PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Artificial Horizon versus Turn Coordinator in very light VFR aircraft.
Old 11th Aug 2018, 13:12
  #24 (permalink)  
Judd
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
partial panel in a simulator is much better and safer than in actual IMC.
In the flying school where I worked years ago a wealthy individual bought a Cirrus. He spent lots of time in a simulator now called a flight training device. Holding patterns and ILS stuff as he intended to fly IFR in his new Cirrus with its autopilot and EFIS. I suggested he should also practice limited panel instrument flying in the simulator just in case it ever happened. He scoffed at the suggestion and said it would never happen with EFIS. Maybe so. Except the simulator didn't have EFIS. Usual six pack which included a Turn and Slip indicator (Bat and Ball).

While he was smugly poling his way around a holding pattern I took the liberty of pulling the CB on the artificial horizon. Within 45 seconds he was in a spiral dive and would have eventually crashed. I thought he would have learned from this highly effective lesson that keeping up one's instrument flying skill on limited panel was just as important as full panel. No so. He got quite angry and blamed me (his instructor) for causing him to crash. It's called Loss of Face; a significant factor among certain cultures and the contributory cause of some accidents.
Judd is offline