of how big a risk that is to aviation safety.
Ironic given what the initials actually stand for. I assume now that the U.K. will not have this problem but just consider how many poorly trained flight crew have been produced by these schools.
when I contacted the CAA my main concern was that they had issued a FI rating on basis that the course was completed at an EASA ATO with an AoC.
Their explanation was that they had no choice but to issue the rating because it fell under EU law regardless of how big a risk that is to aviation safety.
Ironic given what the initials actually stand for. I assume now that the U.K. will not have this problem but just consider how many poorly trained flight crew have been produced by these schools.
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Bush
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the last couple years in the UK I've seen FI and CRI AoC's passed with the candidate reporting they never once touched the controls or demonstrated any instructing during the brief flight. I've been asked to send PPL students on their first solo after they had done 5 hours of circuits but never been taught any of Ex.6-10. I've seen a student sent solo on a QXC flight having never done any engine failure training (NONE. Not even one EFATO. She had no idea it was supposed to be part of the syllabus!). I've seen candidates passing PPL tests without demontrating stalling, abnormal circuits or nav diversions. I stopped an instructor sending a ppl student on a solo nav to an airport reporting <1000m RVR for the past 2 hours. The list goes on...
A few years ago I was examined in a dust bowl by an African local who'd never left his country, from an airstrip with lions lying under the pole that presumably once held a windsock. He was an excellent pilot and examiner and I would MUCH prefer him to teach my kids to fly than some of the white shirt, tie and bar wearing instructors I've met at large ATOs in the UK.
It really comes down to the individuals, not the country.
Anyway, that's my old fart lockdown rant done for today. Back to YouTube videos I go...
I've been asked to send PPL students on their first solo after they had done 5 hours of circuits but never been taught any of Ex.6-10.
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Bush
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Then surely as an Instructor, it is your responsibility to ensure that they meet all of the requirements for solo flight. You check the training records to see what they have done so far and how well they have performed. Ask the candidate what they have done and then brief them on all of the requirements for solo flight including holding a valid medical certificate. In this case it would seem they have another 6 hours to do before even thinking about it.
Though surely the bigger issue is that this instructor went through an FIC, AoC, ATO standardisation training, and had performed a couple hundred hours of ab-initio instructing believing this was an acceptable way to teach someone to fly.
All I'm really getting at is that these sorts of things happen all over the world, in every country. I'm sure you've seen plenty of it in the UK in your time Whopity!
I'm sure you've seen plenty of it in the UK in your time Whopity!
