Multiflight LBA Orders BBJ!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mr David Hood/Pace Computers latest purchase...although I understand there having a few problems approving the interior spec with the CAA, includes:
Full seating for...28!!
Bedroom
Shower-room
Dining room....
007
------------------
Hear All...See All...Say Now't.
[email protected]
(I'm away for a while!)
Full seating for...28!!
Bedroom
Shower-room
Dining room....
007
------------------
Hear All...See All...Say Now't.
[email protected]
(I'm away for a while!)
Guest
Posts: n/a
Mutt,
Why do you have such a problem with these type of aircraft staying off the G- register??
But to clear it up as my brother's wife's family own multiflight, the BBJ will be going on the G- register when it arrives.
------------------
Better to be up there wishing you were down here than be down here wishing you were up there!
Why do you have such a problem with these type of aircraft staying off the G- register??
But to clear it up as my brother's wife's family own multiflight, the BBJ will be going on the G- register when it arrives.
------------------
Better to be up there wishing you were down here than be down here wishing you were up there!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Deek01,
If the aircraft is going to be used for Hire and Reward, then i totally agree with you that it should be UK registered.
If it is going to be a Companies Executive transport, I would have thought that a Caymen type register would offer better tax breaks and cheaper operating costs.
Isn't this the reason that Ford registered their aircraft in the Caribbean?
I also dont know of any JAR registered BBJ's, so i therefore find it interesting that this is the first company to go that route.
Mutt.
[This message has been edited by mutt (edited 17 March 2001).]
If the aircraft is going to be used for Hire and Reward, then i totally agree with you that it should be UK registered.
If it is going to be a Companies Executive transport, I would have thought that a Caymen type register would offer better tax breaks and cheaper operating costs.
Isn't this the reason that Ford registered their aircraft in the Caribbean?
I also dont know of any JAR registered BBJ's, so i therefore find it interesting that this is the first company to go that route.
Mutt.

[This message has been edited by mutt (edited 17 March 2001).]
Guest
Posts: n/a
26.2 is spot on.
At Ford we put our 2 BBJ's and our G IV on the Bermuda reg to escape the onerous costs,bureaucracy and delays of the CAA system. Prior to the BBJ's we had 2 MD-87's on the Bermuda reg as well because the CAA would not accept it as part of the MD-80 series and wanted full initial type certification at an un-imaginable cost.

------------------
'Keep the Stress Down'
At Ford we put our 2 BBJ's and our G IV on the Bermuda reg to escape the onerous costs,bureaucracy and delays of the CAA system. Prior to the BBJ's we had 2 MD-87's on the Bermuda reg as well because the CAA would not accept it as part of the MD-80 series and wanted full initial type certification at an un-imaginable cost.

------------------
'Keep the Stress Down'





