Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Engineers & Technicians
Reload this Page >

Working directive for engineers

Wikiposts
Search
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

Working directive for engineers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Aug 2011, 00:25
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,513
Received 203 Likes on 112 Posts
SC

97% refers to that particular employer only. If what I hear through the grapevine is true then they would not have had much choice.

My own circumstances a very different (thank the gods) and as far as I know no one who works where I do has opted out of the WTD.

So please when you refer to stupidity of engineers can you be more specific as one or two of us are getting a bit peeved with your general outburst.

Regards,

T (37.5 hrs/week & no overtime for months)
TURIN is online now  
Old 6th Aug 2011, 10:29
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: LHR
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The figure of 97% is brought up time and time again. 97% is one hell of a huge majority........Think why. Because 97% of engineers are not stupid! By voting to opt out it gives the individual a choice to work long hours or to only work a standard shift. An employer can only ask, not force an employee to work excessive hours. The choice is therefore yours and you have the freedom to make the decision yourself rather than be regulated. Nice position to be in!
spannerhead is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2011, 15:46
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 473
Received 162 Likes on 74 Posts
I actually meant anything constructive to add, not just repeating previous insults.

Now try reading this quote from the original post:-

I'm looking for something that says that you can't be expected to work seven days a week continuously, without any planned days off.
This is what the original post was about. Yet you chose to launch into a vitriolic and unprovoked attack on a large group of people, for some unknown reason.

Now can you, or can you not, answer the question posed by the OP?

If so then please do, if not then kindly shut up. I'm sure I'm not the only one sick of your jaundiced views.

Last edited by Avionker; 6th Aug 2011 at 15:57.
Avionker is online now  
Old 6th Aug 2011, 16:15
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Rest break rules for the UK anyway
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2011, 16:44
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 473
Received 162 Likes on 74 Posts
For the love of god man, read what people are writing, not what you want to read......

Who is complaining about working more than 48 hours a week? No one that I can see...

The OP wanted to know if he could, or should, be expected to work 7 days a week, between 3 and 5 hours a day, on a continuous basis.

That is between 21 and 35 hours a week. The WTD will not prevent him from doing this, so why in the hell are you so fixated on it?
Avionker is online now  
Old 6th Aug 2011, 16:56
  #26 (permalink)  
Thought police antagonist
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
Posts: 1,373
Received 120 Likes on 87 Posts
" Stop pretending you are intelligent, you ain't "

And that comment alone from you would confirm, that, you are indeed a serious flight safety hazard.
Krystal n chips is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2011, 16:56
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 473
Received 162 Likes on 74 Posts
And these UK regs apply to the Op how? I notice he gives his location as the Carribean. Any chance you could reply to this question with out insulting anyone?
Avionker is online now  
Old 6th Aug 2011, 21:02
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hyperspace
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Time to stop feeding the troll me thinks!
boeing_eng is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2011, 21:12
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 3,513
Received 203 Likes on 112 Posts
The figure of 97% is brought up time and time again. 97% is one hell of a huge majority........Think why. Because 97% of engineers are not stupid! By voting to opt out it gives the individual a choice to work long hours or to only work a standard shift. An employer can only ask, not force an employee to work excessive hours. The choice is therefore yours and you have the freedom to make the decision yourself rather than be regulated. Nice position to be in!
I'm going to have to disagree there.

The WTD gives the employee protection from an overbearing employer. Opting out gives the employer carte blanche.

Besides, if you average out 48 hrs over 17 weeks it's quite easy to slip in a few doublers if your normal week is 35 or 40 hrs.


SC, give it a rest eh. We get it. some people are their own worst enemies and will work all the hours they can regardless of their own health/fatigue condition. Yes they are 'stupid' but please do not tar us all with the same brush.
TURIN is online now  
Old 6th Aug 2011, 22:35
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Age: 69
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok Turin I will because I respect the honesty in your last post.

Turin sums it up nicely and I will now drop it.
Safety Concerns is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2011, 08:57
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UK LAE working hours

CAA Paper 2002/06: Work Hours of Aircraft Maintenance Personnel

CAA Paper 2002/06: Work Hours of Aircraft Maintenance Personnel | Publications | CAA

The EC WTD is enacted in the UK through the Working Time Regulations (WTR). The WTR contains an 'opt out' clause. This clause permits a work pattern of more than 48 hours in any one week but only if an average of less than 48hours/week can be achieved over a 17-week period. Working in excess of this is not permitted for any employees, either permanent or contracted staff.

As long as LAE is working within the rule, it is lawful.

To call LAE stupidity is to lower your integrity gaining no respect from any one.
Kuchan is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2011, 11:15
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Age: 69
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
kuchan get your facts right before trying to come across as intelligent.

Example of opt-out agreement
I [name] agree that I may work for more than an average of 48 hours a week. If I change my mind, I will give my employer [amount of time - up to three months] notice in writing to end this agreement.
Signed……....................................
Dated………..................................
The opt out is to enable you to work as much as you wish. That means NO LIMITS on the hours worked.

Last edited by Safety Concerns; 12th Sep 2013 at 20:45.
Safety Concerns is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2011, 11:33
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 473
Received 162 Likes on 74 Posts
What is so hard about disagreeing with someone, without calling them stupid?
Avionker is online now  
Old 7th Aug 2011, 11:41
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a contractor I find it most irritating that there are only 24 hours in each day. Can EASA not do something about this?

...and my timesheet only has space for 7 days per week..
itsresidualmate is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2011, 12:27
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sweden
Posts: 473
Received 162 Likes on 74 Posts
It's easy to let it go. Stop calling people stupid, just because they don't see the world as you do. Accept that people are individuals. Some engineers want hours regulated, some maybe don't. Some people are greedy some are not.

I don't necessarily disagree with everything you say, but I do disagree with your sweeping statements, generalisations and "holier then thou" attitude.

You come on the Engineers and Technicians forum, insult the entire group of people for whom this forum exists, not really the best way to get your point across in my opinion.
Avionker is online now  
Old 7th Aug 2011, 12:33
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Age: 69
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@avionker

I agree with that

@itsresidualmate

I agree with that
Safety Concerns is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2011, 04:42
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 1,980
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SC

Originally Posted by Safety Concerns
kuchan get your facts right before trying to come across as intelligent. The opt out is to enable you to work as much as you wish. That means NO LIMITS on the hours worked.
From this months CHIRP -


The EC WTD is enacted in the UK through the Working Time Regulations (WTR). The WTR contains an 'opt out' clause. This clause permits a work pattern of more than 48 hours in any one week but only if an average of less than 48hours/week can be achieved over a 17-week period. Working in excess of this is not permitted for any employees, either permanent or contracted staff.

Individuals over 18 years of age, who wish to work more than 48 hours a week can choose to opt out of the WTR 48-hour limit; however, this must be voluntary, on an individual basis and in writing unless it has been negotiated as a joint agreement with the whole workforce under the WTR. An individual can cancel the 'opt out' whenever they want, even if it is part of an employment contract, however, the employer must be given advance notice of this intent and depending on the contractual obligation this period will be a minimum of 7 days but could be up to three months.

For individuals who are contracted to work for more than one employer, the total combined hours worked should not exceed the 48-hour average limit.

It should be noted that there are specific provisions in the WTR for night and shift working that also need to be taken into account.

The responsibility for ensuring compliance with the WTR rests with the Health and Safety Executive not the CAA; however, the working pattern described in this report is also contrary to CAA guidance on shift working practices (CAA Paper 2002/06).


As I see that, you can work more than 48 hrs a week, but you cannot opt out of the 17 week average.



Litebulbs is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2011, 11:06
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: EGSS
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I get the distinct feeling Safety Concerns actually works somewhere in Operations
Flightmech is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2011, 14:29
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The responsibility for ensuring compliance with the WTR rests with the Health and Safety Executive not the CAA, but a robust internal quality and safety oversight process must also be considered to be fundamental to CAA.

The CAA Regional Office is responsible for reinforcement of the company management the requirements necessary for the re-issue of an AOC should the company repeatedly ignore any warning.
Kuchan is offline  
Old 18th Aug 2011, 00:12
  #40 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Carry be Anne
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like I've opened up a right can of worms here!

To add a little more light on my query I will give a little more detail of the circumstances I found myself in.

Until quite recently I was an overseas engineer for a UK based charter airline covering turn rounds in the Caribbean. Actually it was the dream job, but as most good things, they do come to an end!

Unfortunately the airline in question has started to reduce it's long haul fleet and operations and I have been made redundant. In the five years I have been out here I have made the Caribbean my home, and for obvious reasons I do not wish to return to the UK.

I was approached by one of my third party customers (German) to come and work for them. Although it was in the same country, it would have meant a relocation to the other side of the island.

They sent me their prospective flying program which was when I noticed that they had planned flights seven days a week. When i queried this they acknowledged this but still expected me to run their operation out here on my own without a day off.

When I asked them when I would get a day off, they said that they would send out a relief engineer when I want to take leave.

This is when I posted my query to see if what this German company is expecting me to do is against any recommendations from any of the authorities. I am aware that my weekly hours would not exceed 48hrs, but what about a day off?
winglit is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.