IMC rating & controlled airspace
Guest
Posts: n/a
IMC rating & controlled airspace
For what it's worth I've got an IMC rating, hope to upgrade to an IR soon. Is it legsl to fly in actual IMC in class D airspace (such as Luton or Bristol control zones/ areas) and do an instrument approach? I get wildly varying answers on this from different instructors. Some say no, you have to ask for Special VFR (ie vis at least 3 km, in sight of surface), others say no problem.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Extract from The Air Navigation Order 2000, Schedule 8, Part B 1:
Instrument meteorological conditions rating (aeroplanes) shall within the United Kingdom:
(a) subject to paragraph (c), entitle the holder of a United Kingdom Private Pilot's Licence (Aeroplanes) or a United Kingdom Basic Commercial Pilot's Licence (Aeroplanes) to fly as pilot in command of an aeroplane without being subject to the restrictions contained respectively in paragraphs (2)(c) and (f) of the privileges of the United Kingdom Private Pilot's Licence (Aeroplanes) or (2)(b)(vii) or (ix) Of the privileges of the United Kingdom Basic Commercial Pilot's Licence (Aeroplanes)
(b) subject to paragraph (c), entitle the holder of a JAR-FCL Private Pilot Licence (Aeroplane) to fly as pilot in command of an aeroplane in Class D or E airspace in circumstances which require compliance with the Instrument Flight Rules.
(c) the holder shall not fly:
(i) on a special VFR flight in a control zone in a flight visibility of less than 3 km;
(ii) when the aeroplane is taking off or landing at any place if the flight visibility below cloud is less than 1800 metres.
Paragraphs (2)(c) and (f) of the UK PPL privileges which do not apply to the holder of an IMC rating:
(2)(c) He shall not, unless his licence includes an instrument rating (aeroplane) or an instrument meteorological conditions rating (aeroplanes), fly as pilot in command of such an aeroplane:
(i) on a flight outside controlled airspace when the flight visibility is less than 3km;
(ii) on a special VFR flight in a control zone in a flight visibility of less than 10km except on a route or in an aerodrome traffic zone notified for the purpose of this sub-paragraph; or
(iii) out of sight of the surface.
(2)(f) He shall not, unless his licence includes an instrument rating (aeroplanes) or an instrument meteorological conditions rating (aeroplanes), fly as pilot in command or co-pilot of such an aeroplane flying in Class D or E airspace in circumstances which require compliance with the Instrument Flight Rules.
The refernces to BCPL(A) privileges have exactly the same wording.
-------------------------------
So, you can fly as pilot in command of an aeroplane in Class D airspace in circumstances which require compliance with the Instrument Flight Rules (e.g. in IMC).
I would strongly suggest that you avoid taking any further instruction or advice from those incompetent instructors who were unable to quote this quite fundamental piece of legislation. The fact that you are blundering around the FIR, not knowing the privileges of the licence and ratings you hold is another matter. Ignorance of the law is not accepted by the courts as a valid defence.
Instrument meteorological conditions rating (aeroplanes) shall within the United Kingdom:
(a) subject to paragraph (c), entitle the holder of a United Kingdom Private Pilot's Licence (Aeroplanes) or a United Kingdom Basic Commercial Pilot's Licence (Aeroplanes) to fly as pilot in command of an aeroplane without being subject to the restrictions contained respectively in paragraphs (2)(c) and (f) of the privileges of the United Kingdom Private Pilot's Licence (Aeroplanes) or (2)(b)(vii) or (ix) Of the privileges of the United Kingdom Basic Commercial Pilot's Licence (Aeroplanes)
(b) subject to paragraph (c), entitle the holder of a JAR-FCL Private Pilot Licence (Aeroplane) to fly as pilot in command of an aeroplane in Class D or E airspace in circumstances which require compliance with the Instrument Flight Rules.
(c) the holder shall not fly:
(i) on a special VFR flight in a control zone in a flight visibility of less than 3 km;
(ii) when the aeroplane is taking off or landing at any place if the flight visibility below cloud is less than 1800 metres.
Paragraphs (2)(c) and (f) of the UK PPL privileges which do not apply to the holder of an IMC rating:
(2)(c) He shall not, unless his licence includes an instrument rating (aeroplane) or an instrument meteorological conditions rating (aeroplanes), fly as pilot in command of such an aeroplane:
(i) on a flight outside controlled airspace when the flight visibility is less than 3km;
(ii) on a special VFR flight in a control zone in a flight visibility of less than 10km except on a route or in an aerodrome traffic zone notified for the purpose of this sub-paragraph; or
(iii) out of sight of the surface.
(2)(f) He shall not, unless his licence includes an instrument rating (aeroplanes) or an instrument meteorological conditions rating (aeroplanes), fly as pilot in command or co-pilot of such an aeroplane flying in Class D or E airspace in circumstances which require compliance with the Instrument Flight Rules.
The refernces to BCPL(A) privileges have exactly the same wording.
-------------------------------
So, you can fly as pilot in command of an aeroplane in Class D airspace in circumstances which require compliance with the Instrument Flight Rules (e.g. in IMC).
I would strongly suggest that you avoid taking any further instruction or advice from those incompetent instructors who were unable to quote this quite fundamental piece of legislation. The fact that you are blundering around the FIR, not knowing the privileges of the licence and ratings you hold is another matter. Ignorance of the law is not accepted by the courts as a valid defence.
Guest
Posts: n/a
This confusion has probably arisen because of the fact that the rules changed a couple of years ago. Before then there were certain areas of Class D and E airspace, such as Cardiff, in which flight under IMC with an IMC Rating was prohibited. These were the 'ANO 8' areas - however, a commonsense approach by the CAA greatly simplified things. No longer did people scratch around in very marginal VMC at low level; traffic permitting they could now fly an instrument approach at such places.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Appreciate yr replies.
Rolling circle: thanks for quoting the ANO at length. Should have looked it up myself, I know. By the way, I haven't flown in IMC in Class D/E since getting the rating fairly recently, hence the question. There are 3 airports with instrument appoaches near here, all of which only have ATZ's, so all my approaches have been in to these fields.
Rolling circle: thanks for quoting the ANO at length. Should have looked it up myself, I know. By the way, I haven't flown in IMC in Class D/E since getting the rating fairly recently, hence the question. There are 3 airports with instrument appoaches near here, all of which only have ATZ's, so all my approaches have been in to these fields.
Guest
Posts: n/a
This issue is now relevent to most pilots. Since JAR FCL a multi crew instrument rating renewal is no longer valid for single crew aircraft. I presume therefore that without an IR renewal on single crew aircraft an ATPL is effectivly downgraded to IMC rating privilages when flying light aircraft. Is this correct?
Guest
Posts: n/a
babble, you are correct as far as UK National licences go. However, the JAR professional licences do not automatically include an IMC rating as do the UK National licences. The holder of a JAR ATP(A) with a multi-crew instrument rating would have no IFR privileges in a single crew aeroplane.
It is possible to add an IMC rating to a JAR professional licence for use only in UK airspace by taking the same Skill Test and periodic Proficiency Checks as a PPL holder.
http://www.srg.caa.co.uk/documents/s...date310800.pdf
It is possible to add an IMC rating to a JAR professional licence for use only in UK airspace by taking the same Skill Test and periodic Proficiency Checks as a PPL holder.
http://www.srg.caa.co.uk/documents/s...date310800.pdf
Guest
Posts: n/a
Sorry BEagle, don't see your problem. There is nothing to prevent an existing IMC rating holder taking that rating with him to a JAR licence and continuing to maintain it exactly as he does now. If the JAA licence holder mainatins a single-crew IR then the IMC rating is automatically revalidated with the IR, and lasts for 25 months. Considering that the JAA CPL is, and always has been, a purely VFR licence (akin to the UK BCPL), that seems entirely sensible.
If, however, the CPL (or ATP) holder has only a multi-crew IR then the IMC rating must be revalidated every 25 months by proficiency check. Again an eminently sensible course of action.
If, however, the CPL (or ATP) holder has only a multi-crew IR then the IMC rating must be revalidated every 25 months by proficiency check. Again an eminently sensible course of action.
Guest
Posts: n/a
NO!! A UK CPL has always included IMC and Night Rating privileges. The fact that Johnny Foreigner's licence doesn't is nihil ad rem. A multi-crew IR may be added to a UK CPL, but an IMC Rating is implicit.
JAA licences issued upon conversion from existing UK CPLs SHOULD therefore continue to include IMC Rating privileges for those who maintain the equivalent validity of their UK licensing requirements.
If not, then why not? Or wasn't it invented in Europe?
JAA licences issued upon conversion from existing UK CPLs SHOULD therefore continue to include IMC Rating privileges for those who maintain the equivalent validity of their UK licensing requirements.
If not, then why not? Or wasn't it invented in Europe?
Guest
Posts: n/a
watford, thanks for your reply. Perhaps you could clear up a related issue.
To maintain a SEP class rating JAR FCL requires that (if I do not do a SEP class rating proficiency check) I must fly 12 hours on SEP or TMG in the 12 months preceeding rating expiry and (quote):
(B) complete a training flight of at least 1 hours duration with a flight instructor. This flight may be replaced by any other proficiency check or skill test for a class or type rating.
I interpret this as meaning that if I pass my annual type rating proficiency check for a transport aeroplane (in the simulator), I do not need to do the 1 hour training flight. Again is this interpretation correct?
Of course if I later need (or choose) to do a bi annual IMC rating proficiency check then the issue becomes academic, but right now I still have my UK ATPL with built in IMC rating priviliges.
To maintain a SEP class rating JAR FCL requires that (if I do not do a SEP class rating proficiency check) I must fly 12 hours on SEP or TMG in the 12 months preceeding rating expiry and (quote):
(B) complete a training flight of at least 1 hours duration with a flight instructor. This flight may be replaced by any other proficiency check or skill test for a class or type rating.
I interpret this as meaning that if I pass my annual type rating proficiency check for a transport aeroplane (in the simulator), I do not need to do the 1 hour training flight. Again is this interpretation correct?
Of course if I later need (or choose) to do a bi annual IMC rating proficiency check then the issue becomes academic, but right now I still have my UK ATPL with built in IMC rating priviliges.
Guest
Posts: n/a
BEagle - No need to bother the Belgrano, simply look at the ANO 2000, Schedule 8, Section 1.
UK CPL(A) - Privileges of a UK PPL(A) which includes an IMC rating and Night Rating.
UK ATPL(A) - Privileges of a CPL(A) without the restriction of public transport only in single pilot aeroplanes.
If you hold a valid UK CPL or ATPL you have IMC rating privileges. Why does everyone insist on making things more difficult than they really are?
The fact that the IMC rating should have been strangled at birth is another matter.
UK CPL(A) - Privileges of a UK PPL(A) which includes an IMC rating and Night Rating.
UK ATPL(A) - Privileges of a CPL(A) without the restriction of public transport only in single pilot aeroplanes.
If you hold a valid UK CPL or ATPL you have IMC rating privileges. Why does everyone insist on making things more difficult than they really are?
The fact that the IMC rating should have been strangled at birth is another matter.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Yes, Rolling Hole mon ami, you're absolutely right - I just wanted chum BlueLine or another Belgrano inmate to confirm that.
Bit perplexed about your criticism of the IMC Rating - yes, I know that it isn't a full IR but sensibly used within its limitations it's a valuable contribution to flight safety in light aircraft. I'd sooner cruise VMC on top than grope around underneath in the clag 'in sight of the surface'.
Bit perplexed about your criticism of the IMC Rating - yes, I know that it isn't a full IR but sensibly used within its limitations it's a valuable contribution to flight safety in light aircraft. I'd sooner cruise VMC on top than grope around underneath in the clag 'in sight of the surface'.