Victor cockpit visibility?
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep, you are a 
What was wrong with the Victor? Short answer - low level ops after Gary Powers, Vulcan won on fatigue life.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Out East
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Style!
Forget.
VMT for the vid. Loved the chap in the sharp suit and cloth headset (it appeared) heading towards the Vulcan Mk1. Ahhhhhh, that was style! I do hope he was the captain. (I realise he was most probably the test pilot, but still smoothly attired).
Pip pip ON
VMT for the vid. Loved the chap in the sharp suit and cloth headset (it appeared) heading towards the Vulcan Mk1. Ahhhhhh, that was style! I do hope he was the captain. (I realise he was most probably the test pilot, but still smoothly attired).
Pip pip ON
Old Ned
I believe the chap in the suit was probably Roly Falk, who I believe was the Avro Chief test pilot.
I think he was also the pilot who rolled the Vulcan over the Avro factory at the end of a test flight. Footage does exist somewhere, and what a sight it is!
Treble one
I think he was also the pilot who rolled the Vulcan over the Avro factory at the end of a test flight. Footage does exist somewhere, and what a sight it is!
Treble one
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Can someone elucidate as to why Vulcan carried on so long and Victor didn't? The discussion passed me by at the time. What was wrong with Victor?"
I'm not an expert by any means, but according to Vulcan 607, it was the change from high attitude to low attitude to avoid Soviet air defences. This placed more strain on the airframes, chiefly the wings, and reduced their service lives. The Valiant was the most severly affected apparently, followed by the Victor and then the Vulcan (the rigid wing supposedly coped better). Hence the Valiant was retired pretty quickly and the Victors were converted to tankers, leaving the Vulcans.
I'm sure someone who actually has first hand knowledge will be able to provide a better answer though.
I'm not an expert by any means, but according to Vulcan 607, it was the change from high attitude to low attitude to avoid Soviet air defences. This placed more strain on the airframes, chiefly the wings, and reduced their service lives. The Valiant was the most severly affected apparently, followed by the Victor and then the Vulcan (the rigid wing supposedly coped better). Hence the Valiant was retired pretty quickly and the Victors were converted to tankers, leaving the Vulcans.
I'm sure someone who actually has first hand knowledge will be able to provide a better answer though.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Eagle402. Thanks for the link. It also pointed to http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=17GfXQ...eature=related , one of the prototypes being rolled off the top of a loop. From that angle and that lighting, I can't identify the narrator.
Sorry (slightly) for contributing to the natural drift away from Sir Fred's creation.
Sorry (slightly) for contributing to the natural drift away from Sir Fred's creation.
Chief Bottle Washer
Even more :
Victor @ 3:37, scrambling with the tow bar attached?
I know it's just set up for the film, but........
Victor @ 4:30, is that the tail fin of a Lancaster in the right of frame? What an indication of the speed of aviation advances in those years
GBZ: Roly Falk?
: Victor @ 3:37, scrambling with the tow bar attached?
I know it's just set up for the film, but........Victor @ 4:30, is that the tail fin of a Lancaster in the right of frame? What an indication of the speed of aviation advances in those years
GBZ: Roly Falk?
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Senior Pilot
GBZ: Roly Falk?
The fin may well be a Lincoln.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Out East
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Treble One & Eagle 402
Many thanks for the Roly Falk gen and the Vulcan clip. Have found another with the commentary by the irreplaceable Raymond Baxter (BoB Spitfire pilot);
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=in4Pmp84BWM
Don't think the roll was at Farnborough though. Gosh, I would love to have shaken the hands of both these great men.
Pip pip ON
Many thanks for the Roly Falk gen and the Vulcan clip. Have found another with the commentary by the irreplaceable Raymond Baxter (BoB Spitfire pilot);
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=in4Pmp84BWM
Don't think the roll was at Farnborough though. Gosh, I would love to have shaken the hands of both these great men.
Pip pip ON
I do remember, however, an OCU conversion sortie which involved a high speed run in a Mk 1 without the use of the Mach Strut. Somewhere up at 45000 ft or above we began a shallow dive. At about M0.95, and with the aircraft pitching down furiously, my instructor said - "look out." Fresh from training, I did! Not that there was much to see (see earlier posts) - by which time we were very close to, or had actually exceeded M1.0!
View.....
The view out for the AEO and Nav (post combining Radar and Plotter into 1 job) was strictly limited, being through 1 rather small porthole each. As the disbandment of 55 approached I was on a crew that took one of our last airframes to Manston for the Fire School to play with. Manston approach gave us the "Dover tour" clockwise round the coast from the Thames to the Sussex border. Having viewed the tour through said porthole I heard the AEO complain that all he'd seen was sea 
The obliging Approach Controller then gave us the tour backwards to redress the AEO's deprivation!
The obliging Approach Controller then gave us the tour backwards to redress the AEO's deprivation!
Narrator
Guys,
I don't know the name of the Narrator on the clip so kindly provided by Eagle, but the clip comes from a Vulcan DVD I bought my Dad for his birthday one year. The narrator was a someone who worked on the assembly line at the Avro factory, and helped build the aircraft in question.
When Roly Falk rolled the Vulcan, he managed to smash most of the windows in the factory roof......
I don't know the name of the Narrator on the clip so kindly provided by Eagle, but the clip comes from a Vulcan DVD I bought my Dad for his birthday one year. The narrator was a someone who worked on the assembly line at the Avro factory, and helped build the aircraft in question.
When Roly Falk rolled the Vulcan, he managed to smash most of the windows in the factory roof......
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: london
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
el:#21: Can someone elucidate as to why Vulcan carried on so long and Victor didn't? What was wrong with Victor? Nothing. In 1959 both Marks 2 were underway, equally esteemed. Fatigue was not a design, or Spec. issue - high/far was wanted. 'Twas all to do with Skybolt and devious HSAL.
“few (contracts caused) such bitter feelings (as Blue Steel) even in ’56 (Avro puffed 1,000n.m. for later BS.Marks. MoS felt that if they) could not perfect (100n.m.) how could they (do) 10xthat? (Weapons Research Divn, many ex-RAE staff) weak management structure (criticisms) recriminations (were) common parlance” RAF Deterrent Official History, H.Wynn,P202/4. In despair, in January,59 UK joined a USAF Reqt., won June by Douglas (to be) AGM-48 Skybolt ALBM. UK appointed Avro as Sister Firm responsible for integration with RAF's 2 platforms. They said it would not fit under low Victor wings. Sir Fred HP said he would sort that, but he had been deemed "difficult" by MoS, as they juggled the "measure of coalescence" that became HSAL+BAC. Avro gave MoS the excuse needed to leave HP out in the cold. 3rd. Victor B.Mk.2 squadron was abandoned (became SR.2), first 2 to be confined to Blue Steel; all 72 Skybolt platforms to be Vulcan B.2.
“few (contracts caused) such bitter feelings (as Blue Steel) even in ’56 (Avro puffed 1,000n.m. for later BS.Marks. MoS felt that if they) could not perfect (100n.m.) how could they (do) 10xthat? (Weapons Research Divn, many ex-RAE staff) weak management structure (criticisms) recriminations (were) common parlance” RAF Deterrent Official History, H.Wynn,P202/4. In despair, in January,59 UK joined a USAF Reqt., won June by Douglas (to be) AGM-48 Skybolt ALBM. UK appointed Avro as Sister Firm responsible for integration with RAF's 2 platforms. They said it would not fit under low Victor wings. Sir Fred HP said he would sort that, but he had been deemed "difficult" by MoS, as they juggled the "measure of coalescence" that became HSAL+BAC. Avro gave MoS the excuse needed to leave HP out in the cold. 3rd. Victor B.Mk.2 squadron was abandoned (became SR.2), first 2 to be confined to Blue Steel; all 72 Skybolt platforms to be Vulcan B.2.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Merseyside
Age: 45
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know the name of the Narrator on the clip so kindly provided by Eagle...
Last edited by XL391; 1st May 2008 at 15:39.
Mission profile
Chaps... what mission profile would the Vulcan have flown if it had to drop the big one on the Soviets?
Low - high speed and one way I suspect?
Excuse my ignorance but I assume it progressed from dropping a dumb nuke, to flying an entiorely different standoff stype mission with the Blue Steel?
Any former drivers who could tell stories of what the rehearsals were like?
(Without breaking any rules of course
)
That video gives an idea of how scary the whole exercise would have been.
Low - high speed and one way I suspect?
Excuse my ignorance but I assume it progressed from dropping a dumb nuke, to flying an entiorely different standoff stype mission with the Blue Steel?
Any former drivers who could tell stories of what the rehearsals were like?
(Without breaking any rules of course
)That video gives an idea of how scary the whole exercise would have been.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Vulcan roll
Roly Falk did barrel roll the Vulcan at Farnborough; I can't recall the exact year as I went every year starting in 1952 and remember it as one of the highlights of those early visits. I think it was VX777 in 1953 and Falk was flying solo.
On a more somber note, I witnessed the DeH 110 breaking up as it flew towards the crowd and seeing the engines soar over our heads and plough into the crowd behind us. I was part of a very large group of Blackburn Aircraft employees who had travelled down from Brough. As we had all made our way individually from London to Farnborough, we couldn't get a head count until we boarded the train home later that evening.
On a more somber note, I witnessed the DeH 110 breaking up as it flew towards the crowd and seeing the engines soar over our heads and plough into the crowd behind us. I was part of a very large group of Blackburn Aircraft employees who had travelled down from Brough. As we had all made our way individually from London to Farnborough, we couldn't get a head count until we boarded the train home later that evening.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hertfordshire
Age: 70
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
According to Tony Blackman's book 'Vulcan Test Pilot' Roland (Roly) Falk practiced a few barrel rolls from Woodford on the 31st August 1955, possibly in XA889 (without warning the rest of the crew!). He then performed rolls at that year's Farnborough show, possibly in XA890, telling no-one except the show's commentator.
Of course it generated a lot of interest but Falk inevitably got a ticking off from the authorities and was forbidden to repeat it, even though he was able to show that there was positive g throughout the manoevre which was carried out only whilst the plane was climbing. He got his nickname from this episode.
Of course it generated a lot of interest but Falk inevitably got a ticking off from the authorities and was forbidden to repeat it, even though he was able to show that there was positive g throughout the manoevre which was carried out only whilst the plane was climbing. He got his nickname from this episode.
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Witney UK
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why is it that any V-Force thread, regardless of the starting aircraft type, always ends up as a Vulcan nostalgia session. I accept it was and hopefully is a great display aircraft but having been involved with all three, consider it to have been the least use operationally of the trio.
Ducks right down.
Ducks right down.