Artificial Horizon versus Turn Coordinator in very light VFR aircraft.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So.. a question for the experts. If you have an Turn and Slip fitted in lets say a "highly capable" aerobatics plane, will the maneuvering destroy it? I know it sounds like an odd question to ask but I have reasons!
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Away from it all
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Never gave any problem in a PItts - but then it was the 'ball' element that was the most important!
The nature of the motion is more likely to cause long term damage, and may shorten the life of the components a little. Mechanical artificial horizons will "topple" in many aerobatic manoeuvres, although should self-cage within a minute or so of return to straight and level flight.
On the other hand, the more modern solid state electronic systems - I'd expect no problems at all, bar possibly a very short period of nonsense readings in conditions they weren't designed for (say, a spin or flick roll).
G
On the other hand, the more modern solid state electronic systems - I'd expect no problems at all, bar possibly a very short period of nonsense readings in conditions they weren't designed for (say, a spin or flick roll).
G
partial panel in a simulator is much better and safer than in actual IMC.
While he was smugly poling his way around a holding pattern I took the liberty of pulling the CB on the artificial horizon. Within 45 seconds he was in a spiral dive and would have eventually crashed. I thought he would have learned from this highly effective lesson that keeping up one's instrument flying skill on limited panel was just as important as full panel. No so. He got quite angry and blamed me (his instructor) for causing him to crash. It's called Loss of Face; a significant factor among certain cultures and the contributory cause of some accidents.
