Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

Challenge

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd January 2015 | 06:53
  #4801 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 0
From: East Anglia
Good question, I had to go digging. The answer is yes
Kitbag is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2015 | 11:28
  #4802 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 266
Likes: 8
From: Central Scotland
PZL P VI ?
Zaxis is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2015 | 11:35
  #4803 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 0
From: East Anglia
No, not a Polish kite.
Kitbag is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2015 | 18:50
  #4804 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 266
Likes: 8
From: Central Scotland
Do you realise just how many different aircraft types were powered by the Jupiter? So where do I start...
If it's not Polish then is it east European?
Zaxis is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2015 | 20:20
  #4805 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 0
From: East Anglia
120+ according to Wiki, most of which were biplanes, the subject is a parasol monoplane though.
Kitbag is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2015 | 21:29
  #4806 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Timbukthree
Tupolev ANT-5 (I-4) ?
evansb is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2015 | 07:00
  #4807 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 0
From: East Anglia
Evansbe has it. The ANT-5/I-4bis, these ac went through the panoply of biplane, sesquiplane and parasol configuration, each time changing the cowling design of the license built Jupiter engine.



evansbe has control
Kitbag is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2015 | 17:24
  #4808 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Timbukthree
Thank you. Here is the next one:
evansb is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2015 | 17:51
  #4809 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 266
Likes: 8
From: Central Scotland
Northrop YB35.... pushing?
Zaxis is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2015 | 17:55
  #4810 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Timbukthree
Sorry, not a Northrop pusher.
evansb is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2015 | 19:15
  #4811 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 0
From: East Anglia
Boeing XB-38?
Kitbag is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2015 | 19:35
  #4812 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Timbukthree
Sorry, not a Boeing product.
evansb is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2015 | 20:28
  #4813 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 0
From: East Anglia
How about this; the ANT-20?

Kitbag is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2015 | 20:41
  #4814 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Timbukthree
Kitbag is correct. The "Maxsim Gorky". Only two were built. The first version had eight engines. The one in the photo is the second aircraft, with six, but more powerful
engines. Your turn.

Last edited by evansb; 24th January 2015 at 21:07.
evansb is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2015 | 20:58
  #4815 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 0
From: East Anglia
TVM, try this as a quicky

Kitbag is offline  
Reply
Old 26th January 2015 | 19:58
  #4816 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: With Wonko, outside the Asylum.
If that's a quicky, I'd hate for you to post a slow-burner...

We seem to see a fuselage with a flush window and an emergency exit, suggesting a cabin aircraft which is pressurised. There is a subsonic inlet at a very odd angle, which offers the suggestion that it's not a turbojet but something with propellers, and maybe a pusher installation in the style of the Avanti. The whole image is a bit blurry - is it an engineering mockup or airshow example? There is a mismatch between the 'faired' elements of high-ish speed design and the enormous offset of the components.


Are we looking at a reflection? The image doesn't seem to show that there was a clear light source. Is it one aircraft? Is the round thing on the 'intake' a badge or logo (implying that it's not the underside or top etc)?
TheiC is offline  
Reply
Old 26th January 2015 | 21:18
  #4817 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: With Wonko, outside the Asylum.
OK, not an exit, it's the reflection of the engine intake thing...

...by the same token, possibly/probably not a window.

But modern, plastic or composite perhaps... No idea of scale, come to think of it, if that's not a window. I'm wondering whether the thing that looks like a PT6-size intake is a lot smaller.

...and there's no ice protection. Hmmm. Am I making a giant fool of myself here? Anyone else want to play?

Last edited by TheiC; 26th January 2015 at 21:30.
TheiC is offline  
Reply
Old 27th January 2015 | 01:04
  #4818 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: at my computer
If it is an air intake it seems to be at a strange angle to the fuselage.
However, the round window makes me think it may be one of Rutan's creations, and that means anything is possible!
Terry Dactil is offline  
Reply
Old 27th January 2015 | 02:34
  #4819 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 10,283
Likes: 26
From: New South Wales
If it is an air intake it seems to be at a strange angle to the fuselage.
Ditto that.

Noyade is offline  
Reply
Old 27th January 2015 | 02:38
  #4820 (permalink)  
Hippopotomonstrosesquipidelian title
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,825
Likes: 1
From: is everything
Is that the V-Jet II, built by Scaled Composites as a test-bed for Williams' cruise missile engine? (I may be making the last bit up)
Bushfiva is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.