Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Engineers & Technicians
Reload this Page >

787 Dreamliner Aerodynamics

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

787 Dreamliner Aerodynamics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th October 2011 | 10:09
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Dublin
787 Dreamliner Aerodynamics

Currently doing an assignment which requires me to look at aerodynamic advances in a 787. I have found that the Boeing website is not very detailed when it comes to the new concepts (They dont want ideas copied etc..). They have included smaller fairings, laminar flow nacellle, flaperons, sweptback wings, raked wing tips. I have also read that they are using a new paint type that also helps with the airflow to reduce drag on nacelles and using HLFC in the tail.
Basically what I am asking is does anyboy have any more information or facts that would be useful ? Thank you in advance
Shauna2693 is offline  
Reply
Old 9th October 2011 | 20:17
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 56
From: Anglia
In my own poor Rigger's opinion, the most aerodynamic change made on the 787 that I can see is the CFR manufacturing system which makes smoother outside surfaces that, in turn helps smoother airflows.

Oh yes...and the nice crinkley bits on the rear of the engine nacelles - to mix hot & cold gasses to reduce noise, apparently.

Hope this helps.
Rigga is offline  
Reply
Old 9th October 2011 | 23:23
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: West Coast
787 design features

Were you at this link? At newairplane.com

Also this link reiterates that any savings/advances are not just through use of composites, but by integrating a number of new advances to enhance efficiency overall. However, there's a good point about the ability to acheive more complex (and efficient) wing shape with the new materials.

Last edited by Starter Crew; 9th October 2011 at 23:27. Reason: added second link reference
Starter Crew is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2011 | 00:18
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,766
Likes: 4
From: Here and there
This Flight global blog has some interesting references regarding the aircraft performance,including reference to a dossier compiled by Airbus about the aircraft.
At long last, a new comment system for FlightBlogger - FlightBlogger - Aviation News, Commentary and Analysis
The prototype was 9500kg overweight!
The Airbus document can be found here:
http://www.planebusiness.com/buzz/airbus2.pdf
tubby linton is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2011 | 19:10
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Dublin
Thank You ! All the info is really helpful
Shauna2693 is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2011 | 20:47
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,130
Likes: 56
From: Anglia
...and buy next week's Flight International - a special on the 787 production history and issues to date
Rigga is offline  
Reply
Old 11th October 2011 | 14:53
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 186
Likes: 1
From: UK
You probably will find that a lot of the 'new' technologies Boeing are marketing with the 787 are not a new concept.

Im sure if you googled many of the design features you will see them on older now out of service aircraft.

Some are a bit before my time but I do remember learning the basic systems in my LWTR studies. I am sure there are plenty of members who can help by posting examples and applications??
Beeline is offline  
Reply
Old 11th October 2011 | 20:56
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Away from home Rat
230v AC systems?? Not many aircraft have IDGs rated to that.. Not many at all!
Alber Ratman is offline  
Reply
Old 11th October 2011 | 21:10
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
From: East of LGB
Interesting on tubby's link to the Airbus presentation, slides within had "Boeing Propriety" clearly marked on them.
11Fan is offline  
Reply
Old 11th October 2011 | 22:36
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Dublin
yeah actually ! when i googled some of the concepts are really old ! and i will defo look out for that magazine ! thanks for the heads up!
Shauna2693 is offline  
Reply
Old 12th October 2011 | 10:31
  #11 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Aviation Qualifications: Non-Aircrew
Posts: 480
Likes: 276
From: Sweden
Often people come up with really clever ideas that just aren't practical at the time. Years later technology has improved and that concept become workable. Happens all the time.
Avionker is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.