Piper M600 for CAT under AOC
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Always moving
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Piper M600 for CAT under AOC
Hi there,
As you may know, last year Piper released a new version of the PA-46, the M600 powered by a PT6 engine. Its performance, range and max weight has been improved and it can now carry 5 adult people with baggage to a 1,000NM destination. This aircraft is not considered either as a top performer for private flyers or a very interesting alternative to the TBM o PC-12 for Commercial Air Transport since its acquisition and operating costs are less costly.
Moreover, new EASA rules allow single pilot operations for Singe Engine Turbine aicraft for commercial operations.
What do you think? is this aicraft a game changer? New era for the SET aicraft?
Regards
As you may know, last year Piper released a new version of the PA-46, the M600 powered by a PT6 engine. Its performance, range and max weight has been improved and it can now carry 5 adult people with baggage to a 1,000NM destination. This aircraft is not considered either as a top performer for private flyers or a very interesting alternative to the TBM o PC-12 for Commercial Air Transport since its acquisition and operating costs are less costly.
Moreover, new EASA rules allow single pilot operations for Singe Engine Turbine aicraft for commercial operations.
What do you think? is this aicraft a game changer? New era for the SET aicraft?
Regards
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Somewhere between FAF and DA
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's nothing new, same PT6 as the M500 but with a little more power, sits at a slightly higher price point but still just lower than the TBM.
Updated avionics and some nice features for single pilot safety but it won't pull people who want the speed and range of the TBM or the utility and size of the PC-12.
It's the sort of aircraft for those who want the 911 but only have the money for a Cayman, the smart money waits a little longer and gets the bigger and better model.
Updated avionics and some nice features for single pilot safety but it won't pull people who want the speed and range of the TBM or the utility and size of the PC-12.
It's the sort of aircraft for those who want the 911 but only have the money for a Cayman, the smart money waits a little longer and gets the bigger and better model.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: schermoney and left front seat
Age: 57
Posts: 2,439
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What do you think? is this aicraft a game changer? New era for the SET aicraft?
On the operational side, you still need better weather at least for T/O and I know several "business people" (aka clients) that wouldn't go near a single engine airplane.
I can´t see it being a game changer, but then I´m a pessimist.
Last edited by His dudeness; 4th Aug 2018 at 22:44.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ormond Beach
Age: 49
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree, it won't change any games, but that's not to say it doesn't have its place. For one thing, it's priced not "just lower" than a TBM, more like 30% lower. I don't think it's meant to compete with the PC-12 at all, that's a very different aircraft.
Last edited by flyboyike; 1st Aug 2018 at 18:47.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: schermoney and left front seat
Age: 57
Posts: 2,439
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: manchester
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the USA the aircraft is limited to the likes of private owner pilot moving up from a piston single or twin. It has very limited space and it is very difficult and uncomfortable to climb into the two front seats.
Buy a new one and brace yourself for the depreciation once you first fly away after taking delivery. If you were really considering a single engine turbine for CAT you would buy an aircraft built for the job and that had some realistic residual value.
It is hardly used anywhere else in the world where CAT SE IFR has been legal for some time, so why would that change in EASA land ?
If your serious buy a second hand PC12, if your sensible and serious buy an older Kingair.
It is an expensive toy.
Buy a new one and brace yourself for the depreciation once you first fly away after taking delivery. If you were really considering a single engine turbine for CAT you would buy an aircraft built for the job and that had some realistic residual value.
It is hardly used anywhere else in the world where CAT SE IFR has been legal for some time, so why would that change in EASA land ?
If your serious buy a second hand PC12, if your sensible and serious buy an older Kingair.
It is an expensive toy.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Always moving
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was just considering that even though the acquisition costs are higher than a used PC12 or TBM, the maintenance costs and operating costs are less expensive.
Moreover, this aircraft won’t replace other SET out there, but I am just suggesting that it can be effect for some specific missions (e.g. 5pax 800-1000nm) and for this particular missions, it would be very competitive.
It’s is obvious that if you take the 100% of the current private flights, this aircraft will only be suitable for maybe 15-20% of them (there is a HUGE number of private charters for 2-3 people for less than a 1000nm trip in Europe). What is even more interesting is that there a certain percentage of the population that is not currently using a private charter because it is very expensive but with these new SET, this service will become less expensive so a new market will emerge. Compare a PC12 hourly rate to these new SET. Half of crew expense, 75% of the operating cost of a bigger SET. For me, it will be accessible to a big number of companies/people.
Let me state that I am not related with Piper or any other builder in any way.
Regards
Moreover, this aircraft won’t replace other SET out there, but I am just suggesting that it can be effect for some specific missions (e.g. 5pax 800-1000nm) and for this particular missions, it would be very competitive.
It’s is obvious that if you take the 100% of the current private flights, this aircraft will only be suitable for maybe 15-20% of them (there is a HUGE number of private charters for 2-3 people for less than a 1000nm trip in Europe). What is even more interesting is that there a certain percentage of the population that is not currently using a private charter because it is very expensive but with these new SET, this service will become less expensive so a new market will emerge. Compare a PC12 hourly rate to these new SET. Half of crew expense, 75% of the operating cost of a bigger SET. For me, it will be accessible to a big number of companies/people.
Let me state that I am not related with Piper or any other builder in any way.
Regards
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: schermoney and left front seat
Age: 57
Posts: 2,439
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was just considering that even though the acquisition costs are higher than a used PC12 or TBM, the maintenance costs and operating costs are less expensive.
Moreover, this aircraft won’t replace other SET out there, but I am just suggesting that it can be effect for some specific missions (e.g. 5pax 800-1000nm) and for this particular missions, it would be very competitive.
It’s is obvious that if you take the 100% of the current private flights, this aircraft will only be suitable for maybe 15-20% of them (there is a HUGE number of private charters for 2-3 people for less than a 1000nm trip in Europe). What is even more interesting is that there a certain percentage of the population that is not currently using a private charter because it is very expensive but with these new SET, this service will become less expensive so a new market will emerge. Compare a PC12 hourly rate to these new SET. Half of crew expense, 75% of the operating cost of a bigger SET. For me, it will be accessible to a big number of companies/people.
Let me state that I am not related with Piper or any other builder in any way.
Regards
Moreover, this aircraft won’t replace other SET out there, but I am just suggesting that it can be effect for some specific missions (e.g. 5pax 800-1000nm) and for this particular missions, it would be very competitive.
It’s is obvious that if you take the 100% of the current private flights, this aircraft will only be suitable for maybe 15-20% of them (there is a HUGE number of private charters for 2-3 people for less than a 1000nm trip in Europe). What is even more interesting is that there a certain percentage of the population that is not currently using a private charter because it is very expensive but with these new SET, this service will become less expensive so a new market will emerge. Compare a PC12 hourly rate to these new SET. Half of crew expense, 75% of the operating cost of a bigger SET. For me, it will be accessible to a big number of companies/people.
Let me state that I am not related with Piper or any other builder in any way.
Regards
Lets wait and see. I remember 10 years ago the VLJ wave was to open new markets etcetc., now did they ? If you look at the amount of money you bind with an aircraft purchase, the truth really is you can make way more money out of the same investment elsewhere. Given this, who are the investors ?
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Near Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Hello!
Why would that be? Do Piper pilots get paid only 1/2 of Pilatus pilots? And if you refer to single pilot operations then a PC12 can be operated single pilot just like any Piper Malibu. Keep in mind however that single pilot commercial operations are severely constrained by duty timy limitations. 10 hours is the maximum duty time for single pilot, as opposed to 14 hours, extendable to 18 through split duty, for multi crew. A typical day return mission (which is about 80% of what I have been doing in the last 30 years or so) can not be accomplished within a 10 hour duty period, especially not with a slow-ish plane. This is why the second pilot in typical narrow-track operations is generally known as the "flight time extender"...
Anyway, right now the whole concept will not work in these days because there are no pilots on the market. Even airlines are struggling to keep their planes in the air, some (like Eurowings) now offer "welcome gifts" (=20.000 Euro cash bonus) to attract pilots, others (e.g. Helvetic) have raised their maximum age for direct entry pilots beyond 60. I have been in this business for quite some time but have never seen anything like this before. Our operation (bizjets) will soon be left with a single first officer, all others have left for the airlines during the last half year. And the last one remaining is sending out apllications... I now spend plenty of time on the phone with ex-colleagues trying to lure them back into the cockpit because they went back to their pre-flying jobs during the quiet years.
In that situation, where do you think you will find crews for a low-end cheap single-pilot single-engine deathtrap operation?
Why would that be? Do Piper pilots get paid only 1/2 of Pilatus pilots? And if you refer to single pilot operations then a PC12 can be operated single pilot just like any Piper Malibu. Keep in mind however that single pilot commercial operations are severely constrained by duty timy limitations. 10 hours is the maximum duty time for single pilot, as opposed to 14 hours, extendable to 18 through split duty, for multi crew. A typical day return mission (which is about 80% of what I have been doing in the last 30 years or so) can not be accomplished within a 10 hour duty period, especially not with a slow-ish plane. This is why the second pilot in typical narrow-track operations is generally known as the "flight time extender"...
Anyway, right now the whole concept will not work in these days because there are no pilots on the market. Even airlines are struggling to keep their planes in the air, some (like Eurowings) now offer "welcome gifts" (=20.000 Euro cash bonus) to attract pilots, others (e.g. Helvetic) have raised their maximum age for direct entry pilots beyond 60. I have been in this business for quite some time but have never seen anything like this before. Our operation (bizjets) will soon be left with a single first officer, all others have left for the airlines during the last half year. And the last one remaining is sending out apllications... I now spend plenty of time on the phone with ex-colleagues trying to lure them back into the cockpit because they went back to their pre-flying jobs during the quiet years.
In that situation, where do you think you will find crews for a low-end cheap single-pilot single-engine deathtrap operation?
Last edited by what next; 3rd Aug 2018 at 10:53.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ormond Beach
Age: 49
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not really, and for a rather obvious reason. 800-1000nm in that airplane is 3.5-4.5 hours. Not many people have that big a bladder, if you know what I mean.
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Markos
I think you might check your numbers ref the viability of 5 pax to 1000nm in this. Piper's own data claims 1200nm at fast cruise 274 kts, so let's say in the real world that's 1000nm at 260kts. With a tanks full payload of about 300kg that's 2 pax, not your 5. And where does the 5th sit anyway - P2 seat? Really? And as flyboymike says, bladder factor is key too. IF you can get 5 pax 1000nm it will likely be at 180kts long range cruise - 5.5 hrs. I reckon 2 hours max with no toilet is realistic for charter. So you've got a 500nm realistic range for charter with this I reckon.
Moving on to costs, it's the old chestnut I'm afraid - plane DOC's can be dwarfed by crew, crew expenses, landing, handling, airspace route charges, flight planning and AOC charges etc, as Dudeness implies. . Add slow speed, (it does matter), a single engine, a prop and fairly cramped cabin and I see this having no impact on charter I'm afraid. It's a nice family/small owner-driver biz aircraft.
Why your interest in it and enthusiasm ref AOC work?
I think you might check your numbers ref the viability of 5 pax to 1000nm in this. Piper's own data claims 1200nm at fast cruise 274 kts, so let's say in the real world that's 1000nm at 260kts. With a tanks full payload of about 300kg that's 2 pax, not your 5. And where does the 5th sit anyway - P2 seat? Really? And as flyboymike says, bladder factor is key too. IF you can get 5 pax 1000nm it will likely be at 180kts long range cruise - 5.5 hrs. I reckon 2 hours max with no toilet is realistic for charter. So you've got a 500nm realistic range for charter with this I reckon.
Moving on to costs, it's the old chestnut I'm afraid - plane DOC's can be dwarfed by crew, crew expenses, landing, handling, airspace route charges, flight planning and AOC charges etc, as Dudeness implies. . Add slow speed, (it does matter), a single engine, a prop and fairly cramped cabin and I see this having no impact on charter I'm afraid. It's a nice family/small owner-driver biz aircraft.
Why your interest in it and enthusiasm ref AOC work?
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: France
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nowadays I imagine he wouldn't fly anything smaller than a Cessna Latitude.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: schermoney and left front seat
Age: 57
Posts: 2,439
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The times, they are changing....
