PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   QF/Finnair A330 Wetlease (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/652797-qf-finnair-a330-wetlease.html)

blubak 22nd May 2023 21:36


Originally Posted by dragon man (Post 11438465)
GOLD MEDAL WINNING ARTICLERear Window https://archive.md/O1Iuz/c7303bb2dd0...e9dac3a9aa.png

Alan Joyce’s Helsinki final act

Joe AstonColumnistMay 22, 2023 – 7.44pm
Save

Share
Qantas chief executive Alan Joyce fronted a press conference on Friday to turn the first sod on a new pilot training centre in Sydney’s St Peters opening early next year. While Qantas and Jetstar pilots will be trained there, the centre will be operated by Canadian training company CAE, which will also own the simulators.
It is easily forgotten that construction was underway on Qantas’ new $165 million flight training centre adjacent to its Mascot headquarters after the existing, company-owned centre was compulsorily acquired by the NSW government for the Sydney Gateway road project. https://archive.md/O1Iuz/d274632a193...98c887512.webp Qantas CEO Alan Joyce. There may need to be a new procedure entered in the Qantas emergency management plan entitled “When the CEO denounces the blinding truth as a lie”. Jean Chung In 2020, when COVID hit, Joyce halted construction, wrote off the sunk costs and sold the land for $100 million. Qantas spent many millions relocating its flight sims interstate and since then, the company has been sending its Sydney-based pilots, at great expense, to train in Melbourne.
The timing of Joyce’s pilot training announcement was, in trademark Qantas fashion, too smart by half. It was so nakedly designed to compensate for the anticipated anger of his pilots at Joyce’s other news that day: that Qantas will bolster its international network by wet leasing – which means leasing a plane with a crew attached – two A330 aircraft from Finnair.
Qantas pilots (and cabin crew) are rightly outraged because Qantas has only just retired two of its own A330s from the passenger fleet and handed them to Qantas Freight.
“Those aircraft were domestic aircraft that were perfect for converting into freighters,” Joyce claimed on Friday.
This is yet another extraordinary statement by Joyce, in a budding oeuvre of them.
As he well knows, all Qantas A330s ply a mix of domestic and international routes. In the final month those two Qantas A330s flew as passenger aircraft, they operated to Auckland, Bali, Jakarta and Singapore.
Joyce is attempting to create a completely false distinction between so-called “domestic” A330s he’s erased and the Asian A330 routes he’s now sub-contracting to Finnair. Niko, Mikael and Johannes are preparing for their three-year working holiday in Bangkok while Alan is on Redbubble ordering gigantic empennage magnets printed with the Qantas livery.
The five-year Finnair deal converts to a dry lease – so operated by Qantas crew – for its second half. Either way, Joyce will be long gone.
“This doesn’t lose a single Australian job,” Joyce declared. “They are positive for the creation of jobs and anyone who says anything else is just completely wrong.”
Anyone who says bussing in pilots and flight attendants from offshore will cost Australian jobs is just plain wrong! Woah. There is a lot going on there, there really is. There may need to be a new procedure entered in the Qantas emergency management plan entitled “When the CEO denounces the blinding truth as a lie”.
Who else wants to live in Alan’s world? He should Airbnb rooms in his house of cognitive distortion. In this magical palace, put on your enchanted spectacles and you, too, can inhabit a universe where anyone who says anything else is completely wrong.
“The other thing it does [is] it adds more capacity internationally,” Joyce continued. “We’re getting a lot of queries from customers, ‘When are airfares going to normalise?’, and these are the ways you normalise airfares. You get these aircraft and capacity back in the air so airfares start coming down.”
Here, Joyce is spritzing the weary passenger with a touch of refreshing cabin spray. I’m normalising situations for you. Airfares will come down now. I’m not just doing what a rational businessperson would do, trying to exploit voracious demand, I’m sliding down the optimisation curve, all for you. I’m leaving soon, dear customer, but not until you love me.
The patterns of Joyce’s approval-seeking are so consistent. Here he is, hoping we’ll taste a little bit of mint in our last bite of the **** sandwich, and we’ll all remember him as Joycey the great competition champion, the frequent flyer’s friend. It’s unreal.
Of course, the real issue here is not the number of Australian jobs forgone by dint of two planes crewed by Helsinki hardbodies. The real issue is why Qantas even needs them.
The real issue is Joyce’s premeditated dereliction of widebody fleet renewal. It is his cancellation of 40 firm Boeing 787s and eight A380s, both orders he inherited. It is Joyce’s failure to order any other widebody aircraft until last year, when he ordered 12 A350s that won’t start arriving until FY26, long after his final tranche of bonus shareshave vested.
Joyce and the Qantas board have not placed any order for the replacement of its 26 dog-tired A330 aircraft, the backbone of the Asia network, whose average age is now 16.5 years (six of them have already turned 20). Their failure to do so has created a looming capability gap. Even if Qantas makes an order this year, the first of any replacements will not arrive for several years.
Blind Freddy can see that these decisions by Joyce have cost thousands of Australian jobs and significantly reduced Qantas’ international capacity; and that he made almost all of them well before COVID.
The only real normalisation coming for Qantas is at the AGM in November, when they put Alan in his straitjacket and wheel him out of there. The planes will keep flying, just, but the mad hot takes will never be the same.

So according to AJ,the 330-200 is a domestic aircraft!
That said,why is he leasing 2 more 'domestic aircraft' to operate international services.
Oh of course,the 2 he is getting converted to freighters were different to every other 330 200 ever built🙄

34R 22nd May 2023 23:26


Originally Posted by The Banjo (Post 11438545)
There is a stark difference between geting paid 'X' salary and actually earning it. That seems to be lost on some on this forum.
Feeding the chooks in crewrest on a 15 hour sector and not sitting in a control seat below FL200 vs doing 4 domestic sectors with 3 aircraft swaps is the difference between getting paid and earning.

I was trying to be ironic…. failed dismally.

As one of those 4 sector worker bees I couldn’t agree more with you.

SevenTwentySeven 23rd May 2023 00:15


Originally Posted by 34R (Post 11438809)
I was trying to be ironic…. failed dismally.

As one of those 4 sector worker bees I couldn’t agree more with you.

Ever considered S/O's are fairly paid but Captain's and F/O's aren't paid enough???

34R 23rd May 2023 00:57


Originally Posted by SevenTwentySeven (Post 11438825)
Ever considered S/O's are fairly paid but Captain's and F/O's aren't paid enough???

I have often considered that, and it would far too simplistic to answer NO to both, but if you pressed me for an answer I would say that on a reward for effort scale, some SO’s are hideously overpaid and some Captains and F/O’s are underpaid.

Which SO’s do you consider are fairly paid? If you answer all then it would appear some are more ‘fairly’ paid than others.

The pool of money allocated to Qantas flight ops has long been disproportionately distributed between SH & LH. AIPA have never really been interested in levelling that curve, and as a fair chunk of flight ops are beneficiaries of that distribution I think it would be fair to say that those pilots haven’t been particularly interested either. Having said that, you can’t put a bowl of cream in front of a cat and kick it up the backside every time it takes a lick. There is a system in place that rewards……..some……… and if you are able to take advantage of that then good on you.

SevenTwentySeven 23rd May 2023 01:19

I don't consider any S/O's "hideously overpaid". Look at the going rate for Captains and F/O's worldwide. Notice any disparities between their Qantas counterparts?

MickG0105 23rd May 2023 01:51


Originally Posted by blubak (Post 11438757)
So according to AJ,the 330-200 is a domestic aircraft!
That said,why is he leasing 2 more 'domestic aircraft' to operate international services.
Oh of course,the 2 he is getting converted to freighters were different to every other 330 200 ever built🙄

Aren't the Finnair A330s -300s?

Fonz121 23rd May 2023 03:05

Take the combined wages of a four-person crew from any other airline in the world and compare it to that of Qantas’. You’ll find that it is probably quite a lot less at QF.

The SOs aren’t paid enough considering they are required to know how to do the exact same job as the Skipper if the need ever presented itself.

Don’t fall into the trap of diminishing your colleagues worth simply because QF created a new rank to give the illusion that those pilots are worth less just to save a buck.

Ollie Onion 23rd May 2023 04:11

Fact of the matter is the SO pay rate is sufficient if they have enough applications to fill the roles.

neville_nobody 23rd May 2023 04:51


Fact of the matter is the SO pay rate is sufficient if they have enough applications to fill the roles.
Well that's not a true representation though. Take away the possibility of any promotion and let's see how well it goes then. It's a starting role in a big airline one which probably 95% of applicants are grossly overqualified and over experience for. So much so that people in the past 10 years if the timing is right have just been by-passing SO roles and sent straight to unpopular FO bases.

ElZilcho 23rd May 2023 05:12

SO’s at QF Air NZ are B scale FO’s because they can’t (under normal ops) takeoff or land… yet are trained and checked to the same standard as an FO. Unlike other carriers where SO’s are cadets who hold Cruise Relief Type Ratings which aren’t recognised outside their Airline.

We have the same issues at Air NZ where, due to the nature of the job, SO’s can earn more than 320 FO’s while on a lower base, but that should be an argument to increase the SH FO rates not reduce the SO rates. Neither Airline is going to attract new hires with the same experience levels they usually enjoy if the starting position is LH SO earning minimum wage.


blubak 23rd May 2023 05:18


Originally Posted by MickG0105 (Post 11438857)
Aren't the Finnair A330s -300s?

Yes you are correct

A320 Flyer 23rd May 2023 06:36


Originally Posted by ElZilcho (Post 11438909)
SO’s at QF (and Air NZ) are B scale FO’s because they can’t (under normal ops) takeoff or land… yet are trained and checked to the same standard as an FO. Unlike other carriers where SO’s are cadets who hold Cruise Relief Type Ratings which aren’t recognised outside their Airline.

We have the same issues at Air NZ where, due to the nature of the job, SO’s can earn more than 320 FO’s while on a lower base, but that should be an argument to increase the SH FO rates not reduce the SO rates. Neither Airline is going to attract new hires with the same experience levels they usually enjoy if the starting position is LH SO earning minimum wage.

They are not trained or checked to the same
standards and they do in fact only
hold cruise relief type ratings….

Ollie Onion 23rd May 2023 07:17


Originally Posted by ElZilcho (Post 11438909)
SO’s at QF (and Air NZ) are B scale FO’s because they can’t (under normal ops) takeoff or land… yet are trained and checked to the same standard as an FO. Unlike other carriers where SO’s are cadets who hold Cruise Relief Type Ratings which aren’t recognised outside their Airline.

We have the same issues at Air NZ where, due to the nature of the job, SO’s can earn more than 320 FO’s while on a lower base, but that should be an argument to increase the SH FO rates not reduce the SO rates. Neither Airline is going to attract new hires with the same experience levels they usually enjoy if the starting position is LH SO earning minimum wage.

Why do you need 'experience' to be an SO?

ElZilcho 23rd May 2023 08:29


Originally Posted by Ollie Onion (Post 11438952)
Why do you need 'experience' to be an SO?

That’s a question for the Airlines hiring department, they set the minimums.
Few years ago Air NZ proposed an SO Cadetship where Pilots would be hired with 500hrs as an SO on minimum wage (thereabouts) to build hours before going to the regional fleets as an FO. Didn’t get very far.

Bottom line is, both QF and Air NZ vastly overstate their entry requirements for the SO position, but if that’s who they want to hire, the experience will cost them, if it’s needed or not.

ElZilcho 23rd May 2023 08:36


Originally Posted by A320 Flyer (Post 11438935)
They are not trained or checked to the same
standards and they do in fact only
hold cruise relief type ratings….

Interesting, didn’t know CASA had cruise relief ratings. My bad, the only SO I know at QF mainline had me believe it was similar to NZ where all SO’s hold a full type rating. Air NZ SO’s can be checked in the left or right seats including all engine out procedures, LMO etc. Literally the only difference from an FO is they can’t occupy a control seat below FL200 and get paid about 25% less.

Will edit my previous post.


soseg 23rd May 2023 12:12

QF SO's are given a CR TR. Can operate out of left or right seat not below 20k.

The last hiring round they upped the minimum requirements to "multi-crew time preferred". I can only guess to try help funnel in the ex cathay etc pilots who were out of work mid covid when EOI opened. All I'll say is I am not aware of any males getting an interview who came from single-pilot operations...

morno 23rd May 2023 12:49

I’m aware of several who did with no multi crew background. Next conspiracy?

Ollie Onion 23rd May 2023 20:12


Originally Posted by ElZilcho (Post 11438980)
That’s a question for the Airlines hiring department, they set the minimums.
Few years ago Air NZ proposed an SO Cadetship where Pilots would be hired with 500hrs as an SO on minimum wage (thereabouts) to build hours before going to the regional fleets as an FO. Didn’t get very far.

Bottom line is, both QF and Air NZ vastly overstate their entry requirements for the SO position, but if that’s who they want to hire, the experience will cost them, if it’s needed or not.

It didn’t get very far as the Unions kicked off, there is no reason why a SO Cadetship wouldn’t work.

ElZilcho 23rd May 2023 23:24


Originally Posted by Ollie Onion (Post 11439275)
It didn’t get very far as the Unions kicked off, there is no reason why a SO Cadetship wouldn’t work.

Obviously the union isn't going to jump at the idea of slashing Pilot salaries. There were other issues than just pay however, but that's for another thread.
My original Point being, if you're hiring experienced Pilots the salary needs to reflect that, even if they're "Only SO's"



neville_nobody 24th May 2023 00:46


My original Point being, if you're hiring experienced Pilots the salary needs to reflect that, even if they're "Only SO's"
Airline accountants don't think that way. They don't have a big picture view of recruiting it's just all about the cheapest labour regardless of anything else. I would suggest it is almost ideological. They don't care about experience or training standards or anything else because it doesn't affect their bonus. Start linking failures in training or extra sim time to the accountants pay and watch what happens to the entry standards.


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:57.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.