Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Australia, New Zealand & the Pacific Airline and RPT Rumours & News in Australia, enZed and the Pacific

Beard Protest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th July 2025 | 12:06
  #41 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 163
Likes: 46
From: Perth
Originally Posted by Callsign Please
I wonder why the Group hasn’t just made up it’s mind and put whatever rule in it wants like always with everything else.

A month of “consultation” like they want the fight? They want us to be arguing amongst ourselves even more than always, something bad in the results coming?
When was the last time there was a consultation period for a safety policy contained in the FAM?

It shows the safety argument is weak, as this is a HR process and has nothing to do with safety. If it was safety related, there would be no consultation.
Sparrows. is offline  
Reply
Old 18th July 2025 | 13:28
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 66
Likes: 79
From: Commuter
There’s an associated risk complying with the clean shaven policy - Restroom Falls

This will require completion of the mandatory workday course “Restroom Essentials - Safe Shaving”

Please do not complete the workday course titled “Restroom Essentials - Safe Showering” as this topic will be introduced in Semester 2.
KhoaSanRoad is offline  
Reply
Old 18th July 2025 | 23:18
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 116
Likes: 35
From: australia
Originally Posted by BinChook
What constitute clean shaven?

Are they expecting Pilots to shave prior to work each day? If you’re caught with a 2mm stubble will you be sent home?
Yes shave everyday.I don’t agree with the policy, but shaving every day or 2 is hardly alien. Mainline, JQ and EFA pilots have been doing this for ages
Eaglerocker is offline  
Reply
Old 18th July 2025 | 23:44
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 23
Likes: 41
From: Aus
Lol, there is no way having any amount of stubble has any sort of safety impact on the use of the oxygen mask... This is beyond stupid.
Hawker7474 is offline  
Reply
Old 19th July 2025 | 00:54
  #45 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 619
Likes: 687
From: Australia
Originally Posted by Callsign Please
I wonder why the Group hasn’t just made up it’s mind and put whatever rule in it wants like always with everything else.

A month of “consultation” like they want the fight? They want us to be arguing amongst ourselves even more than always, something bad in the results coming?
Because they’re doing it for show. They want to be seen as having consulted.

The airline is run exactly the same as it was during the Joyce era - authoritarian, cost spreadsheets, management KPIs and divide and conquer the minions.

The only difference now is that they’re pretending it’s different.

Clearly they’re going to ban beards group wide. The request for comment is just controlling optics.
Old 19th July 2025 | 02:09
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 211
Likes: 417
From: NSW
If only the pilots/unions were this concerned, outspoken and together when it comes to EBA negotiations.
Gas Chamber is offline  
Reply
Old 19th July 2025 | 03:59
  #47 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 726
Likes: 368
From: Australia
Originally Posted by BinChook
Network and NJS Pilots however will actively push back on stupid rules and will purposely grow beards just to put their management teams in a position where they need to accept the facial hair or stand them down. Obviously they won’t stand them down as they don’t have the crew to sustain the business.
What a load of arrogant BS. The pilots will obay the rules like they do with all other directives by the company. It’s not a huge impost (even if I don’t agree with it) so no one is going to risk their job over a bit of facial hair.
Given a significant number of NJS and Network pilots have applications for Mainline or JQ then they must have accepted that their beard’s days were numbered anyway.
Beer Baron is offline  
Reply
Old 19th July 2025 | 05:01
  #48 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 786
From: The Coal Face
Can employers dictate their employee’s facial grooming?

Where the employer has imposed relevant policies and procedures in relation to the fitment and seal of personal/respiratory protective equipment, the short answer is, yes.
Recently, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) upheld an employer’s decision to terminate an employee who failed to clean shave. This was due to the health risks posed by the airborne contaminants that the employee faced while discharging their duties.
https://chamberlains.com.au/clean-sh...get-you-fired/
The risk to exposure cannot be eliminated. TasWater has in place risk control measures to manage and reduce the risk. These include the supply and use of appropriate respiratory protective equipment (RPE), which is a type of personal protective equipment (PPE). TasWater maintains a PPE procedure, which sets out its requirements for the selection, approval, use, inspection, maintenance and disposal of PPE. The procedure is readily accessible to employees on TasWater’s intranet and forms part of the training for all new employees and training regularly thereafter. TasWater says that the procedure has always contained a requirement that an employee be clean shaven when using RPE but accepts that this requirement was not strictly enforced.
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/dec...2024fwc786.pdf
Chronic Snoozer is offline  
Reply
Old 19th July 2025 | 09:26
  #49 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 449
Likes: 202
From: 3rd Rock
Originally Posted by Chronic Snoozer
I believe on those cases it was the equipment manufacturer who stipulated the clean shaven requirement vs Qantas case of paying some tin pot consulting firm to provide an opinion on the matter.
Lapon is offline  
Reply
Old 19th July 2025 | 10:34
  #50 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 167
Likes: 25
From: 10'S 100'E
If exceptions against a safety mandate are given - it’s not for safety. If exemptions aren’t given will they terminate pilots based on religious beliefs? That would be a difficult slope to navigate.
noclue is offline  
Reply
Old 19th July 2025 | 11:15
  #51 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2014
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 279
Likes: 47
From: Richmond
Originally Posted by Lapon
I believe on those cases it was the equipment manufacturer who stipulated the clean shaven requirement vs Qantas case of paying some tin pot consulting firm to provide an opinion on the matter.
Do you want the job or not?
If you really want a beard join the Navy or the Lakemba community.
What other company rules do you want to debate?
Drinking within hours?
Not wearing the uniform in toto?
Wearing facial tattoos?
Not working on Saturdays because of your religion?
JamieMaree is online now  
Reply
Old 19th July 2025 | 11:29
  #52 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 312
Likes: 324
From: Timbuktoo
If you really want a beard join the Navy or the Lakemba community.
You do realise that the RAAF has moved into the 21st century and permits beards, including for pilots. Maybe you should let them know how dangerous it is?
brokenagain is offline  
Reply
Old 19th July 2025 | 11:34
  #53 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2014
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 279
Likes: 47
From: Richmond
Originally Posted by brokenagain
You do realise that the RAAF has moved into the 21st century and permits beards, including for pilots. Maybe you should let them know how dangerous it is?
Do you want the job or not?
JamieMaree is online now  
Reply
Old 19th July 2025 | 12:35
  #54 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 786
From: The Coal Face
Originally Posted by Lapon
I believe on those cases it was the equipment manufacturer who stipulated the clean shaven requirement vs Qantas case of paying some tin pot consulting firm to provide an opinion on the matter.
I was reflecting on how to go about overturning such a policy. Is it a case of having to go to the FWC and does anyone have the motivation to do that?
Chronic Snoozer is offline  
Reply
Old 19th July 2025 | 22:41
  #55 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 800
Likes: 279
From: East of Westralia
Originally Posted by JamieMaree
Do you want the job or not?
If you really want a beard join the Navy or the Lakemba community.
What other company rules do you want to debate?
Drinking within hours?
Not wearing the uniform in toto?
Wearing facial tattoos?
Not working on Saturdays because of your religion?
Whether you like the decision or not, this is the way.
Company provide a set of guidelines and rules we have to follow if we want the payslip to have Qantas on it.
At the end of the day, we all have a choice.
ScepticalOptomist is offline  
Reply
Old 19th July 2025 | 23:12
  #56 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 1,169
From: Kichin
I think you’ll find the thing our bearded friends are getting fired up about is that once again, Qantas are imposing a change in the rules and hiding behind safety as their rationale. As if Qantas doesn’t have enough problems requiring their immediate attention, they start this pointless fight with an already pissed off pilot group. Furthermore it seems the link guys and girls are always Qantas when it suits management and subsidiaries the rest of the time. If Qantas want them to be Qantas, make them Qantas…..
Old 19th July 2025 | 23:22
  #57 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2018
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 72
Likes: 33
From: Getting there eventually
Originally Posted by JamieMaree
Do you want the job or not? What other company rules do you want to debate?
The company has quite literally asked for input on this topic, rather than imposing their will like on any other occasion. Given that chance, of course debate will ensue. Enjoy the ride
Callsign Please is offline  
Reply
Old 20th July 2025 | 00:13
  #58 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 800
Likes: 279
From: East of Westralia
Originally Posted by Callsign Please
The company has quite literally asked for input on this topic, rather than imposing their will like on any other occasion. Given that chance, of course debate will ensue. Enjoy the ride
The company asking for input is a box ticking exercise so they can come and say “only 3% of the pilots wanted it and the safety case is… blah blah blah…”
You’re delusional if you think they give one iota of a damn what the greater pilot cohort want.
ScepticalOptomist is offline  
Reply
Old 20th July 2025 | 02:00
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 211
Likes: 417
From: NSW
Originally Posted by JamieMaree
Do you want the job or not?
Why does the non pilot care about this subject? Why are you trying to stoke arguments?
I know you like to pretend to be an A380 Captain, but unfortunately just on flight sim in reality.
Gas Chamber is offline  
Reply
Old 20th July 2025 | 02:06
  #60 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 183
From: cowtown
Some lip balms are more of a safety threat than a beard . When assembling oxygen supply lines the use of grease is verboten .
They might want to put some thought into lip balms used for sunscreen at altitude for use with oxygen equipment .
Beard grease and oils , beeswax, petroleum based mineral oils used on the facial beards might not be a smart choice while using oxygen .
The use of moisturizer on deck might need limits . Although I have yet to read any accidents caused by an overly moisturized situation.
Hands slipping off the greased up Yoke ?

fitliker is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.