Eclan
I examined the evidence, looked at all possibilities, and arrived at the most likely solution. This theory and flightpath has been around since 2016. JustinHeywood Refer to SIR page 27 and the multiple Royal Malaysia Police (RMP) Forensic Reports. Quick recap: RMP seize PIC home flight simulator and fly it on 15Mar2014 CyberSecurity Malaysia examine Simulator from 16 to 18Mar2014 Simulator Logbook file shows Microsoft FSX flown on 09Dec13, 23Jan14 (B738,B77L at Kuala Lumpur), 01Feb14 (DC3 at Yellowknife), 20Feb14 and 15Mar14. Report documented more than 2700 coordinates from separate file fragments. Report found seven ‘manually programmed’ waypoints (without timestamps), that when connected together could create a flight path from KLIA through the Malacca Strait and then to an area south of the Indian Ocean. (note stitched together flightpath is not to IGARI) The final waypoint was flown in a Phoenix Simulation Software (PSS) Boeing 777-200LR (note PSS B777 is not compatible with Microsoft FSX in 2014) The report could not determine if the waypoints came from one or more files (ie different flight sessions) (note the waypoint in the southern Indian Ocean is over 800 nautical miles from arc 7 and beyond the range of MH370) Report conclusion: “there was no activity captured on JP01 and MK26 that conclusively indicate any kind of premeditated act pertaining to the incident MH370” and “there was no unusual activities other than game related flight simulations.” |
Originally Posted by Eclan
(Post 11348803)
I suspect the theory extends not necessarily to an exploding bottle but to an overall system failure, possibly leading to an explosive loss of components but not an explosive decompression.
If as is stated the cabin altitude warning threshold altitude value is reset to 15,000ft then this gives ample opportunity for a human (especially a smoker) to be gradually overcome by hypoxia, especially if he's overwhelmed with automation failure and other technically complex and confusing system failures on top of a diversion. So that theory postulates the aircraft suffered a catastrophic systems failure, turned 180 degrees towards what they believed was the nearest alternate, which was Penang, but eventually the pilots become overwhelmed by hypoxia. But top of descent for Penang was about 10 minutes after that turn. So they would’ve been incapacitated so much they didn’t have the thought capacity to descend. But 20 minutes later they weren’t incapacitated enough to make a 45 degree right turn to the WNW overhead Penang and then start tracking towards the Andaman sea where there are no alternate airports, and then over 30 minutes later make a left turn to fly over the top of Sumatra and out over the Indian Ocean? That just does not make sense, and is impossible to play out in reality. It means you have to believe they were overcome by hypoxia to make irrational decisions but then recovered from that hypoxia to make conscious inputs once again a long time later. |
If they turned for Penang as a result of a known failure they would have descended. No question.
if the aircraft was flying a new route they programmed as a diversion to Penang due an abnormal, then why did they have waypoints in the FMC beyond Penang? |
BuzzBox
How did I calculate the fuel figures? From the B777 Performance charts for the 777-200ER/TRENT892 Modified for the actual aircraft’s (9M-MRO) OFP (PDA of 1.5% with the right engine burn rate 2% greater than the left engine), altitude, speed, wind, ISA deviation, turning FF adjustment, and bleed air selection. This resulted in third degree polynomial equations for FF/weight calculations which was used in a 15 page excel spreadsheet to follow the flightpath until fuel exhaustion at 34S 93E. |
Originally Posted by dr dre
(Post 11348783)
So the oxygen bottle ruptured, took out the transponder and the cabin altitude warning system but left most other systems intact.
Originally Posted by dr dre
(Post 11348783)
It ruptured a hole in fuselage just the precise size needed to let air leak out at such a small rate it would not be detected.
Originally Posted by dr dre
(Post 11348783)
Even the tiniest of holes is still going to have air leak out of the cabin at a rate of about 1000ft per minute (and I'm being very generous there, in reality it should be much more).
Originally Posted by dr dre
(Post 11348783)
At a cabin altitude of 8,000 to 30,000ft (where useful consciousness is about 1 minute) will only take 20 minutes.
Originally Posted by dr dre
(Post 11348783)
QF30's ruptured oxygen bottle caused an almost instantaneous loss of all cabin pressure when it breached the fuselage.
Originally Posted by dr dre
(Post 11348783)
The incident with the Kalitta Learjet in the previous video lasted a grand total of a few minutes, from the pilot descending from FL320 to a more breathable FL110. A few minutes, the time of useful consciousness at FL320 is about 1-2 minutes, so even though he was slurring his words (hypoxia effect) he had just a minute or two to get the aircraft down to more breathable air before he lost the motor skill capacity to make control inputs.
Originally Posted by dr dre
(Post 11348783)
Yet the decompression story requires us to believe that a pilot stayed conscious in that environment for almost an hour with no supplemental oxygen then made a control input to turn the aircraft to the south? Simply not believable.
Originally Posted by dr dre
(Post 11348783)
15,000 ft is the elevation of cities in Peru and Bolivia, so not exactly where hypoxia sets in without supplemental 02. It’s in the 20,000ft range.
Also, it is implied the pilots were smokers. I've had smokers report difficulties breathing at only 10,000ft in an unpressurised aircraft.
Originally Posted by dr dre
(Post 11348783)
It means you have to believe they were overcome by hypoxia to make irrational decisions but then recovered from that hypoxia to make conscious inputs once again a long time later.
Humans will begin to make errors and experience difficulty assimilating information at early stages of hypoxia but without losing consciousness. It is impossible, in this theoretical scenario, to predict the effect of hypoxia on the awareness and decision-making abilities of these pilots other than to say it would be impaired to slowly increasing degrees and would appear to a healthy observer (such as you) to make no sense. Speaking of Helios, there is a very prodigious (and some say pesky) poster around here who I seem to recall has firsthand experience of a scenario almost identical to the Helios event but with a happier ending. He's notable by his absence on this thread but it would be very interesting to hear his take on it all. |
Humans will begin to make errors and experience difficulty assimilating information at early stages of hypoxia but without losing consciousness. It is impossible, in this theoretical scenario, to predict the effect of hypoxia on the awareness and decision-making abilities of these pilots ... |
BuzzBox
If we use the oxygen bottle rupture on QF30 as a guide to the immediate blast area damage, then the L GCU and L BTB are not in the direct “blast” area. The Left Main AC Bus (ie power to SATCOM) may have been isolated automatically because of a fault caused by the oxygen bottle rupture, or the crew, who were overwhelmed by failures, have conducted the ELEC AC BUS L checklist or depowered/repowered the Left Main AC Bus in an attempt to restore lost systems. |
There are sufficient videos of people in hypobaric chambers clearly demonstrating their gradual slip from fully aware to becoming incapacitated in managing even simple skills. The worst part is the general feeling that everything is OK even when their performance is getting far worse. They do seem to recognize they are having trouble but not in a way that indicates the fear they should be having at being deprived of oxygen.
In a short time Kimberly says she feels like she needs oxygen but is unable to figure out how to put the mask back on her face even though it is already nearly in place. Less amusing: Samuel exits the test and soon another is pleased to simply be able to hold his pencil The main take-away for me is to not dawdle when the masks drop. No "one last thing' or "just a second." I expect that for commercial pilots it's also, if the other guy is acting stupid, put your mask on right now and then figure out the other guy; don't stop to ask "Are you OK?" |
Originally Posted by Lookleft
(Post 11348788)
So if all the previous decompression/hypoxia incidents quoted support the theory of slow pilot incapacitation, why doesn't Silk Air, Egypt Air and German Wings support the theory that the pilot was responsible for the aircraft tracking out over the Indian Ocean until it run out of fuel?
Pilot suicide flights are usually over quickly. eg GermanWings |
Originally Posted by Icarus2001
(Post 11348846)
If they turned for Penang as a result of a known failure they would have descended. No question.
if the aircraft was flying a new route they programmed as a diversion to Penang due an abnormal, then why did they have waypoints in the FMC beyond Penang? RIP Flight Attendant Andreas Prodromou The diversion flown from IGARI to Penang was not in LNAV, as observed by primary radar. It was flown manually or in heading mode on autopilot. Without a L FMC, and no auto reversion to the R FMC, there is no active route, VNAV or Top Of Descent from IGARI to Penang. Not until someone manually switches to the R FMC will a LNAV/VNAV route become possible. This causes a software reset, which DELETES THE FLIGHT ID. When the R FMC became available, someone programmed a diversion to Banda Aceh, hence the LNAV track observed on radar west of Penang through the Malacca Strait via VAMPI-MEKAR-NILAM. |
Originally Posted by GBO
(Post 11348881)
Running out of fuel after 7 hours is not usually associated with pilot suicide flights.
Pilot suicide flights are usually over quickly. eg GermanWings It's been suggested that if, as has been speculated, the Captain of MH370 had taken control of the flight and deliberately navigated it to the Southern Indian Ocean, his motivations were very different. If all you want to do is kill yourself, there are easier ways to do it. But if you want to leave behind a huge mystery and maybe cause enormous embarrassment to a government you are bitterly opposed to, then it makes sense. |
Originally Posted by GBO
(Post 11348873)
The Left Main AC Bus (ie power to SATCOM) may have been isolated automatically because of a fault caused by the oxygen bottle rupture...
...the crew, who were overwhelmed by failures, have conducted the ELEC AC BUS L checklist or depowered/repowered the Left Main AC Bus in an attempt to restore lost systems. Without a L FMC, and no auto reversion to the R FMC, there is no active route, VNAV or Top Of Descent from IGARI to Penang. Not until someone manually switches to the R FMC will a LNAV/VNAV route become possible. This causes a software reset, which DELETES THE FLIGHT ID. |
The diversion flown from IGARI to Penang was not in LNAV, as observed by primary radar. It was flown manually or in heading mode on autopilot. |
BuzzBox
Re read, not damage but a fault. Huh! If there is an electrical fault, conducting the ELEC AC BUS L would be a reasonable solution. Read the manual. |
After I stopped watching Harry and Meghan, I needed something to fill the void until Batchelor started! This thread fills the bill. Thanks.
|
Originally Posted by GBO
(Post 11348916)
Re read, not damage but a fault.
Huh! If there is an electrical fault, conducting the ELEC AC BUS L would be a reasonable solution. Read the manual. Thanks for the advice, but with considerable time on type, you can be assured that I have "read the manual" plenty of times. Are you the guy who promoted this theory on Victor Iannello's MH370 blog and was subsequently banned for repeatedly pushing crap that was technically incorrect or had been disproven? |
Originally Posted by itsnotthatbloodyhard
(Post 11348911)
Sorry if I’ve missed something here, but how do you know it wasn’t flown in LNAV?
|
How does the primary radar track reveal which mode the aircraft was in laterally?
|
Originally Posted by GBO
(Post 11348839)
.,,,Report documented more than 2700 coordinates from separate file fragments.
Report found seven ‘manually programmed’ waypoints (without timestamps), that when connected together could create a flight path from KLIA through the Malacca Strait and then …the Indian Ocean… ”The RMP Forensic Report dated 19 May 2014 documented more than 2,700 coordinates retrieved from separate file fragments and most of them are default game coordinates. It was also discovered that there were seven ‘manually programmed’ waypoint4 coordinates that when connected together, will create a flight path from KLIA to an area south of the Indian Ocean through the Andaman Sea. A nice, subtle bit of editing there. You said it ‘could’, they say it ‘will’. I cannot see that this supports the claim that these waypoints were ‘cherry picked’ by nefarious actors. Were there were numerous other manually entered waypoints that were not mentioned in the report? Again, where is the support for the claim that the waypoints were cherry picked? |
Originally Posted by Eclan
(Post 11348854)
I don't think anyone said the cabin altitude alerting system failed. It defaulted, according to this theory, to a higher trigger value but did not fail.
If you can understand the above factors you can see how a gradual decompression fits the theory neatly. I know how Hypoxia works. But the facts of the case don’t match up with a hypoxic scenario. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:55. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.