PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific-90/)
-   -   Merged: All you want to know about A380 for CC! (https://www.pprune.org/australia-new-zealand-pacific/373513-merged-all-you-want-know-about-a380-cc.html)

jungle juice 18th May 2009 00:24

bulstrode,
There is nothing erroneous with my question rather it is your explanation or lack of that is flawed.

You're either technologically challenged or you want the subject closed.

Now why would that be?

bulstrode 18th May 2009 00:57

Oh Dear
 
JJ
FYI I am a qualified Microsoft technician.Have been known to build a computer or two.Humbly I suggest that I am not technically challenged.
You are flogging a dead horse.I note with interest that you are from Melbourne.Explains a lot.My last word on what is a trivial matter being pursued by an obsessive .
Back to the thread topic

RedTBar 18th May 2009 01:31

Oh god JJ i'm no computer wiz and even I get what youre saying.
bulstrode,they don't have to use office computers do they.It's not as if they are busy either.
Nope no one in the office could possibly post on pprune because the company has got some secret electronic shield around QCC which blocks all internet access even to personal devices.bulstrode knows because he is a computer tecnician.

Have been known to build a computer or two.
That only narrows it down to half the population and from memory twiggs is into computers as well.
Now I know why you want to change the subject.

heads_down 18th May 2009 01:39

Jambo juice


You might have your memory slipping yourself heads_down because you have forgetten what you wrote earlier.



In all my years of working in QCC, I can honestly tell all that the norm in Qantas Cabin Services is more "Crew dob in Crew" " the more the better"

ok juice, all I meant was working as a crew, all crews are not separate from the QCC umbrella, ella ella ella...

:rolleyes:

RedTBar 18th May 2009 01:45


ok juice, all I meant was working as a crew, all crews are not separate from the QCC umbrella, ella ella ella...
Moderators,please can you do something about this nutcase.I've seen 2 year olds make more sense.

Crusty Demon 18th May 2009 08:53

Testing .... Post being entered from QCC ..... Sorry to spoil the galley gossip

OCCR 18th May 2009 11:57

heads down keep them coming you're a classic!!!!!!!!
:confused::ok::ugh::{:sad:

argusmoon 22nd May 2009 00:24

The Way The Game is Played
 
Contrary to popular belief promotion is no predicated on merit.It is based on being part of "The Club".You must be invited to join and once you are in you get to have anything you want.Management disregard the promotion process.
They believe it is their right to promote whoever they want.It is this cavalier attitude that disengages employees and why you now have a generation of OBMs who have to call someone before they make a decision.
Look at the fool in Buones Aires recently.The aircraft was delayed so he directed the crew to commence a meal service on the ground.This breaks just about every rule imaginable including those of CASA.But hey he is part of the Club...no Clause 11 for him.He was last seen having coffee with Webster

airbus_galley_girl 22nd May 2009 00:28

Previous communication advised that the names of successful applicants would be published on the Cabin Crew website by 1700 on 20 May 2009.

Please be advised that, as forms are still being processed, the names of successful applicants will now be published on the cabin Crew website no later than 1700 on Wednesday 27 May 2009.

OCCR 22nd May 2009 00:33

that one is interesting argus!

but before you come to conclusions, were the meal trays walked out !
the manual states that you cannot have carts out in the aisle,but you can deliver them by hand!
Even that is quite dangerous as the crew are not manning their doors.

Who would have ordered the crew to do such a foolish action

twiggs 22nd May 2009 01:19

I'd like to hear the full story on that one.
Seems a bit strange on such a long daylight flight to use some of the catering on the ground.
Was one meal service and a few refreshments going to last them for another 14 hours?

jungle juice 22nd May 2009 01:55


I'd like to hear the full story on that one.
So would we twiggs,so why don't you tell us?
If the delay was that enough time to do a meal service then it's long enough to send the pax back into the terminal.If it was not then just keep the pax informed as much as you can and start the IFE.
The CSM in question should be hauled over the coals for doing it but then we all know about the favoured ones.

argusmoon 22nd May 2009 02:19

Promotion of Fools
 
Not wanting to incriminate my source but what about managements favourite CSM who was up to no good in the spa of the hotel in Singapore.His defense:the person who made the allegation had been counselled on a previous trip and the allegation was payback.Anyone else would have been stood down Clause11 issued pending an investigation.Just goes to show it pays to be part of "The Club"
The Buones Aires incident was carts in the aisles not handrun.The CSM did not consider the length of the daylight flight.He just wanted to keep the CC in the Cabin during the delay

mrpaxing 22nd May 2009 04:21

and which
 
"stupid CSS/FA's did it let happen???. alll they had to do is a call to the captain advising of regs.-end of story:ugh:

heads_down 22nd May 2009 05:21

this whole favoritism thing has got to stop, I suggest dobbing the company in to CASA about Bueno Aires and I think that can be done anonymously.

This company just wreaks corruption left right and centre.

How did all this escape AJ's watch?

Shazz-zaam 22nd May 2009 05:46

Crew should have refused to do the service.
A Safety Hazard Report (SHR) should have been submitted, everyone is aware the carts are not allowed in the aisles or crossovers whlist on the ground (CCOM 15.30.3)
The CSM has disregarded SOP, the fool should have got a clause 11.
Now about managements (Fat Boy Slim) favourite CSM, are his initials
J E K??? In his defense he could have said that he was only debriefing him in the spa . :E

BUN-TOSSERS RULE 22nd May 2009 06:47

JEK On A380. 744 goes to BA.

ditch handle 22nd May 2009 06:51

Yes but it was JEK who slipped, "accidently falling into" that fellow in the SIN spa.

I'm believe the interview with Allison Webster where JEK was absolved of any wrong doing went something like this......

YouTube - Sir Norman Fry at Kings Cross

heads_down 22nd May 2009 08:15

and you thought there was a fair go at QCC? Union my foot.

how many victims already hung out to dry by team managers and how many incompetent OBM had gotten away with no punishment whatsoever.

it's no wonder staff are disengaged.

team managers my foot, Union making sure there is fairness and fair go my foot
and the LG and AW and their whole little elderly ladies club can shaft it up the Apollo Rocket rear end. How come they have not been made redundant yet?

what's this spa rendezvous, sounds suss and clandestine.

Is everyone also aware some pretty good looking guy with no merit nor credential, ex BFA turned ex LHR csm turned LG's little boy all merely by looks alone. It's amazing how losing just a few kilos, he is now mister beautiful and acts the part too. Full of ****e.

blackguard 22nd May 2009 08:27

Swahili
 
Anyone care to translate the last post?


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:15.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.