Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Aviation History and Nostalgia Whether working in aviation, retired, wannabee or just plain fascinated this forum welcomes all with a love of flight.

Challenge

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th January 2015 | 21:06
  #4741 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 0
From: East Anglia
Standard engine for the machine, but note there was a very limited number (less than 5) constructed before development stopped.
Kitbag is offline  
Reply
Old 13th January 2015 | 02:39
  #4742 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Timbukthree
Perhaps it is the elegant high-performance Mitsubishi Ki-83?
evansb is offline  
Reply
Old 13th January 2015 | 05:48
  #4743 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 0
From: East Anglia
evansbe has it, it is the Mitsubishi Ki-83, which was so secret that the Allies didn't know about it until after the surrender, hence no familiar reporting name.

evansbe has control

Last edited by Kitbag; 13th January 2015 at 05:50. Reason: Add chain link interwebby thing
Kitbag is offline  
Reply
Old 14th January 2015 | 03:38
  #4744 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Timbukthree
Funny that, to quote Jenkins' post, (now deleted), .. "30 years later they produced a more useful twin engined aircraft". Indeed, as Mitsubishi produced the T-2 and F-2 twin engine jets, both very utile twin engined aircraft. Let us also not forget the MU-2, which was assembled in San Angelo, Texas, in the mid-1970s.

Here is another challenge:
evansb is offline  
Reply
Old 14th January 2015 | 04:03
  #4745 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: at my computer
Looks like a RR Dart mounted over a low wing so I'm thinking HS748. However, the marking on the emergency exit makes me go for the Japanese look-alike.
NAMC YS-11?
Terry Dactil is offline  
Reply
Old 14th January 2015 | 04:31
  #4746 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Timbukthree
Correct! The NAMC YS-11. Speed and range were similar to the HS 748, but the YS-11 had a greater payload capacity, thus a lower operating cost.

YOUR TURN.

Last edited by evansb; 14th January 2015 at 05:08.
evansb is offline  
Reply
Old 14th January 2015 | 05:20
  #4747 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: at my computer
OK. Here is a bigger engine and enough easy clues to work out to what aircraft it is attached.

Terry Dactil is offline  
Reply
Old 14th January 2015 | 19:34
  #4748 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,396
Likes: 3
From: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Wild guess, Convair 880?
con-pilot is offline  
Reply
Old 14th January 2015 | 20:34
  #4749 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: at my computer
Not a Convair.
This is back in the 1960's. We were adjusting the fuel control unit with the engine running. That is why the fan is set in reverse but the hot end isn't.
Reduces the breeze a bit.
Terry Dactil is offline  
Reply
Old 14th January 2015 | 20:45
  #4750 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 0
From: East Anglia
Pratt & Whitney JT3 on a B707?
Kitbag is offline  
Reply
Old 14th January 2015 | 21:02
  #4751 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: at my computer
That's the one.
JT3-MC6 engine on a Qantas B707.
Over to you.
Terry Dactil is offline  
Reply
Old 14th January 2015 | 21:11
  #4752 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 0
From: East Anglia
Thanks Terry, only got there because I misidentified P&Ws logo on the cowling.

Try this bit of heavy metal:

Kitbag is offline  
Reply
Old 14th January 2015 | 21:16
  #4753 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 341
Likes: 4
From: Bedford
It's a large US helicopter but I can't remember it's tribal name!j
oncemorealoft is offline  
Reply
Old 14th January 2015 | 21:22
  #4754 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 0
From: East Anglia
It's a large US helicopter but I can't remember it's tribal name!j
LOL, like it, I may try that ploy in the future!

Whoever can come up with the name, company or mil designation gets the kudos.
Kitbag is offline  
Reply
Old 14th January 2015 | 21:42
  #4755 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 1
From: Florida
That's the one.
JT3-MC6 engine on a Qantas B707.
Over to you.
So why isn't it a JT3D engine instead?
lomapaseo is offline  
Reply
Old 14th January 2015 | 21:51
  #4756 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 266
Likes: 8
From: Central Scotland
Sikorsky S56. / CH37 Mojave
Zaxis is offline  
Reply
Old 14th January 2015 | 22:17
  #4757 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 0
From: East Anglia
Zaxis has it

YHC & goodnight
Kitbag is offline  
Reply
Old 14th January 2015 | 22:28
  #4758 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: at my computer
Ooops!
So why isn't it a JT3D engine instead?
You are right. It is a JT3D-MC6
I was feeling pleased that I could remember the last bit, as it is over 50 years ago!
It was the latest and greatest way back then, and my group held the record for the fastest engine change.
Terry Dactil is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2015 | 18:51
  #4759 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 266
Likes: 8
From: Central Scotland
Try this...
Zaxis is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2015 | 20:30
  #4760 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,871
Likes: 0
From: East Anglia
Lycoming R680?
Kitbag is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.