Aileron Rigging
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aileron Rigging
I am a pilot not an engineer so please allow the intrusion into this forum. I recently saw a Cessna 172 where the ailerons were rigged so that in the level position they appeared to have a slight "droop". I have seen other aircraft where the ailerons appear to have a slight “uplift” but not the other way. Would there be a reason for the droop and how in general terms would you expect to see the rigging of ailerons?
Hope I have made this clear enough.
Hope I have made this clear enough.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wicklow, Ireland
Age: 36
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aileron Rigging
Hey, i will try my best to answer this query for you, I am actually qquite surprised that you have seen aircraft with the ailerons rigged slightly upwards, the normal procedure is to rig them neutral, but occasi9onally some aircraft call for them to be rigged with a 1/2 inch droop from the mainplane, this in my opinion is to created a tad more lift(Big aircraft A330 for instance have hydraulic aileron droop whih allows ailerons to droop a little when neutral to provide more lift!) or it could be to counter-act adverse yaw, or possibly to pick up any slack in the controls, but i dont think i have personally ever seen aan aircraft with ailerons rigged upwards!, Hope this helps!!
Registered User **
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Age: 49
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I now nothing of the bug smashers, The MD-11 has a configurable option for deflected ailerons (droop) to add lift for rwy T/O performance. I believe they deflect at flaps 15 and clean up with the rest of the wing.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: wales
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Aileron Droop
Hi On the A320 the ailerons are deflected downwards when the flaps are extended to follow the wing contour also the droop function also increases lift on the part of the wing which is not equipped by flaps.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: berkshire
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
both ailerons rigged down on the ground, could be that in flight they will be level as the air loads push both ailerons up. due to the cables stretching or backlash being taken up in control runs.
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Nouvion
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mitzy69 is correct , it allows for aileron upfloat due to cable stretch under aero loads . Quite a few cable controlled aircraft , all the way up to some business jets , have this feature !
VK
VK
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know off hand about the 172, but the last ailerons I rigged were on a 182...and they both were rigged down per the mx manual.
I was re-rigging to correct for the previous work done...which had rigged them neutral, with the control yoke nearly 90 degrees to the right. The airplane couldn't turn right in flight. When I inquired with the previous individual, who had done the work, he told me it was fine, and that it just needed a little rudder input...
I was re-rigging to correct for the previous work done...which had rigged them neutral, with the control yoke nearly 90 degrees to the right. The airplane couldn't turn right in flight. When I inquired with the previous individual, who had done the work, he told me it was fine, and that it just needed a little rudder input...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks folks, interesting replies so far especially SNS3Guppy. As a matter of interest I think if my control systems had so much slack as suggested I would ish to have all control linkages checked or am I being over cautious?
I last messed about with them in the mid 80's.
I seem to remember that the whole aileron system wasnt as tight as you'd expect anyway.
Although we'd set them up to the book some owners liked them adjusted down a bit - as is said "adds a bit of lift" - at lower speeds I'd assume. As long as it was recorded in the Log Book this was acceptable (then). Dont know what the rules would say now?
I seem to remember that the whole aileron system wasnt as tight as you'd expect anyway.
Although we'd set them up to the book some owners liked them adjusted down a bit - as is said "adds a bit of lift" - at lower speeds I'd assume. As long as it was recorded in the Log Book this was acceptable (then). Dont know what the rules would say now?
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: U.K
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
iirc C172 ailerons are rigged neutral against the flaps in the up position any aileron droop could be due to a loose carry through cable or just a badly rigged system.
I think the C152 is rigged .5degree droop on the ailerons
I think the C152 is rigged .5degree droop on the ailerons
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 3,218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As a matter of interest I think if my control systems had so much slack as suggested I would ish to have all control linkages checked or am I being over cautious
Taking up "slack" is a lot more than checking linkages. It's checking cables, turnbuckles, pulleys, bellcranks, and particularly cable tensions, as well as overall rigging.
You will notice a certain amount of play in rod ends and other points in the system, which can only be removed by replacing those components. A certain amount of play is acceptable, but not much.
You're not being overly cautious. If you have any concerns at all, you should have it checked over by a qualified mechanic.
Although we'd set them up to the book some owners liked them adjusted down a bit - as is said "adds a bit of lift" - at lower speeds I'd assume. As long as it was recorded in the Log Book this was acceptable (then).
An old mechanic's trick for an airplane out of trim laterally is to rig a flap low to "pick up" the wing. This is really poor practice for addressing the symptoms, and not the problem.
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HP Victor had ailerons rigged up a bit - design related to address fatigue issues.
Quote from the PA-28 Maintenance Manual:
In the event of wing heaviness during flight, the flap on the side of the heavy wing can be adjusted down from neutral to remedy this condition by lengthening the control rod. Check the inspection hole in each rod end to ascertain that there are sufficient threads remaining and a wire cannot be inserted through these holes. Rod ends without check holes, maintain a minimum of .375 of an inch thread engagement. Do not raise the flap of the other wing above neutral.
Glad I dont fly one of them - what were they thinking!
An old mechanic's trick for an airplane out of trim laterally is to rig a flap low to "pick up" the wing. This is really poor practice for addressing the symptoms, and not the problem.
In the event of wing heaviness during flight, the flap on the side of the heavy wing can be adjusted down from neutral to remedy this condition by lengthening the control rod. Check the inspection hole in each rod end to ascertain that there are sufficient threads remaining and a wire cannot be inserted through these holes. Rod ends without check holes, maintain a minimum of .375 of an inch thread engagement. Do not raise the flap of the other wing above neutral.
Glad I dont fly one of them - what were they thinking!
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: on the edge
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...... from the PA-28 Maintenance Manual:
In the event of wing heaviness during flight, the flap on the side of the heavy wing can be adjusted down from neutral to remedy this condition
In the event of wing heaviness during flight, the flap on the side of the heavy wing can be adjusted down from neutral to remedy this condition
This is a common rectification for light aircraft.
Cheers
Blackhand
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is that asymmetrical rigging possible on a C172 with its electrical flaps?
Just curious, a few of the C172:s I fly feel like they definitely prefer right turns over left (or the opposite)...
Just curious, a few of the C172:s I fly feel like they definitely prefer right turns over left (or the opposite)...
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: U.K
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 172+driver
Is that asymmetrical rigging possible on a C172 with its electrical flaps?
Just curious, a few of the C172:s I fly feel like they definitely prefer right turns over left (or the opposite)...
Just curious, a few of the C172:s I fly feel like they definitely prefer right turns over left (or the opposite)...
yes possible by adjustment of the eye ends at the flap and at the flap bellcrank ends
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Nouvion
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes possible by adjustment of the eye ends at the flap and at the flap bellcrank ends
Its been a while for me but............ not legal I think . Definately for the 150/152 and I think also for the 172,182,etc, to correct a wing heavy condition the wing root trailing edge is adjusted up or down via an eccentric bush at the rear spar attachment bolt ! The flaps must stay rigged neutral .
VK
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: U.K
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quote:
yes possible by adjustment of the eye ends at the flap and at the flap bellcrank ends
Its been a while for me but............ not legal I think . Definately for the 150/152 and I think also for the 172,182,etc, to correct a wing heavy condition the wing root trailing edge is adjusted up or down via an eccentric bush at the rear spar attachment bolt ! The flaps must stay rigged neutral .
VK
yes possible by adjustment of the eye ends at the flap and at the flap bellcrank ends
Its been a while for me but............ not legal I think . Definately for the 150/152 and I think also for the 172,182,etc, to correct a wing heavy condition the wing root trailing edge is adjusted up or down via an eccentric bush at the rear spar attachment bolt ! The flaps must stay rigged neutral .
VK
It was asked if it was possible to rig the the flaps asymmetrically not if it was the correct way to cure a heavy wing ;-)
