Wikiposts
Search
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

Old Smokers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Mar 2013, 09:51
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK, sometimes USA
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old Smokers

I thought I'd start a thread to show photos of early 'smoking' jet airliners. Does anyone have any others they could share?

Spantax CV990 Coronado departing runway 08 Hurn Airport, UK.


Last edited by airsmiles; 4th Mar 2013 at 13:26.
airsmiles is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 10:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: In a nest
Age: 32
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
marianoberna is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 12:55
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cumbria
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spantax Coronado?

Edit to add

DANG! just found that you told us about this in the "Lulsgate Cowboy" thread

But honest, I guessed the picture before reading the answer...

Last edited by G&T ice n slice; 4th Mar 2013 at 12:58.
G&T ice n slice is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 13:02
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: OO-KAY
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fantastic! Plenty of shots of smoking CV990s knocking around the www.
1970s Spotter is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 13:27
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK, sometimes USA
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
G&T / I&C

My fault - should have made it clearer. Now edited original post.
airsmiles is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 16:21
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dorset UK
Age: 70
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
I twice saw Spantax CV990s take off from runway 17 at Hurn about 1972 or 73. 4800 ft or there abouts. Very strong southerly wind but still a bit scary.

Normally after departure you could see the smoke trail for miles as they headed South if the sky was clear.
dixi188 is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 16:36
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,831
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
I saw one do that too. I was sitting in the rest room of the College of ATC reading a paper when there was this sudden almighty noise as the Coronado climbed out; as the rest room faces sorry faced south it was shielded from the noise prior to this.
chevvron is offline  
Old 4th Mar 2013, 20:07
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: CYZV
Age: 77
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I42 I was looking for that one!

There's a YouTube vid out there - that I can't find - that shows a whole group of pre fan-equipped B-52's taking off, one behind the other. By the time the fourth guy is rolling, he's solid IFR in smoke. Can't remember the base, it may have been Plattsburgh, if so they would have been able to see the smoke from Montreal.
pigboat is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2013, 02:32
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Black Diamond AB (CEH2)
Posts: 6,648
Received 75 Likes on 46 Posts
pigboat,

I know roughly where that LAX photo was taken from, and I think the Captain was saying "Raise the gear to clear the fence!"

This may not be the video you remember, but it is pretty good - from the movie "A Gathering of Eagles" (Rock Hudson 1963):



Incidentally, can anyone tell me why water-injections caused so much extra smoke?

Last edited by India Four Two; 5th Mar 2013 at 02:35.
India Four Two is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2013, 09:14
  #10 (permalink)  
Death Cruiser Flight Crew
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Vaucluse, France.
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spantax had some modifications done to the burner cans of the Coronado's CJ805-23B engines, resulting in a significant - but not total - reduction in smoke.

Sometime in the early 1960s I was a passenger on a Swissair Coronado - HB-ICE - going Lagos to Geneva non-stop. My previous experience of takeoffs at LOS had been on BOAC Boeing 707s via Kano, so I was aware that this takeoff was going to be somewhat more lengthy. Cor, I'll say so! It went on for ever until we rotated ... and then not a lot seemed to happen, except palm trees started whipping past the wingtips. Eventually, positive rate of climb was established, and we were on our way.

In a Shell Aviation magazine of the time, the Swissair Coronado fleet captain described it as "A rather 'hot' aeroplane, challenging in some of its handling aspects, but very rewarding to fly." He was answering the query about the need for nosewheel braking.

Last edited by Georgeablelovehowindia; 5th Mar 2013 at 19:27. Reason: Remembered the Coronado's reg
Georgeablelovehowindia is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2013, 10:48
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK, sometimes USA
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Geez, they got the gear coming up quick enough on the AA 707, didn't they?
Presumably they had a desperate need for less drag to climb away!
airsmiles is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2013, 16:21
  #12 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,166
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Geez, they got the gear coming up quick enough on the AA 707, didn't they?
it was the action of Gear Up - that produced the Positive Rate of Climb.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2013, 16:56
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Blighty (Nth. Downs)
Age: 77
Posts: 2,107
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Quote:
"Geez, they got the gear coming up quick enough on the AA 707, didn't they?"

Which video was that?
Chris Scott is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2013, 17:17
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Beyond the Blue Horizon
Age: 63
Posts: 1,257
Received 171 Likes on 106 Posts
Paxboy
I think there are a few pilots around who would say the same thing re some A340 models. One comment I have heard was take off was achieved at a hot and high airport due to the curviture of the earth !
Mr Mac is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2013, 18:13
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
If you are going tp do a smoky take off; do it propely.

Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2013, 19:21
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: CYZV
Age: 77
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I42 that looks like it.

Normal after takeoff checklist protocol usually goes like this:

Pilot Not Flying ... Positive Rate
Pilot Flying.......... Gear Up

I'll bet the PNF called the whole thing - Positiverategearup - in a squeaky voice.
pigboat is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2013, 20:10
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Scotland
Age: 79
Posts: 807
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chris Scott,
I think he was referring to the second photo in the thread!
broadreach is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2013, 10:11
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Blighty (Nth. Downs)
Age: 77
Posts: 2,107
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Thanks Broadreach. Considering I did my own 707 base-training with AA at DFW, I was a bit slow on that one! But, by then, the JT3D (turbofans) were producing a lot less smoke than the stove-pipes in that photo.

Quote from PAXboy:
"...it was the action of Gear Up - that produced the Positive Rate of Climb."

On a more serious note, that's unlikely. The opening of the gear doors adds so much drag that - as a general rule - it will take even longer to reach screen height, because maintaining V2 (or whatever) will require a lower pitch angle. So selecting the gear up is not going to get you over the perimeter wall: the benefit will be delayed until retraction is almost completed.

By the way, even the 707-320C (with the turbofans) could struggle out of LAX on a hot day at MTOW. Passing Vr, you couldn't afford to rotate too enthusiastically (as I once did) or the a/c could sit on the runway.
Chris Scott is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2013, 11:16
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,672
Likes: 0
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts
American, along with Pan Am and Qantas, converted their original 707-120 (and American their early 720-020) aircraft to fan engines very quickly indeed, some of the later 1960 build were changed over after less than one year of operation. I presume Pratt & Whitney offered some sort of trade-in for this. TWA didn't bother, and stuck with theirs until well into the 1970s - in fact they later picked up some secondhand straight-pipe ones.

The early intercontinental 707s couldn't be converted to fan engines as they had more significant airframe differences, so everybody was stuck with those.

The B47 above is reminiscent of an Airspeed Ambassador (Centaurus sleeve-valve piston engines) on cold engine start after standing for a couple of days .......

Last edited by WHBM; 6th Mar 2013 at 11:21.
WHBM is online now  
Old 6th Mar 2013, 12:32
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cornwall UK
Age: 79
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
None of the airlines converted their 707-320 'Intercintinental' models to fans but decades later the Israeli Air Force converted 2 ex-Sabena -329s('128' and '140') to JT-3D fans (they were perhaps already tankers?)

Photo Search Results | Airliners.net
A30yoyo is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.